Jump to content

Blunted 2

Skilled Member
  • Posts

    2,843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by Blunted 2

  1. :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 1295 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 158 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

    Test Time:: Thu Oct 13 2005 03:49:45 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)

    Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.48 sec

    Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 91.39 % of your hosts average (covad.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BK7MI2O8R

    :::.. Upload Stats ..:::

    Connection is:: 1293 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)

    Upload Speed is:: 158 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)

    Test Time:: Thu Oct 13 2005 03:51:20 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)

    Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 6.48 sec

    Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 174.52 % faster than the average for host (covad.net)

    Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2VOZT1P6B

  2. ping from nyc to  cali

    C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>tracert lax.speakeasy.net

    Tracing route to lax.speakeasy.net [64.81.45.2]

    over a maximum of 30 hops:

      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  r-68-xxx-xxx.xxx.nycmny83.covad.net [68.xxx.xxx.xxx

      2    8 ms    7 ms    9 ms  172.31.255.253

      3    6 ms    6 ms    5 ms  192.168.31.41

      4    6 ms    5 ms    5 ms  ge-5-0-180.ipcolo1.NewYork1.Level3.net [63.209.1

    70.233]

      5    6 ms    5 ms    5 ms  ae-1-52.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.33]

      6    73 ms    73 ms    72 ms  as-0-0.bbr1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [64.159.1.157

    ]

      7    73 ms    72 ms    72 ms  4.68.102.11

      8    72 ms    72 ms    73 ms  4.78.194.18

      9    73 ms    73 ms    73 ms  dns.lax1.speakeasy.net [64.81.45.2]

    Trace complete.

    C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping lax.speakeasy.net

    Pinging lax.speakeasy.net [64.81.45.2] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=55

    Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=55

    Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=55

    Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=55

    Ping statistics for 64.81.45.2:

        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 71ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 72ms

  3. i'm in ny on sdsl and here is my ping to the sites he pinged but myspace is cross country for me so verizon ping this and see what you get. nyc.speakeasy.net and then we can see if they are really better.  we also need more people to post here to see the difference.    we also should make another thread comparing the 2 with ping times and trace routes to see if there is really an advantage.

    C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping testmy.net

    Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53

    Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53

    Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53

    Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:

        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 42ms

    C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping myspace.com

    Pinging myspace.com [63.208.226.24] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=247

    Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=247

    Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=247

    Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 63.208.226.24:

        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 71ms, Maximum = 76ms, Average = 72ms

    C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping nyc.speakeasy.net

    Pinging nyc.speakeasy.net [216.254.95.2] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=57

    Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=57

    Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=57

    Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=57

    Ping statistics for 216.254.95.2:

        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

        Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 7ms, Average = 6ms

  4. you probably wont get much lower pings cause i have tested it but you might get 10 ms better if your lucky but not by much.  check the isp's sla + tos and see what the average latency is for the T1 cause  some places garrentee 110 ms round trip time and some offer 55 ms so check around before you get one

  5. everyone i know or ever connected to with cable sucks for gaming and cant host for crap like the cable i had (optimum online).  also i hate people saying this is better and that is better it depends where you live so there is no better one and each one has its advantages and disadvantages to live with.

  6. with networx from softperfect.com and kerio firewall.  this comp is a POS and doesnt even have paint lmao so i cant prove this speed  but i can prove the 18,000 kB sec lan speeds.

    i got this speed connecting 2 comps with directly together with cat 6 wire i made about 6 inches and 2 gigabit ethernet cards set at 1000 MB full duplex but the cpu on the POS comp is the bottleneck and was hitting 100% before i hit this speed.  this was just the max it hit which was just a spike. 

    validation link? i cant on lan

    have to get paint or something to get a screenshot for here

  7. i have been hosting a few hours a night and this is what i got from hosting with 3 xboxes and playing on another 1.

    Date    Received    Sent      Total        Dialup

    9/9/2005 646 MB         374 MB         0.99 GB N/A

    9/10/2005 1.21 GB 667 MB       1.86 GB  N/A

    9/11/2005 845 MB         984 MB       1.78 GB  N/A

    9/12/2005 1.59 GB 3.66 GB 5.26 GB N/A

    Week                          Received        Sent            Total    Dialup

    9/4/2005 - 9/10/2005     1.84 GB   1.01 GB 2.86 GB N/A

    9/11/2005 - 9/17/2005     2.43 GB   4.66 GB 7.10 GB N/A

    Month                        Received  Sent          Total    Dialup

    September 2005  4.28 GB   5.68 GB 9.96 GB N/A

×
×
  • Create New...