Jump to content

RaulJimenez

Members
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by RaulJimenez

  1. This was a 20mb file i tested: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3251 Kbps about 3.25 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 397 kB/s Tested From:: http://demonlegion.net Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 7:52pm Bottom Line:: 57X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 2.58 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 52.843 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.82 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XGRJK49O8
  2. Your connection is: 4614 Kbps or 4.61 Mbps You Downloaded at: 563 kB/s You are running: 80 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.82 second(s) Member Ident: Username:RaulJimenez CompID:6461011105 Test Time:: 2006/04/10 - 7:39pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Test ID: K41ATZ0MX (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 123.98 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 5.312 seconds to complete
  3. I know I asked them to update their config file for my new modem, maybe that has something to do with it.
  4. My modem is not uncapped so I'm not doing anything illegal, and terayon modem has a restricted cap at 4mb, getting another modem is a good idea for the future if they decide to upgrade the packages as i've heard they bought more bandwidth and will start offering more bandwidth in the future.
  5. parabot : I bought the Motorola SB 5120, but you can get the SB5100 and it will do, yes theterayon is capped at 4mb.
  6. Im rocking Im rocking!! Your connection is: 4682 Kbps or 4.68 Mbps You Downloaded at: 572 kB/s You are running: 82 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.79 second(s) Member Ident: Username:RaulJimenez CompID:6461011105 Test Time:: 2006/04/09 - 8:04pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Test ID: HV0DEF8O3 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 127.61 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 5.235 seconds to complete
  7. yes if they would increase the upload ratio this thing would be flying right now, I'm gonna try and convince some high command people i know to see if they have it on their plan, they made a big bandwidth purchase this week so i expect more speed latencies too
  8. definitely I like your graph osva, someone finally made sense to the chain of command in onelink. Where you got that graph from brothetr?
  9. Your connection is: 4628 Kbps or 4.63 Mbps You Downloaded at: 565 kB/s You are running: 81 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 1.81 second(s) Member Ident: Username:RaulJimenez CompID:6461011105 Test Time:: 2006/04/06 - 5:35pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Test ID: ZFLSWC63O (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 127.2 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 5.296 seconds to complete
  10. Osva whats your usual speed on P2P and what program are you using, somehow onelink is getting better, I see no packet loss except a bit on the route going transatlante which is obvious it will have some but they are blocking my p2p.
  11. I'm not really worried about speed , is the packet loss that is incredible.
  12. sigh... no improvement =(. Im actually getting slower speeds in the day too.
  13. Fuck man where do you live?? I'm nowhere near you on the amount of packet loss im suffering.
  14. :haha: :haha: :haha: The change to sprint backbone is worse than having adelphia servers on our backbone lol
  15. you are kidding me right? the latency is nowhere fixed.
  16. gracias voy para alla tamb, thanks im going there too.
  17. Well I havent been here in a while now but I just wanted to say the service is still horrible. the packetloss keep coming up and Im wondering what the fuck they did in order to get all this service straight to hell. I'll keep complaining and calling but complaining to a tech service wont do shit unless you actually tell them to speak to a high command guy. Otherwise you can yell cuss or do whatever u want as soon as you hang up is over.
  18. I was asking myself the same question bro, why so many hops to go to a damn website sigh..... =/
  19. I must be dreaming but I can actually surf the net and download better right now lmao, ohh go sprint go sprint lol :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4418 Kbps about 4.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 539 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Sun Feb 26 2006 14:03:28 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 79X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.9 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 106.35 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Z6ILN3TUH
×
×
  • Create New...