Siryak
-
Posts
667 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by Siryak
-
-
i beleive this is now a hostage situation.
WATER YOU NEED TO LET CA3LE OUT OF YOUR CLOSET SO HE CAN GET SOME FRESH AIR!!!!!
Ok here is the plan. You stand outside her window and flex. While she is laughing at you uncontrollably I will sneak in and make the extraction. Then if she tries to make a chase we will get Shug to threaten her with his mad skills, making her again laugh uncontrollably and we make a clean get away. The plan is fool proof.
-
Value pack for download is 7.5, Select Pack 11 or 12 gigs...Pro Pack 17 Gigs. Do you not know how to check your FAP meter? If you signed up with Wildblue directly then go to wildblue.net and click on admintool I believe is what it's called. If you signed up at a coop then type in admintool.coopname.net
-
I would start by calling CellOne...There probably is a way. There may be a small fee though so might want to ask about that.
-
[glow=red,2,300]
[/glow]Exactly....Being a person that computers is my hobby it is down right torturous lol.
Being a person that likes to do online gaming it is just cruel to have latency like this:
Pinging yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1004ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1376ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1193ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1214ms TTL=46
Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1004ms, Maximum = 1376ms, Average = 1196ms
-
did you ever think of going over too comcast or using DSL service in your area its lot cheaper??
If I could I would snatch it up faster than a donut at a weight watchers convention...Problem is satellite is the only thing available.
-
Wow $80 bucks? what package did you get for that?? thats Sux
That is the Wildblue Pro-Pack and yes it does suck. It sucks and blows at the same time!!!
If you ever haft to use Satellite internet you might as well bend over and get ready...
-
$80 a month.
-
So what was it that won first prize?
-
So do you have any cooling issues on that thing in such a small case???
-
I wanna see!!!
-
Lol looks like kamil got fooled.
:2funny: :2funny: -
Lol here are some more:
Error 008: Interference detected. Remove aluminum foil and remote control devices.
Error 8P: Unclear on whether your search is about money or monkeys. Please try again.
Error: Insufficient conviction. Please clap hands 3 times, while chanting "I believe" and try again.
Error 001: Weak or no signal detected. Upgrade transmitter and retry.(Lol this one was my favourite)
Error 666: Multiple transmitters detected. Silence voices in your head and try again.
Error: MentalPlex has determined that this is not your final answer. Please try again.
Error 144: That information was lost with the Martian Lander. Please try again.
-
Dam I was just fixing to post that!!! lol
Here are some more:
http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html
-
omg...whatta twat!!
i'm in stitches peepersOh my.
-
Here is my tracert...Sizzling!!! lol.....Or maybe I am just the one sizzling...
Tracing route to google.com [64.233.187.99]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 1193 ms 1641 ms 1198 ms 10.10.0.1
3 1163 ms 1604 ms 1067 ms 10.245.20.1
4 * 1975 ms 1239 ms 10.245.30.27
5 1455 ms 1100 ms 2719 ms 10.245.30.1
6 1518 ms 1115 ms 708 ms 10.245.100.2
7 1127 ms 707 ms 1406 ms 10.245.110.2
8 1250 ms 1098 ms 1269 ms 12.124.219.17
9 1992 ms 1260 ms 2540 ms gbr1-p70.auttx.ip.att.net [12.123.133.162]
10 1839 ms 1220 ms 2927 ms tbr2-p012301.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.109]
11 1295 ms 1410 ms 1276 ms ggr3-ge90.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.197]
12 1531 ms 1240 ms 1465 ms br2-a340s4.dlstx.ip.att.net [192.205.33.142]
13 1206 ms 1816 ms 1310 ms 40.icore1.DTX-Dallas.teleglobe.net [66.198.1.10]
14 1705 ms 1584 ms 1190 ms 3.icore1.A56-Atlanta.teleglobe.net [209.58.47.2]
15 1196 ms 3204 ms 1721 ms if-5-0-0.har1.A56-Atlanta.teleglobe.net [64.86.9
.13]
16 1167 ms 1180 ms 1187 ms ix-2-0.har1.A56-Atlanta.teleglobe.net [64.86.9.6
]
17 1721 ms 1392 ms 1266 ms 64.233.174.84
18 1207 ms * 1569 ms 72.14.236.173
19 1445 ms 1730 ms 1195 ms 216.239.49.222
20 1589 ms 1274 ms 1336 ms jc-in-f99.google.com [64.233.187.99]
Trace complete.
-
If you think about it ping times with satletite are going to be high no matter what. I mean everything is going to space.
Not this high...The signal going through space only accounts for about 500ms of the latency. The rest is in their gateways.
Pinging yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2045ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1210ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1893ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1250ms TTL=46
Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1210ms, Maximum = 2045ms, Average = 1599ms
-
Medical transcripting aka typing for doctors is a pretty good job. Problem is finding a doctors office. Usually they are short on typers so if you ask they usually give you information and probably interview or something.
She is actually working at a doctor's office right now. She used to order supplies and now she is taking patience back and giving the shots...
-
My sister has 2 kids and she is looking for a stay at home job. She asked me for help finding one so here I am. Does anybody know of a legit job that she could do on the computer???
-
The reason there aren't any positive comments about Wildblue, is because there isn't really anything positive to say. Have you looked into "Sprint" EVDO? Have you checked for WISPs in your area? As it stands right now I would say Hughesnet is putting out the better product as far as satellite internet goes. Wildblue is still having major growing pains that Hughesnet has already been through and put behind them. I would not recommend EDGE. It is a horrible technology and your dial-up will literally outperform it.
Here is the latency you can expect from Wildblue. It doesn't get any better than this either.
Pinging yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2989ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1300ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1212ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1208ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1215ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1237ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1191ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1351ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1256ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1554ms TTL=46
Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1191ms, Maximum = 2989ms, Average = 1451ms
-
C:Documents and SettingsTim>ping google.com
Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=247
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=247
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=247
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 5ms
C:Documents and SettingsTim>tracert google.com
Tracing route to google.com [64.233.167.99]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 4 ms 5 ms 6 ms 74-132-30-1.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.132.30.1]
2 6 ms 5 ms 6 ms 74-132-0-189.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.132.0.189]
3 7 ms 6 ms 7 ms 74.128.8.205
4 6 ms 5 ms * so-7-1.car2.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.71.182.25]
5 4 ms 5 ms 4 ms 4.79.66.30
6 5 ms 6 ms 5 ms 72.14.232.57
7 5 ms 15 ms 6 ms 72.14.232.70
8 6 ms 7 ms 4 ms py-in-f99.google.com [64.233.167.99]
Trace complete.
What did you do, break into the Google warehouse and plug directly into their server?!?!?!?!
-
Nos your latency is absolutely outstanding!!! You make me want to throw something at you!!! lol
Bet you can't top this!!! I know it's probably hard to believe how somebody could get such great ping times.
Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1481ms TTL=237
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1342ms TTL=237
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1159ms TTL=237
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1879ms TTL=237
Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1159ms, Maximum = 1879ms, Average = 1465ms
-
I didnt realize this was a hughesnet forum guys, sorry about that
Im sorry but to post ping times like that in a satellite forum is an unforgivable sin.
lol jk
-
*sigh* Rub it in lol.
Your edit was not fast enough for my poor satellite abused eyes.
-
It is true. The pings on the new satellite which doesn't have hardly anybody on it is averaging in the 1100-1200ms range. This is just ridiculous. This IS NOT normal satellite latency. In fact the Hughesnet system which is supposed to have worse latency actually cuts Wildblue's latency in half. So it CAN be done.
[/glow]
New Servers Speeds
in Show off your speed
Posted
I would never leave my computer if I had that connection. I would sleep on it, eat on it, and...eh yah I guess I would leave to go to the bathroom. Might would haft to get a bucket...lol jk.