Jump to content

gourame

Members
  • Posts

    253
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

Posts posted by gourame

  1. @gourame

    nice stats.. afaik CB's 20 step requires canopy tweak? im scared.. lol

    EDIT:

    well maybe not in the 20 step. but in other threads i think  :uglystupid2:

    you can skip some steps if your reluctant to. but i think your test shows already a promising speed and would jeopardize your current speed. looking for more juice would be ill advised. 

  2. share2-VWF5OX7A6

    This is my speed after i did the [move]10.20.30.40 tweak[/move]. Now, in interested in coolbuster's 20 steps in speeding up smartbro. Will these steps still work even if i already did the 10.20.30.40 tweak?  :grin: :grin:

    one will never be contented if another tweak promises a much better gain, id recommend CB's 20 step since you are interested.

  3. you mean you were able to request a sendfar? is it better than canopy?

    this is a friends setup he got when canopy lite where not that common those days. i tried some tweaks and came up with these speeds. i hope i can get these speeds with the canopy lite, haven't got that chance to really get pass 1000 Kbps.

  4. How often do you flush DNS? I run CCleaner around twice a week.. I think i got to try..

    in my case if i take a test and speeds are not consistent i run them and take a newer test. say if i drop by 400 mark then im gonna run the cleaner, but theres a time when your AP goes around 26+ users then u can't really get the best speeds coz lots of other people are online at the same time.

  5. So.. flushing the DNS really works?

    i guess it does i just took a test not running ccleaner,  used flushdns instead, heres the result. not using both ccleaner gives me 500+ mark

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 618 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 75 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2007/10/10 - 8:30pm

    Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 13.65 sec

    Tested from a 579 kB file and took 7.681 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 145.24 % faster than the average for host (smartbro.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XVNT27U90

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7 [!]

  6. consistent speed huh @ gourame. anything you can share how you've achieved that?  :smiley:

    same method flush cache with crap cleaner  and take the test. works out just fine. nothing new added. same goes with my 2nd xp machine on its 20 step .

    this is sample not using ccleaner before the test.

    :::.. Download Stats ..:::

    Download Connection is:: 604 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)

    Download Speed is:: 74 kB/s

    Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

    Test Time:: 2007/10/10 - 8:08pm

    Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 13.84 sec

    Tested from a 579 kB file and took 7.852 seconds to complete

    Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 139.68 % faster than the average for host (smartbro.net)

    D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NGZ71O59M

    User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7 [!]

  7. are there other way to access to my canopy???

    you might wanna try the Mac  address conversion method, i believe you have been

    one of those who got into that area wide mass configuration. you should get the mac address of the canopy and convert them and use the 10.x.x.x series access. i still don't feel good i wasn't able to help out last time.

×
×
  • Create New...