Jump to content

gourame

Members
  • Posts

    253
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by gourame

  1. you can skip some steps if your reluctant to. but i think your test shows already a promising speed and would jeopardize your current speed. looking for more juice would be ill advised.
  2. one will never be contented if another tweak promises a much better gain, id recommend CB's 20 step since you are interested.
  3. cool speeds... ill be joining testmy.net soon...
  4. just dropping by. ill join soon enough when work is done. more power. keep up the good deeds.
  5. this is a friends setup he got when canopy lite where not that common those days. i tried some tweaks and came up with these speeds. i hope i can get these speeds with the canopy lite, haven't got that chance to really get pass 1000 Kbps.
  6. Same as the other guys i'm with the 384kbps package. I guess its just luck i can get that speed. peak time speeds are 500 below, normal 600, and lucky speeds are like those 1k speeds.
  7. this is the same css im using that i already shared in some topics for use. not all have seen good results with this but its the one im currently using since august. hope it helps.
  8. in my case if i take a test and speeds are not consistent i run them and take a newer test. say if i drop by 400 mark then im gonna run the cleaner, but theres a time when your AP goes around 26+ users then u can't really get the best speeds coz lots of other people are online at the same time.
  9. i guess it does i just took a test not running ccleaner, used flushdns instead, heres the result. not using both ccleaner gives me 500+ mark :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 618 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 75 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/10/10 - 8:30pm Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 13.65 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 7.681 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 145.24 % faster than the average for host (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XVNT27U90 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7 [!]
  10. same method flush cache with crap cleaner and take the test. works out just fine. nothing new added. same goes with my 2nd xp machine on its 20 step . this is sample not using ccleaner before the test. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 604 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 74 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/10/10 - 8:08pm Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 13.84 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 7.852 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 139.68 % faster than the average for host (smartbro.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NGZ71O59M User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7 [!]
  11. well said! lets just do what we do best to explore the possibilities of gaining more advantages smart has to offer.
  12. you might wanna try the Mac address conversion method, i believe you have been one of those who got into that area wide mass configuration. you should get the mac address of the canopy and convert them and use the 10.x.x.x series access. i still don't feel good i wasn't able to help out last time.
  13. atay pulitiko diay hehe ayo ayo lang ta dire sa TMN kay amigo lang man ta tanan.
×
×
  • Create New...