wrc Posted January 29, 2006 CID Share Posted January 29, 2006 I downloaded and ran cablenut, not that impressed with the program, am i missing something? before installing cablenut: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 384 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 47 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Sun Jan 29 20:46:58 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB download in 21.79 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 40.42 % of your hosts average (as9105.com) after installing cablenut with fast 2k.ccs :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 368 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Sun Jan 29 21:12:15 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB download in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 38.78 % of your hosts average (as9105.com) after trying normal 2k.ccs i got a faster speed, but tried the test again out of curiousity and got an even faster speed after changing nothing! so, what did i miss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 29, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 29, 2006 should have added: Tiscali 1mb adsl speedtouch usb modem adware,spyware and virus free Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Welcome, wrc. We need a bit more info. Please read HERE and post back as much info as you can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Ok read the sticky: running Xp professional ISP is Tiscali, 1mb package TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 34848 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 34848 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1393.92 kbps (174.24 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 557.568 kbps (69.696 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 38 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) tracert and ping program: The current date is: 30/01/2006 The current time is: 9:14:04.96 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [.............85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from ..................: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=54 Reply from ...................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from .....................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from .....................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from .......................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from .......................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from .......................: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=54 Reply from .....................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from .....................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from ......................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from ......................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Reply from ......................: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for ......................: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 171ms, Maximum = 187ms, Average = 173ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [........................] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 26 ms 15 ms 13 ms lo99.glo-3-dsl.as9105.net [212.74.111.243] 2 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 212.74.106.202 3 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms pos0-0.bri1.as9105.net [212.74.108.162] 4 15 ms 15 ms 31 ms ge1-1.bri0.as9105.net [212.74.108.130] 5 30 ms 31 ms 31 ms pos0-0.rdg1.as9105.net [212.74.111.182] 6 30 ms 31 ms 31 ms pos3-0.he-lon0.as9105.net [212.74.108.6] 7 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms so-1-1-0.lon22.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.77.177] 8 93 ms 93 ms 93 ms so-1-0-0.nyc33.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.253] 9 93 ms 93 ms 107 ms ge-7-11.car2.NewYork1.Level3.net [213.200.66.210] 10 93 ms 93 ms 104 ms ae-1-55.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.129] 11 177 ms 171 ms 171 ms as-0-0.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.0.137] 12 171 ms 187 ms 187 ms ae-23-54.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.111] 13 187 ms 187 ms 187 ms 4.78.221.146 14 187 ms 187 ms 187 ms vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 15 311 ms 218 ms 249 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 16 171 ms 171 ms 187 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 17 187 ms 187 ms 187 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. The only other thing of note from the sticky, is LAN settings in internet options. the box is checked for auto detect. i didnt untick it as i dont know what this will do? and, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS , whats this? how? ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 i also noticed while downloading the firewall recommended in the sticky that my download speed is only 33kb/sec compared to 118kb/sec before i installed cablenut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Try this ccs file Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 RWIN = 64240 MSS = MTU - 40 = 1460 64240 = 1460 x 44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 thanks trogers, but your last post makes no sense to me i'm afraid, could you explain to a dummy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 This was your test results: TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 34848 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 34848 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): This was your question: consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS , whats this? how? ? Your old RWIN = 34848 My ccs file changed it to 64240 64240 = MSS x 44 Your MSS is 1460 so I just changed your RWIN = MSS x 44 as recommended by your test results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 will try, then repost results. thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Try this ccs file this is not a .ccs file? its a .txt file. how do i get cablenut to enter these values? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Download the Cablenut Adjuster program from this site http://www.cablenut.com/ and use it to open the ccs file. Save to registry and reboot comp. Then run tests again and post results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Download the Cablenut Adjuster program from this site http://www.cablenut.com/ and use it to open the ccs file. Save to registry and reboot comp. Then run tests again and post results. i already have cablenut installed, from that site as well. but its a text file, cablenut doesnt see it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Here it is again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Here it is again sorry, but when i download it, it is a .txt file not a .ccs file its called index.txt i dont know how to apply these values, and cablenut doesnt see this file Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Then open your Cablenut adjuster and manually enter the following: DefaultReceiveWindow - 64240 DefaultSendWindow - 64240 DisableAddressSharing - 1 InitialLargeBufferCount - 200 InitialMediumBufferCount - 480 LargeBufferSize - 819200 MaxFastTransmit - 64000 MediumBufferSize - 150400 PriorityBoost - 0 SmallBufferSize - 12800 TransmitWorker - 32 FastSendDatagramThreshold - 4096 EnableFastRouteLookup - 1 EnablePMTUDiscovery - 1 IgnorePushBitOnReceives - 0 GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize - 64240 MaxFreeTcbs - 8000 MaxHashTableSize - 32768 MaxNormLookupMemory - 5000000 SackOpts - 1 SynAttackProtect - 1 Tcp13230pts - 0 TcpLogLevel - 1 TcpMaxDupAcks - 2 TcpMaxHalfOpen - 100 TcpMaxHalfOpenRetried - 80 TcpRecvSegmentSize - 1460 TcpSendSegmentSize - 1460 TcpTimedWaitDelay - 30 TcpUseRFC1122UrgentPointer - 0 TcpWindowSize - 64240 MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server - 20 MaxConnectionsPerServer - 10 Default TTL - 64 DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 TcpMaxDataRetransmissions - 6 DefaultTOSValue - 240 Then save this ccs file with the cablenut program, save to registry and reboot comp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Then open your Cablenut adjuster and manually enter the following: Then save this ccs file with the cablenut program, save to registry and reboot comp. There is no value for initial small buffer count,(6th box down) is this correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 initial small buffer count - 640 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Ok, :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 867 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 106 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Mon Jan 30 12:22:25 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 15X faster than 56K 1MB download in 9.66 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 91.36 % of your hosts average (as9105.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NCHO4RBT6 TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled Receive Window = 64240 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2569.6 kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1027.84 kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Test both download and upload with the largest file 2992 kb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 955 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 117 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Mon Jan 30 16:05:11 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 17X faster than 56K 1MB download in 8.75 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 0.63 % faster than the average for host (as9105.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6R4Y27ASZ :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 255 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 31 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Mon Jan 30 16:08:05 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 33.03 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 59.38 % faster than the average for host (as9105.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JMV0WEB2A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 30, 2006 CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Congrats. The speeds look great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrc Posted January 30, 2006 Author CID Share Posted January 30, 2006 Congrats. The speeds look great. a huge improvement for sure, many thanks for your patience and help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.