Doomsday Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 well,saved up some cash and bought a DI-524 Router{using the ethernet connections} cause i had enough of the problems with the 604{it would be on,but yet you couldn't get online unless you yanked the AC Plug out and it use to take 10-15 minutes to turn on} using Van's 4000 Settings :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 353 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 43 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:56:47 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 23.81 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 17.28 % faster than the average for host (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QWR8Y29JD however,my download: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1277 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 156 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:59:12 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.56 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 36.1 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OJIS23X5W i have 4mb/384. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Carry out these two test and post all results: https://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ In the 2nd link, post the results of STATISTICS and last 2 paragraphs of MORE DETAILS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomsday Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 TCP options string = 020405b40103030501010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 1827840 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 5 bits (scale factor of 10) Unscaled Receive Window = 57120 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8 ) 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your RcvWindow limits you to: 73113.6 kbps (9139.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your RcvWindow limits you to: 29245.44 kbps (3655.68 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 53 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) Second Link: WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.81Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 342.99kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 167.81 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 12 packets retransmitted, 47 duplicate acks received, and 51 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.4 seconds (4.0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [24.115.x.x] but Client says [192.168.0.100] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [1.81<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [0.00>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [1.81<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.4>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [8760>0] estimate = 0.4 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 167.81msec, and loss = 0.027491409 The theoretical network limit is 0.4 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 381.39 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 1785.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 83.10 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.86 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' <edit> hid IP <br>-FE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Reasons why you have slow speed: RWIN is set very high resulting in excessive packet losses Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 1827840 There were 12 packets retransmitted, 47 duplicate acks received, and 51 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.4 seconds (4.0%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.97% of the time. Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Network traffic in your area is now very high. If you do any speedtest now, the results will not be optimum. In order to check optimum performance, you have to test speed between 2-3 am. Your PC/Workstation has a 1785.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 83.10 Mbps. The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.86 Mbps. Try this ccs file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomsday Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 with your file: :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 280 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 34 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:46:46 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 30.12 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 92.72 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SOYZ8FWBN :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 610 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Download Speed is:: 74 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:48:33 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB download in 13.84 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 17.28 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7QM5VUWOF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Redo this test and post results again: http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Where are you located. When I did a traceroute to your IP Adress, I get latency of 710 ms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Subsequent traceroutes to your IP Address shows latency fluctuating between 53 ms to 710 ms within minutes. I think you are having electrical noise affecting your signal. Is your modem and router next to each other? If so, keep them separated a foot apart. Read these links: https://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=1885 https://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=117 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomsday Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 East Coast. Pennsylvia something is def. wrong. Re-did the test: WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 460.97Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 389.32kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 187.31 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 13 packets retransmitted, 109 duplicate acks received, and 118 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.68 seconds (6.18%) of the time This connection is network limited 99.98% of the time. Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [24.115.x.x] but Client says [192.168.0.100] Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.46<5] (rwintime > .9) [0>.9], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [0.00>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.99>.6], (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [29200>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.46<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.02<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [2.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.35>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [0/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [2.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.09>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.99>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [29200>0] estimate = 0.35 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 187.31msec, and loss = 0.028132992 The theoretical network limit is 0.35 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 341.67 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 125.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 5.23 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 2.37 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' <edit> hid IP<br>-FE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomsday Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 hit it right on trogers. turns out the heat pump to my house was making noise.i couldn't hear it till i walked into the kitchen.turned off the heat and now :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3433 Kbps about 3.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 419 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:17:00 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 61X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.44 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 97.25 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GTUEP3CQV :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 294 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 36 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:18:49 GMT-0500 Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 28.44 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 97.67 % of your hosts average (ptd.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RIYTQOXEC my dad was telling me today he thought the heat pump didn't sound right. glad the connection is alright and i didn't start going mad switching stuff around,but now i'm worried about the heat pump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Thanks for your sharing with us too. We have learn something new today...Heat pumps...LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomsday Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 How Heat Pumps Work: http://home.howstuffworks.com/question49.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Very cool. Good job guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.