adiace Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3647 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 445 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Fri Feb 3 02:01:59 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 65X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.3 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 24.05 % faster than the average for host (rogers.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B85LXGOIV This is what I'm getting now without changing a single thing from last time trogers told me to reboot. To answer your questions, Yes I'm using a router and it is wireless, but I also tried doing a direct connection to my PC from the modem and I got the same slow results as I was getting previously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 The values are according with my ccs file 1500-128480-64240.ccs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 If you can increase your RWIN to 128480 your PC throughput limit will be 6+ Mbps and your download speed will be able to reach 5.3-5.6 Mbps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adiace Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 How would I go about doing so trying out TCP Optimizer? Just input all the fields from Cablenut to the TCP Optimizer fields while on "Custom Settings?"? Or would you suggest I try something else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 If cablenut shows 128480 RWIN and the speedguide analyzer shows 64240, then it is likely that the router is limiting throughput. Try this test: http://www.testmy.net/d_load.php?ni=1&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=mirror-ShaneAU&out_src=20MB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 You do not need to cancel the Cablenut settings. In the TCP Optimizer, select Custom settings and just enter the following values: Custom settings - check Modify All Network Adapters - check network adapter selection - your NIC MTU - 1500 TTL - 64 TCP Receive Window - 128480 MTU Discovery - Yes Black Hole Detect - No Selective Acks - Yes Max Duplicate ACKs - 2 TCP 1323 Options: Windows Scaling - check Timestamps - uncheck Advanced Settings tab: Max Connections per Server - 10 Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20 LocalPriority - 5 Host Priority - 6 DNSPriority - 7 NetbtPriority - 8 Lan Browsing speedup - optimized QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0 ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 240 MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0 NetFailureCacheTime - 0 NegativeSOACache Time - 0 LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768 Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect You can see most of the setting values are similar to Cablenut. There is one advantage over Cablenut - you can modify your network adaptors. But Cablenut has a better and more convenient presentation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adiace Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3213 Kbps about 3.2 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 392 kB/s Tested From:: http://matrixau.net Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 57X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.61 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 9.32 % faster than the average for host (rogers.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-S4JIHNF9L Can I do anything about the router? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Perhaps you can read through your hardware manuals or surf to the manufacturer's website, you can find an answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Download this, and extract both files to the same directory. Then run the test.bat and post the log it creates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adiace Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Pasted from log file: ftp> Connected to ftp1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net. open ftp1.optonline.net 220 ftp1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net FTP server (Version wu-2.6.1(4) Thu Oct 12 12:43:54 EDT 2000) ready. User (ftp1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:(none)): 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. 230 Guest login ok, access restrictions apply. ftp> ftp> Local directory now C:. ftp> lcd C: get test16 200 PORT command successful. 150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for test16 (16777216 bytes). 226 Transfer complete. ftp: 16777216 bytes received in 33.92Seconds 494.63Kbytes/sec. ftp> quit 221-You have transferred 16777216 bytes in 1 files. 221-Total traffic for this session was 16777678 bytes in 1 transfers. 221-Thank you for using the FTP service on ftp1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net. 221 Goodbye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 ftp: 16777216 bytes received in 33.92Seconds 494.63Kbytes/sec. Which is 4052 Kbps. adiace, is that over your wireless connection? Are you able to run a direct connection to the modem and try test.bat again? I simply am trying to determine how much your router is influencing your speeds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Here's another to try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adiace Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 This is over my wireless. I will connect it directly and do the test again, will take me a few minutes but I'll be back with the results soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adiace Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 Unfortunetly I couldn't get it to even make a connection to the net using the modem directly, I will try it again tomorrow I just didn't want to keep you waiting until I figured out what was wrong. I ran the speedtest right now using the wireless again and got these results: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5349 Kbps about 5.3 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 653 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Fri Feb 3 03:27:59 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 96X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.57 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 81.75 % faster than the average for host (rogers.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PI4URDG08 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 That's looking much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adiace Posted February 3, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 My speed seems to be a whole lot better now. This is my test result from this morning: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5343 Kbps about 5.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 652 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Fri Feb 3 10:32:26 PST 2006 Bottom Line:: 95X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.57 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 81.55 % faster than the average for host (rogers.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LDEJR9HGP I just wanted to say thanks to both of you (trogers and FallowEarth) for all the help you provided, and staying up with me until 3am last night trying to figure out the problem But what do you guys think the problem was and what do you think fixed it? Still seems pretty weird to me haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 3, 2006 CID Share Posted February 3, 2006 It could be wireless interference, EMI from an electrical device, or network congestion. Just keep an eye on what time of day things are better or worse, and what is happening in your house at that time. Ping us back if you have further questions or issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.