Nitro4WD Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Hey all! Changed my ISP to Ukonline a while ago, and all was fine for a while. It's a 2000/256 connection. However, after a major issue my motherboard had with my new RAM (a Corsair 512MB PC3200 chip) and a bad XP crash I had to re-install from a formatted HDD. Now everything is back up and running I'm having trouble... SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer TCP properties for IP = () Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 63888 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 63888 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2555.52 Kbps (319.44 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1022.208 Kbps (127.776 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 56 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873. TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 287.71kB/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 558.14kB/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: The receive buffer should be 270.0 Kbytes to maximize throughput WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 257 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 0 CongAvoid: 0 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 0 CountRTT: 257 CurCwnd: 64240 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 1080 CurRwinRcvd: 63888 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 2147483647 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 788400 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 540 DupAcksIn: 0 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 64240 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 1470 MaxRTT: 1100 MaxRwinRcvd: 63888 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 0 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 630 MinRTT: 220 MinRwinRcvd: 63888 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 257 PktsOut: 540 PktsRetrans: 0 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 0 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 42 SampleRTT: 830 SmoothedRTT: 810 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 8030935 SndLimTimeCwnd: 2356025 SndLimTimeSender: 2601 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 1 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 611740 SndLimBytesCwnd: 176660 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 189480 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 393197 Duration: 10392955 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 15.11 loss: 0.000001000 avgrtt: 737.28 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.0000 rwintime: 0.7730 sendtime: 0.0003 cwndtime: 0.2268 rwin: 0.4874 swin: 0.7891 cwin: 0.4901 rttsec: 0.737276 Sndbuf: 103424 aspd: 2.74283 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.28<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.77>.9], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.0E>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.22>.6], (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.28<9.5] (loss < .01) [1.0E<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [15.11>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.77>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/1=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.77>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.22>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [0>0] estimate = 15.11 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 737.28msec, and loss = 1.0E-6 The theoretical network limit is 15.11 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.07 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 62.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 0.66 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.66 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 744 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 91 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Mon Feb 06 2006 20:58:17 GMT+0000 (GMT Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB download in 11.25 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 31.71 % of your hosts average (co.uk) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-UXG495H86 Yes, I'm connected up via USB, but I've always run a steady stable connection, so that shouldn't be a problem. I've tried using VanBuren's new Cablenut settings, got a couple of extra kB/s, but nothing of note (last time I used a VanBuren setting my speed increased over 20%!). I'm using an up to date XP Proffesional, and the system is a Compaq Presario 2.66GHz Pentium 4, 512MB RAM (it was a GB until the crash...), 400GB drive space spread over 1 40GB, 1 60 GB and a 1 300GB HDD. Thanks in advance for any help offered! Edited by swimmer.. remove IP address Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Post a Tracert to testmy.net and we'll see what we can do... Thanks, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Microsoft® Windows DOS ©Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001. Sorry, forgot that! C:DOCUME~1NITRO>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 42 ms 46 ms 46 ms easynet1-hg3.ilford.broadband.bt.net [217.32.63. 202] 2 46 ms 46 ms 30 ms 217.32.63.162 3 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms 217.32.63.238 4 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms ge0-3-0-0.br0.wslon.uk.easynet.net [212.134.10.1 3] 5 46 ms 62 ms 62 ms ge0-0-0-0.br0.bllon.uk.easynet.net [195.172.211. 209] 6 46 ms 62 ms 62 ms ge0-0-0-0.gr0.bllon.uk.easynet.net [207.162.204. 1] 7 46 ms 62 ms 62 ms ge0-1-0-0.gr0.thlon.uk.easynet.net [207.162.205. 14] 8 75 ms 62 ms 77 ms ge0-0-0-0.gr1.thlon.uk.easynet.net [207.162.198. 13] 9 124 ms 124 ms 124 ms so0-0-0-0.gr1.hsnyc.us.easynet.net [207.162.205. 138] 10 124 ms 124 ms 124 ms ge-8-0-297.core1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.78.160.3 7] 11 140 ms 124 ms 124 ms ae-1-51.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.1] 12 156 ms 156 ms 155 ms as-0-0.bbr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.0.137] 13 156 ms 155 ms 171 ms ae-23-52.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.47] 14 156 ms 155 ms 171 ms 4.78.221.146 15 156 ms 155 ms 155 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 16 156 ms 155 ms 155 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 17 140 ms 155 ms 155 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8 5] 18 140 ms 155 ms 155 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete. C:DOCUME~1NITRO> Cheers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 I think its just the overseas that is making your connection "slow" or maybe i'm wrong.. Try using cablenut...with the settings below..restart and try again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Hi, Do you happened to be located in Cambridge? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Test your speed again at any site in this link, but located in the UK: http://www.testmyspeed.com/speedtests/international.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 One of the core router in the UK is down. That may be the reason why latency to the US is very high: http://www.internettrafficreport.com/history/81.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Hey all! Appreciate all the help I'm getting, but I still have a problem...I applied the 2000/256 Cablenut settings, and I've run some speed tests from that link: http://www.numion.com/YourSpeed3/ShowMeasurement.php?ID=47,578,231 Speed Test (Results) Loaded 2,031K bytes in 26.672 seconds. Your throughput is 624 Kbps. BarChart Expected Results Despite this my results from http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ are more promising... OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 291.27Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.74Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 262.97 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and No packet loss was observed. This connection is receiver limited 85.21% of the time. This connection is network limited 14.76% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Try this ccs file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Sorry Trogers, but that file comes up with all the fields blank? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Try again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Sorry man, it's still blank; opening from location and saving to disk the same...Strangely though, the VanBuren one I had previously used is doing the same thing, so I think it's my end. I've restarted a few times to no avail...this is weird... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Then you will have to enter the values manually from top to bottom and left to right order: 64240 64240 1 100 240 640 819200 64000 150400 0 12800 32 4096 1 1 0 64240 8000 32768 5000000 1 1 0 1 2 100 80 1460 1460 30 0 64240 20 10 64 0 6 240 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 Sorry, haven't been on due to work... Thanks for going to all this effort! I applied those settings and have come up with this: TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 288.62Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 560.71kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: The receive buffer should be 288.99 Kbytes to maximize throughput Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 789.14 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and No packet loss was observed. This connection is receiver limited 77.71% of the time. Increasing the the client's receive buffer (62.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 22.25% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End I'm having trouble with the testmy.net speed tester, it keeps jamming on the "Querying / Sending Data to Database" message... Here's a tracert too; Microsoft® Windows DOS ©Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001. C:DOCUME~1NITRO>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 32 ms 143 ms 65 ms easynet1-hg2.ilford.broadband.bt.net [217.32.63. 201] 2 284 ms 126 ms 315 ms 217.32.63.129 3 64 ms 65 ms 33 ms 217.32.63.234 4 96 ms 63 ms 63 ms ge0-3-0-0.br0.wslon.uk.easynet.net [212.134.10.1 3] 5 32 ms 49 ms 49 ms ge0-0-0-0.br0.bllon.uk.easynet.net [195.172.211. 209] 6 110 ms 125 ms 189 ms ge0-0-0-0.gr0.bllon.uk.easynet.net [207.162.204. 1] 7 125 ms 63 ms 110 ms ge0-1-0-0.gr0.thlon.uk.easynet.net [207.162.205. 14] 8 47 ms 48 ms 48 ms ge0-0-0-0.gr1.thlon.uk.easynet.net [207.162.198. 13] 9 375 ms 313 ms 266 ms so0-0-0-0.gr1.hsnyc.us.easynet.net [207.162.205. 138] 10 312 ms 219 ms 281 ms ge-8-0-297.core1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.78.160.3 7] 11 452 ms 389 ms 421 ms ae-1-51.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.1] 12 156 ms 140 ms 140 ms ae-0-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [64.159.1.109] 13 185 ms 232 ms 233 ms ae-13-55.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.143] 14 155 ms 155 ms 139 ms 4.78.221.146 15 155 ms 202 ms 169 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 16 264 ms 154 ms 154 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 17 139 ms 139 ms 139 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8 5] 18 325 ms 412 ms 354 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85 ] Trace complete. I got this from a uk testing site (http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp) before the tester jammed... Analysing your connection... Testing downstream speed... Downloaded 1572864 bytes in 17035ms (721 kbps) Testing upstream speed... Uploaded 153333 bytes in 4925ms (243 kbps) Firefox is struggling to run any more than two tabs (usually regularly runs two or three browsers full of 'em without problems), and connections to anything bandwidth intensive are very slow... I've run a host of spyware, adware and antivirus progs (adaware, spybot, microsoft antispy, avg etc), and have Kerio Firewall and Ewido and Counterspy live malware guards on all the time. Any further help will be really appreciated, as i'm going crazy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|3v|lon3| Posted February 12, 2006 CID Share Posted February 12, 2006 TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 291.27kB/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.74Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem thats good for overseas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 13, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 13, 2006 Strange thing is it only happened that one time, otherwise it's been consistantly between 500-750Mb/s download... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 13, 2006 CID Share Posted February 13, 2006 Go to this link and download the TCP Optimizer: https://www.speedguide.net/downloads.php Open the TCP Optimizer and do the following: General Settings tab: Custom settings - check Modify All Network Adapters - check network adapter selection - your NIC MTU 1500 TTL - 64 TCP Receive Window -128480 MTU Discovery - Yes Black Hole Detect - No Selective Acks - Yes Max Duplicate ACKs - 2 TCP 1323 Options: Windows Scaling - check Timestamps - uncheck Advanced Settings tab: Max Connections per Server - 10 Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20 LocalPriority - 5 Host Priority - 6 DNSPriority - 7 NetbtPriority - 8 Lan Browsing speedup - optimized QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0 ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 240 MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0 NetFailureCacheTime - 0 NegativeSOACache Time - 0 LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768 Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 13, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 13, 2006 Hey, Did all of the above, got this: TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 289.04Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 551.54kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: The receive buffer should be 291.95 Kbytes to maximize throughput Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_06 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 797.23 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and No packet loss was observed. This connection is receiver limited 73.72% of the time. Increasing the the client's receive buffer (62.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 26.24% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End I'm calling the ISP now, maybe they've got a duff server or something...Will post soon! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 13, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 13, 2006 Just got off the phone with Ukonline, they got me to run the line providers test (British Telecom) which came up with the same (slow) results. Despite me paying for a half hour phone call something has at least been looked at, but it's now in BT's hands as it's their hardware and not UKonline's. If anyone in the UK is using a Broadband connection that runs through a BT line, these login details will get you to their line speed tester if it's any use: Username: speedtest@speedtest_domain Password: dsl URL: http://speedtester.bt.com If however anyone still has suggestions for my connection (as it may not be BT's fault) they will be appreciated! Cheers Trogers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 13, 2006 CID Share Posted February 13, 2006 Your Round trip time = 797.23 msec. Usually RTT < 300 ms from computers of overseas users. High round trip time usually points to poor line quality or electromagnetic interference on your signal cables or modem/router. Make sure modem and router are place a few feet apart. Check to see ensure other electrical devices are not placed near to them (eg. subwoofer, speakers, cordless phone, fax...etc). If using wireless, interference in signal transmission to router can be a possibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro4WD Posted February 15, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 15, 2006 Thanks for the advice! However, Everything in that department is ok, all is routed as well isolated as it can be. Plus it's exactly as it was when I was running a true 2Mb/s originally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.