PolaSeeds Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 can anyone help me by pointin me into the right direction to get the right cablenut setting?? 576kbs down 288 kbs up on a PPPoA wireless network. Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 Hi, Post your speed test and TCP Analyzer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 The current date is: 07/02/2006 The current time is: 22:39:52.46 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=138ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=46 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=46 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 131ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 136ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms BelkinModem.Belkin [192.168.2.1] 2 22 ms 28 ms 28 ms rt-lostb18.dial.aol.com [195.93.23.50] 3 * 24 ms * iptfarmlb-los-ve3.proxy.aol.com [195.93.17.62] 4 25 ms 27 ms 38 ms 172.17.169.27 5 29 ms 29 ms 27 ms pop1-loh-S1-2-0.atdn.net [66.185.143.193] 6 30 ms 27 ms 30 ms bb1-loh-S0-0-0.atdn.net [66.185.136.224] 7 26 ms 30 ms 27 ms pop2-loh-S0-0-0.atdn.net [66.185.136.241] 8 27 ms 27 ms 29 ms savvis.atdn.net [66.185.143.94] 9 25 ms 29 ms 27 ms bcs1-so-2-1-0.Londonlnx.savvis.net [204.70.193.118] 10 27 ms 94 ms 101 ms bcs2-so-0-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.192.121] 11 96 ms 105 ms 94 ms bcs2-so-0-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.192.121] 12 99 ms 120 ms 107 ms bcs2-so-4-0-0.Washington.savvis.net [204.70.192.1] 13 144 ms 142 ms 143 ms dcr2-so-7-2-0.Atlanta.savvis.net [204.70.192.57] 14 136 ms 144 ms 142 ms bcs2-so-2-0-0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.70] 15 131 ms 142 ms 142 ms dpr1-as0-0.dallasequinix.savvis.net [204.70.193.214] 16 142 ms 142 ms 139 ms aer1-po10.DallasEquinix.savvis.net [204.70.134.14] 17 133 ms 142 ms 145 ms 208.175.175.42 18 151 ms 131 ms 143 ms vl31.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.29] 19 131 ms 143 ms 143 ms vl32.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 20 134 ms 164 ms 133 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 21 138 ms 141 ms 142 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.85] 22 143 ms 143 ms 141 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. i think this is wat you mean? this is my download speed :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 476 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 58 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Tue Feb 7 22:43:16 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB download in 17.66 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 9.19 % of your hosts average (aol.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9HBETVIF0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natenay Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 buddy look at mine and im not on dial-up, i need help ASAP watch!!!!! :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 134 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Download Speed is:: 16 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Tue Feb 7 17:43:37 EST 2006 Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB download in 64 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 12.49 % of your hosts average (bell.ca) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MO3V78UR6 now thats bad, i need help:( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natenay Posted February 7, 2006 CID Share Posted February 7, 2006 someone that can help me as much as possible e-mail me at [email protected] plz! that is no joke! thats my speed/connection! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 8, 2006 CID Share Posted February 8, 2006 Need to know your present MTU and RWIN setting. Do this test and post results: https://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 TCP options string = 020405840103030101010402 MTU = 1452 MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput. If you are using a router, it could be limiting your MTU regardless of Registry settings. MSS = 1412 MSS is not optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 128000 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 1 bits (scale factor of 2) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64000 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 519616 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 8 ) 259808 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 4) 129904 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 2) 64952 (MSS x 46) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 5120 Kbps (640 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 2048 Kbps (256 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 We first have to adjust your MTU to 1500. Go to this link and download the TCP Optimizer: https://www.speedguide.net/downloads.php Open the TCP Optimizer and do the following: General Settings tab: Custom settings - check Modify All Network Adapters - check network adapter selection - your NIC MTU 1500 TTL - 64 TCP Receive Window -blank MTU Discovery - Yes Black Hole Detect - No Selective Acks - Yes Max Duplicate ACKs - 2 TCP 1323 Options: Windows Scaling - uncheck Timestamps - uncheck Advanced Settings tab: Max Connections per Server - 10 Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20 LocalPriority - 5 Host Priority - 6 DNSPriority - 7 NetbtPriority - 8 Lan Browsing speedup - optimized QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0 ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 240 MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0 NetFailureCacheTime - 0 NegativeSOACache Time - 0 LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768 Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect Then retest with https://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php to confirm your MTU is 1500. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 472 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 58 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Thu Feb 9 12:06:25 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB download in 17.66 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 9.09 % of your hosts average (aol.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IFDN0CYSP TCP options string = 020405840103030e01010402 MTU = 1452 MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput. If you are using a router, it could be limiting your MTU regardless of Registry settings. MSS = 1412 MSS is not optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 1073725440 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 14 bits (scale factor of 28) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65535 For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 519616 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 259808 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 4) 129904 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 2) 64952 (MSS x 46) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 42949017.6 kbps (5368627.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 17179607.04 kbps (2147450.88 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Did you use the TCP Optimizer as shown above and adjust your MTU value? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 of course i did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 What brand and model is your modem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 A belkin wireless F5D7632-4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Try this ccs file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 461 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 56 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2) Test Time:: Thu Feb 9 16:04:03 UTC 2006 Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB download in 18.29 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 8.88 % of your hosts average (aol.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1LZXCS3PW TCP options string = 0204058401010402 MTU = 1452 MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput. If you are using a router, it could be limiting your MTU regardless of Registry settings. MSS = 1412 MSS is not optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 31064 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 31064 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 519616 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 259808 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 4) 129904 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 2) 64952 (MSS x 46) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 1242.56 kbps (155.32 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 497.024 kbps (62.128 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Try this ping test: ping -f -l 1472 www.testmy.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 how i clicked the link and it took me to the testmy.net home page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 LOL...no. you have to click 'Start" and "Run" and a box will appear. Type "cmd" in the box and click 'ok'. A DOS box will pop up. After the C: type "ping -f -l 1472 www.testmy.net" and press 'enter'. Post the result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 cant get it to work lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 This other ccs file is the best I can do for you. The ping test is to see if your MTU is 1500. If it does not work, your MTU is only 1452 as imposed by your modem/router. Not a optimum value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 no good must be the the modem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 MTU = 1452 MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput. If you are using a router, it could be limiting your MTU regardless of Registry settings. MSS = 1412 MSS is not optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 31064 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 31064 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 519616 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 259808 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 4) 129904 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 2) 64952 (MSS x 46) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 1242.56 kbps (155.32 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 497.024 kbps (62.128 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 54 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 11110000 (240) Precedence (priority) = 111 (Network Control) Delay = 1 (low delay) Throughput = 0 (normal throughput) Reliability = 0 (normal reliability) Cost = 0 (normal cost) Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero) DiffServ (RFC 2474) = No valid DiffServ equivalent. See the TCP Optimizer documentation, or RFCs 2474, 2475, 2597, 2598, 2873 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 PolaSeeds:This is what the cmd or MSDOS screen looks like.My ISP blocks ping so I can't show test results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 9, 2006 CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 Thanks cholla. PolaSeeds, the reason why it cannot work is you used a -1 (minus one) instead of a -l (minus small L). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolaSeeds Posted February 9, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 9, 2006 i did use a small L and still no good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.