etiolate Posted March 10, 2006 CID Share Posted March 10, 2006 i just applied the cablenut tweak with the van buren css: Verizon_Fios_PPPoE_15000_2000 and now my speed is horrible. i tried to restore the registry, and im still getting crappy speeds: Your connection is: 9420 Kbps or 9.4 Mbps You Downloaded at: 1150 kB/s You are running: 168 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 0.89 second(s) Member Ident: Username:etiolate CompID:6525866394 Test Time:: 2006/03/10 - 1:37pm Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Test ID: FGPWQ7VSJ (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) anyone give me a hand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asubaseball727 Posted March 10, 2006 CID Share Posted March 10, 2006 Did you restart your computer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brock01 Posted March 10, 2006 CID Share Posted March 10, 2006 very good question asus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan314 Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 If they dont work.. try using different settings.. if not use tcp optimizer lol I personally like cable nut and tcp optimizer.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 11, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 I did restart my computer, and ive tried it about 5 times now. i even restored the registry, and im still getting the same speeds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ixnayspyder Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 isn't FIOS way better than a good cable connection? Why are you concerned with tweaking it to be even better? :-/ Wish we had FIOS here....instead w are stuck with Comcast cable, or DSL......and I miss Comcast Also, try the test in IE as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 11, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 i was just curious, and i was getting around 13mbs so i was trying to get it back up to 15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 Its very easy to restore all settings back to windows default with cablenut just click "delete cablenut tweaks" after that click "save to registry" and now reboot the PC when thats done, run this analyser and post the result https://www.speedguide.net:8080/ also make a speedtest VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 11, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 wow, this is getting worse. I just deleted cablenut tweaks, and rebooted. TCP properties for IP = 71.245.183.156 () Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 17424 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 696.96 Kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 278.784 Kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband. MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 123 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2605 Kbps about 2.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 318 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 8:56am Bottom Line:: 47X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.22 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 9.407 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 51.96 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5KO3491RC :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1193 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 146 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 9:17am Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 7.01 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.27488 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 80.21 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P5HXYVCD7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 wow, this is getting worse. I just deleted cablenut tweaks, and rebooted. TCP properties for IP = 71.245.183.156 () Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405ac01010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 17424 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 17424 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 696.96 Kbps (87.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 278.784 Kbps (34.848 KBytes/s) @ 500ms Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband. MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 123 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2605 Kbps about 2.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 318 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 8:56am Bottom Line:: 47X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.22 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 9.407 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 51.96 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5KO3491RC :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1193 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 146 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 9:17am Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 7.01 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.27488 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 80.21 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P5HXYVCD7 yea, windows XP default RWIN when you run your NIC at 10Mbps is very low try these settings VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 11, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 im running windows 2000 pro. are you saying i should have my nic set to 100bastx full duplex? heres what i got after i applied that css: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9712 Kbps about 9.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 1186 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 9:57am Bottom Line:: 173X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.86 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.047 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 93.77 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5RSQL1YDW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 im running windows 2000 pro. are you saying i should have my nic set to 100bastx full duplex? i suggest you leave it in "auto" I have seen some people with w2k having speed problems with AFD tweaking If the speed is still not good with the file i posted above, try this file this file is not based upon AFD tweaking. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 11, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 i noticed my cpu was up around 80% - 100% while running those tests. what the hell is up with that. firefox hogs it all up :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 14655 Kbps about 14.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1789 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:19am Bottom Line:: 262X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.57 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.797 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 192.4 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4D2QMEYZJ :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1221 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 149 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:20am Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 6.87 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.03488 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.44 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PHX9DCMBK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 11, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 Hey, thanks for all your help. looks like my speeds are about where they were before. im just having a problem with browsing the web now. everything is super slow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 i noticed my cpu was up around 80% - 100% while running those tests. what the hell is up with that. firefox hogs it all up :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 14655 Kbps about 14.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1789 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:19am Bottom Line:: 262X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.57 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.797 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 192.4 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4D2QMEYZJ :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1221 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 149 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/11 - 10:20am Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 6.87 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.03488 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 84.44 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PHX9DCMBK try this http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?ni=1&tt=1&s=12160&st=st&ta=&top=&nobar=1 see if that using less CPU its a test without progressbar. you can try lower the TcpWindowsize and GlobalMaxTcpwindowsize to 255552 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevcha Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 VanBuren, Is there a CSS file that is optimized for FIOS 15/2 for 2k wireless connection? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ixnayspyder Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 Etiolate, what are the specs of your computer? I know when I had Comcast internet on my Dell dimension 2300, (Intel celery 1.8 Ghz, 64mb on board video, 512 MB ram, 40GB HD), my speeds were very very slow (maybe 500 Kb/s range), upgraded to my custom AMD system (AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1GB ram, 160 GB HD, 40GB HD, ATI radeon 9550) $600 later, my speeds jumped to over 1Mb/s avg. from any decent server with the same connection. And yes that was in Firefox With most of today's basic computers even, I don't see why the CPU would be getting used up that much unless there are some adware/spyware type problems involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 11, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 my machine is getting kinda old. amd xp1700+, 1gb ddr, nvidia Ti200. i also have a powerbook that runs very nice but i can only get around 9mbs on my downloads Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 11, 2006 CID Share Posted March 11, 2006 VanBuren, Is there a CSS file that is optimized for FIOS 15/2 for 2k wireless connection? yes, all my files should work with or without wireless VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 12, 2006 ive been checking my speeds alday, and theyve been fluctuating anywhere between 10 and 14. is that normal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ixnayspyder Posted March 12, 2006 CID Share Posted March 12, 2006 guess that depends on how high the traffic is through the ISP, assuming it works the same as with cable and dsl (higher ammounts of traffic= slower speeds) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 12, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 12, 2006 anything i can do to get my upload a littler quicker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted March 12, 2006 CID Share Posted March 12, 2006 anything i can do to get my upload a littler quicker? try this, set DefaultSendWindow to 63888 you can also try 128000 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.