VanBuren Posted April 8, 2007 CID Share Posted April 8, 2007 Im happy to just passed 10k, after some OC of videocard and CPU My videocard single 320MB 8800 GTS is the weak link, with all default i get 9500p so lack of memory is the problem http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1644900 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kamil234 Posted April 8, 2007 CID Share Posted April 8, 2007 8876 after OC processor/vid card Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted April 8, 2007 CID Share Posted April 8, 2007 I have to wait until Tuesday But I will add my results as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buntz Posted April 8, 2007 CID Share Posted April 8, 2007 7517 on my one year old socket 939 AMD rig. X2 4400+ OC to 2774 2 x Evga 7800GT SLI OC to 480/1197 http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?projectType=14&projectId=1646130 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x_6985381 Posted April 9, 2007 CID Share Posted April 9, 2007 Heres my results as I promised for the Intel Core2Duo and 7600GS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted April 21, 2007 Author CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 OC the GPU even more, with some luck i pass 11k some day http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1750296 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kamil234 Posted April 21, 2007 CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 how far did you get your gpu to van? i pushed mine to 660 core 2100 memory stable (500 core/1600 mem stock) anything higher would artifact i have eVga 8800GTS 640MB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted April 21, 2007 Author CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 how far did you get your gpu to van? i pushed mine to 660 core 2100 memory stable (500 core/1600 mem stock) anything higher would artifact i have eVga 8800GTS 640MB i didnt push much, i set the memory to 1000 and core at 620 at first, but then i saw artifacts so i lowered core to 605 maybe i should have lowered the memory and increased core, i dunno whats best. temps got up, gpu was around 80 C idle, dont want to know the temps on load lol VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kamil234 Posted April 21, 2007 CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 i meant memory 2100 in DDR so 1050 single data put the fan up to 100% and you're set =] i had 67 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
organ_shifter Posted April 21, 2007 CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 Need more validation links so users with results in the ORB can compare properly. My Compare URL: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1198068 Very nice results Van. Your processor & graphics card are a monster match up. You'll be hitting 11K before the day is over with. Thxz for the link. Don't know if my results will improve with the extra gig of ram I put in. Guess I'll OC and test soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted April 21, 2007 Author CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 Need more validation links so users with results in the ORB can compare properly. My Compare URL: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1198068 Very nice results Van. Your processor & graphics card are a monster match up. You'll be hitting 11K before the day is over with. Thxz for the link. Don't know if my results will improve with the extra gig of ram I put in. Guess I'll OC and test soon. i agree, more links! also a good AGP score are your GPU at stock speed? one more gig should help a bit, but i dont think much almost 11k now here is the latest clock 616/2030 10967p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1751643 think ill give up, dont want to ruin something to pass 11k lol i think the 320MB model i have suffer in these test compared to the 640MB model, but o well games run smooth and thats all i ask for VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kamil234 Posted April 21, 2007 CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 i wish i had your processor. lol you can get the q6600 now for like $500.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted April 21, 2007 Author CID Share Posted April 21, 2007 i wish i had your processor. lol you can get the q6600 now for like $500.. havent seen any tests with the q6600, i assume its locked CPU multiplier on that one its not much benefits with quadcore in 3d, atleast not yet. I bought this quadcore since i plan to have this PC for 5 years. I figured its easy to upgrade the videocards when its needed VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted April 22, 2007 Author CID Share Posted April 22, 2007 You'll be hitting 11K before the day is over with. had to break 11k lol 11096p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1755633 VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted April 22, 2007 CID Share Posted April 22, 2007 had to break 11k lol 11096p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1755633 VanBuren the FSB of ur quad is only 266 MHz is this true ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted April 22, 2007 Author CID Share Posted April 22, 2007 the FSB of ur quad is only 266 MHz is this true ? I dont know, but bus speed seems good, its 4 times the FSB maybe somone here can give some details how memory, bus speeds, fsb, ratios work together VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kamil234 Posted April 22, 2007 CID Share Posted April 22, 2007 i think this is the way it works im not 100% sure tho. bus speed is the speed in which data is transfered in and out of the cpu (usually around 1000MHz?) FSB is the speed in which data is tranfered within the cpu memory as in RAM? the faster the ram the better but. If your FSB is slower then ram speed than your processor will be bottlenecking the ram if ram speed is slower then FSB than your ram is bottlenecking your cpu ratio..dividers.. its the best to keep ram speed to FSB ratio in 1:1 but its hard sometimes so its usually 2:3 or cpu/9 BTW my ratio is 4:5 200mhz FSB and 250mhz ram 11x multiplier on cpu = 2200mhz =] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
organ_shifter Posted April 22, 2007 CID Share Posted April 22, 2007 had to break 11k lol 11096p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1755633 VanBuren I knew you wouldn't stop until you got it. Nice one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.