akuyume Posted October 22, 2007 CID Share Posted October 22, 2007 OK I've got a question that's been driving me crazy. I've got two computers, both with 10/100 Intel integrated network cards and using the SAME network cable plugged directly into my router, one always gets about something like this: then the next one gets this: Now if you're anything like me you're probably wondering the difference between these. The first is a Linux machine (Ubuntu feisty fawn to be precise) and the second is a Windows XP (Media Center) PC. I already know what you're thinking, and I've ran 3 AVs and 4 anti-spywares on the Win machine and strangest bit to me would be that when I switch over to wireless on the Windows machine its speeds go back up: But yet, my actual network speeds (did my own test involving transferring a 100MB file across my network) are fairly identical on both of these computers. Am I missing something or has anyone else noticed this effect? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted October 22, 2007 CID Share Posted October 22, 2007 Id go ahead and check the nic card on the windows box. Wether it be a bad card or just bad/corrupted drivers/system settings. Wireless would be a completely different relm of the card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbear Posted October 26, 2007 CID Share Posted October 26, 2007 haha did the same thing but something different....was sooo surprised by it... First off, my advertised speed is 30/5 MB...and i usually get like 25/4.18 MB Did the test on windows xp pro: Run Ubuntu 7.10 (the new one) LIVE on the same machine and got this: Ubuntu seems to show much much much faster speeds . Whats up with that? Other speed sites show the same speed of Ubuntu but on WinXP Linux-to-Linux = faster internet speeds? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiberOptic Posted October 27, 2007 CID Share Posted October 27, 2007 akuyume, I think it would be a fair representation if you used the same file size each time and on both systems. I have noticed you used, 12160kB on Linux 1013kB on Windows. Have you tried the 40-summot-Mb test on both? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.