RTB Posted June 18, 2004 CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 I'm wondering... How much kbps do you need for smooth gameplay? The reason I'm asking is my inability to play smoothly online. I see (lagometer in Q3) packets dropped about every second and as soon as my dad does something on the net (doesn't matter how small) I still notice it, since a big lagspike hits at that moment. Hard to miss, eh? Could this be the bottleneck? Without firewall (ZA) :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 93 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is: 11 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 2 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 93.09 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=GDQQLGG0V With firewall: :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 97 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is: 12 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 2 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 85.33 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=UC1E9KR5S Pretty random these upload tests... These are the highest I ever got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted June 18, 2004 CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 Are you hosting the game..... because with upload stats like that I strongly reccomend not hosting. Most online games you ssould be fine though... what game are you playing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 18, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 Quake 3 and I'm not hosting. I wouldn't even dare... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted June 18, 2004 CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 Quake 3 and I'm not hosting. I wouldn't even dare... Smart man... Well I would think you would be fine... The game should only be requesting about 5KB/sec of your upload connection... Your average download is 1.5 Mbps and ya got about 95 Kbps upload -- I would think you would be fine. Post your ping to testmy.netand your location -- it looks to me like you have a deepser problem, I just pinged your IP from my house and got 690ms MAX, 212ms MIN, and 331ms AVG --- which is HORRIBLE go to START>RUN>type "COMMAND" enter! > type "ping testmy.net" enter! let me know man --- I get 50ms to testmy.net by the way. If you are on a shard connection try connecting without the router ~~~ post those pings and scores for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 18, 2004 CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 I'm wondering... How much Kbps do you need for smooth gameplay? The reason I'm asking is my inability to play smoothly online. I see (lagometer in Q3) packets dropped about every second and as soon as my dad does something on the net (doesn't matter how small) I still notice it, since a big lagspike hits at that moment. Hard to miss, eh? Could this be the bottleneck? Without firewall (ZA) :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 93 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is: 11 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 2 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 93.09 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=GDQQLGG0V With firewall: :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 97 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is: 12 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 2 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 85.33 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=UC1E9KR5S Pretty random these upload tests... These are the highest I ever got. I used to play quake 3 too, a tip i can give you is keep your cl_maxpacket low, try 20 max 30. that helps me if i play on a laggy server. And use as high rate as possible. If you check the servers info you will see sv_maxrate, some admins set this low (5000 to 10000) to allow 56k players to play aswell, but some using real high (20000-40000) for those servers u will need a dern good connection and low ping. Hope this will help But maby the problem is deeper then that, your ping stabillity seems bad, maby it was just a temporary thing when Cable pinged your IP nr, maby you was downloading i dunno. you can also check ping stabillity here http://www.dslreports.com/tweaks Good luck !!! VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted June 18, 2004 CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 Thank you for helping him VanBuren ~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 18, 2004 CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 Thank you for helping him VanBuren ~~ Np But im not sure yet if i did help him hehe VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 18, 2004 CID Share Posted June 18, 2004 Dern i forgot to add this to my post The rate you setup in your q3config.cfg should not be faster then around 50% of your advertised uploadspeed. if you have 256 Kbps up maximal = 256/8= 32 KB/s = 32000 byte/s The rate in almost all games is set in byte/s. 32000 x 50% = 16000 your rate should be set to 16000 in this case. Why only 50%? as you said your dad using the connection too and, all connections "peak out" when its gettin close to the top speed. Thats not what you want for a good ping and smooth game. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 19, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Pingen naar testmy.net [67.19.36.6] met 32 byte gegevens: Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=157ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=49 Pingstatistieken voor 67.19.36.6: Packets: verzonden = 10, ontvangen = 10, kwijtgeraakt = 0 (0% verlies), Retourtijd bij benadering in milliseconden: Minimum = 154ms, Maximum = 163ms, Gemiddeld = 159ms It's in dutch, but the rest is the same. It's stable right now, but I'll post another ping around 4:00 (gmt+1) and 22:00 too. When did you ping me CA3LE? If Zonealarm was on there's a good chance it slowed the ping speed down and if it was around those times that the net is slow that adds even more to the slowness. I'm indeed behind a router, and I know that lowers speeds a bit. The lagometer spikes got a little lower after I started to disable Zonealarm when playing, but the red spikes are still as common. The server on which I play the most is in Germany, so it has to be quite close to where I live. Thanks for the tips on rates and stuff, but my advertised upload is 384. I get at maximum 1/3rd of that speed. That's part of the problem. Sometimes, the connection's just dead, and when I check the modem the send and/or receive LEDs are constantly on. I have no idea what that is. Edit: I live in the mid-east of the Netherlands, in a town called Apeldoorn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Another fix for lag spikes is to use pb_sleep 500 if you play on PB servers. bring down console hit enter once then type /pb_sleep 500 and hit enter. Try this tweaktest, disable your firewall during test http://www.dslreports.com/tweaks and post the result adress (URL) here so i can see it. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 are most of the servers you play on in the US? I am getting a better ping from you now... I don't think it was ZA or your firewall.. it might have been that I woke up your computer -- I am getting about 215 ping now to you... I am in Phoenix AZ which is about 1050 Miles (1690 kilometers) from my house (50ms electronic time ) and you are getting 160 ms to my server ~ I am getting 50 ms to my server so your ping to me is about 210-215 ~~ exactly what I am getting to you right now ~~~ your ping seems good enough to play even on a Westcoast US server ~~ But for online gaming I would try (if you have the option) to stick with east coast servers which should have a ping of about 120 to you if they are good ~ good luck man, hope your connection clears up, have you bitched to your ISP yet? - Damon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 19, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 If I play on other servers than the one in Germany, they're in Europe. I get good pings there (30 - 50). http://ttester.broadbandreports.com/tweak/block:59112fc?service=cable&speed=2560&os=win98SE&via=normal Nothing abnormal there... But from 12;00 to 12:15 I had no internet, and it was just like I described. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 That's gotta be driving your crazy... now I know why your signature says "kills self once again" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 19, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Yep. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2278 Kbps about 2.3 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 278 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 41 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 3.68 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=IR0KXTFQ7 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 76 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is: 9 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 1 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 113.78 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=043V0UVEB Back to slow upload. I think the record has been recorded on the database as well, go see if you can find a upload speed of 14 kbps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 As i understand you got win XP now RTB, try changing these values DefaultReceiveWindow - The number of receive bytes that AFD buffers on a connection before imposing flow control. For some applications, a larger value here gives slightly better performance at the expense of increased resource utilization. Value Type: REG_DWORD Default: 4096/8192/8192 2. DefaultSendWindow - This is similar to DefaultReceiveWindow, but for the send side of connections. Value Type: REG_DWORD Default: 4096/8192/8192 The thing you already changed with TCP optimizer is 32. TcpWindowSize - This parameter determines the maximum TCP receive window size offered by the system. The receive window specifies the number of bytes a sender may transmit without receiving an acknowledgment. In general, larger receive windows will improve performance over high (delay * bandwidth ) networks. For highest efficiency, the receive window should be an even multiple of the TCP Maximum Segment Size (MSS). Value Type: REG_DWORD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Btw i forgot to say that above tweaks probl will not help your online gaming much cos they using UDP and not TCP. But it could be nice if you would get a faster upload against testmy.net. For the games, i refer to my prewious post about rate and cl_maxpackets, also use snaps at 20. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 19, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 As i understand you got win XP now RTB' date=' try changing these values[/quote'] There are two computers connected to the net here: One slower, with Win98, and which I use. And one (much) faster, with WinXP, which I hardly use because of instability. Great links, I'm off tweaking Edit: Ouch, that's gotta hurt my ping. Less owning, and a more stable connection... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Well if server using sv_fps 20 then you should use snaps 20, if server has sv_fps 30 you should use snaps 30. defult settings is sv_fps 20, snaps 20, cl_maxpackets 30 but look at server info and try to change these values depending on what server you joining. Good luck with the tweaking !!! VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 19, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Something definatly worked: :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 144 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is: 18 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 3 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 56.89 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=DIBRJU4WN :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 142 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 97 KB) Upload Speed is: 17 KB/sec Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 3 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 60.24 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=O6M2NTPJ5 That's double the speed I was normally getting Testing at chello's testserver showed a less of an improvement, but still visible: 180 kbps upload. But download has worsened. When testing the progress stalls somewhere in the middle and then picks up again. This happened before, but not as often. damn... Edit: Something for everybody to laugh at, download speeds inside the chello network from Chello's own testserver: Per hour Per day 1500 avg, while the advertised speed is 2560. Chello must be happy that so few people do tweak. Everyone beats me in upload speed though Edit2: The 4 o'clock update: Pingen naar testmy.net [67.19.36.6] met 32 byte gegevens: Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=49 Antwoord van 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=49 Pingstatistieken voor 67.19.36.6: Packets: verzonden = 10, ontvangen = 10, kwijtgeraakt = 0 (0% verlies), Retourtijd bij benadering in milliseconden: Minimum = 156ms, Maximum = 175ms, Gemiddeld = 163ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 glad it works better now What did you change and what are your current values? I couldnt see that speed result "UPC TestServer Uw IP adres (213.115.113.70 & (none)) heeft geen toegang tot deze server, omdat het niet in gebruik is door UPC/chello in Nederland. Mocht deze melding naar uw mening niet correct zijn dan kunt u een email sturen aan [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Your IP address (213.115.113.70 & (none)) doesn't have any access to this server, because the IP is not in use by UPC/chello in The Netherlands. If you feel this message was given to you in error, please email to [email protected]" VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Here is my ping stats for testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.19.36.6] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.19.36.6: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.19.36.6: Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 30ms Someone give me a server to ping accross the pond... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 19, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Here ya go.. Pinging chello.nl [213.46.242.72] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Reply from 213.46.242.72: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=240 Ping statistics for 213.46.242.72: Packets: Sent = 23, Received = 23, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 120ms, Maximum = 141ms, Average = 121ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted June 19, 2004 CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 Very nice and stable connection Swimmer RTB, you can try manual set your duplexmode in your NIC; dunno if it has any affect, but i dont trust autosense. Win98/ME: to change to half-duplex: * Open Control Panel. * Double-click Network. * From the scrollable list, select your Ethernet adapter (rather than any dial-up) with a green icon. * Click the button Properties. * Click the tab Advanced to bring it to the front: * In the Property box, the property name to be selected varies according to model of ethernet card. Examples are: Network Link Selection, Media Type, Connection Type, Duplex Mode, or any similarly-named property which can have Values looking like Auto-Negotiation, or 10BT, or 10BaseT. * In the Value box, select a value which either (a) explicitly says half-duplex or semi-duplex, or ( at least does not say full-duplex [e.g. 10BaseT on its own is OK]. If there is a choice between 10 and 100 with half-duplex, choose the 10. Do not choose 10Base5, 10Base2, or AUI. * Click OK to exit the Adapter settings. * Click OK all the way out - you might need to restart. Good luck VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted June 19, 2004 Author CID Share Posted June 19, 2004 It was set at hardware default and I set it to 10/half duplex. Then it asked for the win98 cd and it still couldn't find a file called protman.dos to install. Canceled the install and restarting now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.