Jump to content

CA3LE

Administrator
  • Content count

    9,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Speed Test

    My Results
  • Days Won

    313

Everything posted by CA3LE

  1. CA3LE

    test not accurate

    I see you're getting faster speeds with the multithread speed test -- try running some larger tests with multithread enabled. Manually select between 100 to 200 MB on the download test.
  2. That's nice, call me an idiot. I love giving people a free service and then being called an idiot, fun times. If you hit email on the results page it should send the details of that test, like this. After you click the Email button on the results page, do you see the result details being populated with information like in my screenshot? If your email client is like mine it will group those messages together. But looking at them, you should see the test details.
  3. There isn't a conspiracy. Keep in mind Kiwegapawa, I'm literally one guy in my basement. I'm not involved with any ISPs. In the past I have given ISPs customized tools to better help their customers but you always know what's going on when you test here. There is no favoritism or bias. I DEFINITELY don't delete your results unless they are obviously in error... I do scan results frequently and look for anomalies. If you average 5 Mbps and then all of a sudden you get a 300 Mbps result I gather information from your result to help me understand why it may have happened and work to prevent it in the future. Those results continually become less frequent. (Keeping this in here because it may help someone else in a different situation.) Something catches my eye and it may be the explanation for the missing results. They might not be missing, they might just not be connected to your username. Did you possibly change anything with your modem during that period? Did you put it on a different router or directly to the computer? Basically, did the MAC address of the device it's connected to change? This could cause your IP to change. You were logged out during that period, if your IP changed then the computer ID also changed and then wouldn't be tied to your results unless you've logged a result under that IP. If you think this is possible, TestMy.net does have record of this and in the future you'll be able to see all of that. I actually can't even easily see that myself, I'd need to look at the program to remember how to query it from the database. But it's being logged. Every time your IP changes, signed in or not, it keeps all of those logged. You can see for instance, "on Wed at 2:33a your IP changed from ______ to _______" Never mind, I remembered a way to check for that (with the hidden extraCompID variable). Cross reference says your IP didn't change. Here's mine for reference of what it looks like when it finds that a users IP has changed. How sure are you that those results were in the database? Did you see them in the database or were you expecting to see them there after an automatic speed test run? I did have brief routing/CDN issues in that window so it's possible that the test just didn't run for a couple of cycles during that problem... then when it was resolved your next tests ran normally. When I saw the problem my main test window was fine, it only caused a frame within the window to crash but was able to be recovered as soon as the problem was resolved. I haven't been able to reproduce the error since.
  4. CA3LE

    Export Test Results

    Hey codie, here's a topic that will help... Another older topic... Let me know how it works out for you.
  5. By the way, if you change your DNS settings on your router (instead of the device itself) it will populate to all of your devices. Just make sure the devices are defaulting to the router IP for DNS.
  6. I always use Google's. 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 It's not going to make your connection faster. What can will do it make your DNS lookup faster and more reliable. Google's DNS also updates quickly to any changes that webmasters out there make. DNS is the lookup of the domain name, which then points it to the IP of the server. The speed between the server and you has nothing to do with DNS. When you route your DNS through anyone, keep in mind that they could spy on you with that. Read Google's Public DNS Privacy - https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/privacy But look at this. https://1.1.1.1/ Cloudflare Promises Privacy - https://www.cloudflare.com/privacypolicy/ I might just have to start using cloudflare for my DNS. Doesn't stop your ISP from gathering your web history since DNS isn't encrypted. But it's good to know there's another option for fast, secure DNS; one that's audited yearly... by one of the Big Four auditors (also see KPMG wiki). Let's test them both, first with ping. CA3LE$ ping 8.8.8.8 -c10 PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=121 time=8.678 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=9.347 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=9.599 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=9.768 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=121 time=9.080 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=121 time=9.579 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=121 time=9.694 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=7 ttl=121 time=8.868 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=8 ttl=121 time=9.903 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=9 ttl=121 time=8.937 ms --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.678/9.345/9.903/0.405 ms CA3LE$ CA3LE$ ping 8.8.4.4 -c10 PING 8.8.4.4 (8.8.4.4): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=0 ttl=120 time=9.579 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=120 time=9.260 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=120 time=8.994 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=120 time=8.962 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=120 time=9.750 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=5 ttl=120 time=9.780 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=6 ttl=120 time=8.946 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=7 ttl=120 time=9.475 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=8 ttl=120 time=11.032 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: icmp_seq=9 ttl=120 time=8.900 ms --- 8.8.4.4 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.900/9.468/11.032/0.613 ms CA3LE$ CA3LE$ ping 1.1.1.1 -c10 PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=8.962 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=8.786 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=9.236 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=9.170 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=8.724 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=8.977 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=8.925 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=8.622 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=9.339 ms 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=9.031 ms --- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.622/8.977/9.339/0.216 ms CA3LE$ So Google averaged 9.5 ms, Cloudflare was slightly faster at 9 ms. I compared the DNS queries and cloudflare was faster responding overall. Would you notice a difference? We're talking 18ms vs 27ms. Probably not. connected to cloudflare 1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1 DNS testmy.net avg 0.0183s google avg 0.0177s yahoo avg 0.0173s overall avg 0.01777s (17.77 ms) CA3LE$ time nslookup testmy.net Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.23.102 Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.22.102 real 0m0.020s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.004s CA3LE$ time nslookup testmy.net Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.23.102 Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.22.102 real 0m0.018s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup testmy.net Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.22.102 Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.23.102 real 0m0.017s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s testmy.net avg 0.0183s CA3LE$ time nslookup google.com Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: google.com Address: 172.217.12.14 real 0m0.018s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup google.com Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: google.com Address: 172.217.12.14 real 0m0.018s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup google.com Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: google.com Address: 172.217.12.14 real 0m0.017s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s google avg 0.0177 CA3LE$ time nslookup yahoo.com Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.232 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.9 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.10 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.7 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.8 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.231 real 0m0.017s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup yahoo.com Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.8 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.231 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.232 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.9 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.10 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.7 real 0m0.018s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup yahoo.com Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.7 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.8 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.231 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.232 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.9 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.10 real 0m0.017s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s yahoo avg 0.0173 CA3LE$ ---------------------------------------------- connected to Google 8.8.8.8 & 8.8.4.4 DNS testmy.net avg 0.036 google avg 0.0247 yahoo avg 0.0197 overall avg 0.0268s - (26.8 ms) CA3LE$ time nslookup testmy.net Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.22.102 Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.23.102 real 0m0.040s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup testmy.net Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.23.102 Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.22.102 real 0m0.040s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup testmy.net Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.22.102 Name: testmy.net Address: 104.28.23.102 real 0m0.028s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s testmy.net avg 0.036 CA3LE$ time nslookup google.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: google.com Address: 172.217.12.14 real 0m0.028s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup google.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: google.com Address: 172.217.12.14 real 0m0.028s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup google.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: google.com Address: 172.217.11.238 real 0m0.018s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s google avg 0.0247 CA3LE$ time nslookup yahoo.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.7 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.8 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.231 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.232 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.10 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.9 real 0m0.017s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup yahoo.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.9 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.8 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.10 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.7 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.231 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.232 real 0m0.020s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s CA3LE$ time nslookup yahoo.com Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.231 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.138.219.232 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.8 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.10 Name: yahoo.com Address: 72.30.35.9 Name: yahoo.com Address: 98.137.246.7 real 0m0.022s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s yahoo avg 0.0197 CA3LE$
  7. CA3LE

    Extra Identifier

    Very true, I'll work that into the beta. Thanks for the reminder.
  8. CA3LE

    Dropped tests

    Right now if the auto test encounters unresolved network issues your browser will error and end the test. A better version is coming soon. I've tested the auto speed test with the beta, unplugged the connection, plugged it back in and the test continues without any issue. Right now I'm working to make it log those occurrences. Vote on this (old) topic and you'll be notified when the beta is released.
  9. Took them long enough. ...took me long enough to respond to this too, sorry. I thought I had seen it before but I guess not. I use chrome and firefox mostly. I like the visual reference of the favicon.
  10. CA3LE

    World results

    Hi Hachani! Thanks for being a frequent user. Sorry, there isn't a full country rank listed right now. I hope to make things easier to navigate in the next version. Although, it is possible to query that right now... just have to know the trick. I actually had to look at the code to remember how to do that. Go to https://testmy.net/list and type countrycode in the search field. Then set the minimum number of test to a higher number so only the more popular countries populate. To sort by download, upload or number of recent results click the column title. Sorting that way, the url in the browser ends up being https://testmy.net/rank/countrycode.down/2500 --- the base linking for this is supposed to be listed on the site. So you can just easily navigate to it. I didn't build that in there to be a secret, lol. I'm sorry that's not easily accessible. I'll work on that for you.
  11. CA3LE

    Is my Internet speed accurate?

    I see that you have some results that are higher and some that are much lower 16922292784's Speed Test Results Does Hughes have you running through a proxy? Maybe they're processing it on their end and just relaying the information to the client. Some kind of caching mechanism. I really need to get my hands on a Hughes connection to test this. Maybe a Hughes user would be willing to let me VNC into their desktop and see first hand what's happening on the client-side. If I can witness something I can improve the test for that situation. Can you try a few multithread speed tests for me. Select a couple of US servers, save... then you can go to the download test and test as you normally would. I suggest manually selecting 25 MB and let it run (unless you think it's going to take longer than 90 seconds). I think the real problem is satellite itself, read this forum post in the hughestnet forum. https://community.hughesnet.com/t5/Tech-Support/Trying-to-make-something-work-for-tv-Hulu-Netflix-YouTube-etc/td-p/20589 Downloading raw data and streaming something are different. Streaming can become an issue with the increased latency of satellite connections. (discussing LAN... it's much worse on satellite.) http://www.ihiji.com/how-lan-latency-impacts-streaming-video/ Here's a good read >> https://broadbandnow.com/report/satellite-internet-good-enough-rural-broadband/ I see a lot of people saying that they can stream certain services like YouTube and Netflix just fine but have issues with others. Give us an example of a video you're trying to play. I hear satellite users talking about using NightShift to download streaming content for later viewing and at lower quality to say within data caps. If you try that let us know how it works for you.
  12. CA3LE

    Is my Internet speed accurate?

    Are you seeing results here at TestMy.net that are higher than expected? Or are the results here lower and they're higher on other speed test sites?
  13. Note: Ideally you'll have a 0% ... meaning that your connection ran a flat line with little to no difference between readings. My office connection is usually 0-10%. TestMy.net Test ID : dJA5couwB Here's an example of a faster connection performing worse for its variance. TestMy.net Test ID : eJKLcTXG5 Personally, I prefer a connection that is stable and consistent over one that's faster and fluctuates.
  14. Welcome to testmy.net. Very smart question. Hey, maybe it's not the right way, I'm always open to suggestions... I often put them in practice if they make sense. It's what builds testmy.net. TiP Summary - Minimum :: 1.19 Mbps | Middle :: 3 Mbps | Maximum :: 12.6 Mbps round((12.6 - 1.19)/((12.6 + 1.19)/2)*100) 11.41/6.895*100 = 165% Calculating the difference of the min and max then dividing by the average of the min and max then put into a percentage. This isn't showing you how much your speed fluctuated just between the minimum and maximum... it's accounting for the average over the entire result. So on average your speed fluctuated by 165%. Hope this helps. Do you agree with the logic? Do you think it makes sense to do it that way?
  15. Great article on Motherboard. .. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/d3ewvq/study-shows-how-badly-most-of-the-country-is-getting-ripped-off-by-their-isps How much do you pay and what are your speeds?
  16. CA3LE

    Dropped tests

    An update on this
  17. CA3LE

    Missing results

    function Salt(){ $replace = array("=" => "_","+" => "~", "/" => "-"); $possible = str_shuffle(base64_encode(hex2bin(RandomToken(100)))); return substr(strtr($possible, $replace), 0, 9); } improved.
  18. CA3LE

    Missing results

    If you've seen intermittent test results missing it was most likely an issue with logging on TMN's end. A few members have reported this and I've seen it happen on my end. What was happening? There are so many results logged in the database that test ID's were being assigned that were already logged. In that case TMN won't overwrite the previous result... it just won't log a result. You'd still see your results but they wouldn't be recorded. TMN results will now check the test ID to make sure it hasn't been used before attempting to log the result. It repeats this (a limited number of attempts) until it finds a testID that hasn't been used. The likelihood that it won't find an ID after those attempts is extremely low. But if you ever see it happen again let me know and I can adjust it.
  19. CA3LE

    Missing results

    This was happening far too frequently. There are many millions of results in the database but not nearly enough to account for the frequency this was happening. Even if there were 10,000X as many results in the database, I wouldn't expect to see this. Upon a closer look I realized that the way I was generating test ID's can give bias to certain characters. It's only pseudo random. The naive approach $password = ""; $possible = "~-_0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"; $possible = str_shuffle($possible); $i = 0; while ($i < 9) { $char = substr($possible, mt_rand(0, strlen($possible)-1), 1); if (!strstr($password, $char)) { $password .= $char; $i++; } This uses a random integer to select from a set of N elements. Unless the number of possible random integers is a multiple of N, some characters will have a higher chance of being picked than others. Using newer php functions I'm generating it this way now. function RandomToken($length = 9){ if(!isset($length) || intval($length) <= 8 ){ $length = 9; } if (function_exists('random_bytes')) { return bin2hex(random_bytes($length)); } if (function_exists('mcrypt_create_iv')) { return bin2hex(mcrypt_create_iv($length, MCRYPT_DEV_URANDOM)); } if (function_exists('openssl_random_pseudo_bytes')) { return bin2hex(openssl_random_pseudo_bytes($length)); } } function Salt(){ $replace = array("+" => "~", "/" => "-"); return substr(strtr(base64_encode(hex2bin(RandomToken(9))), $replace), 0, 9); } $password = Salt(); Still room for improvement. I think I might make the string initially larger and then scramble the base64 string before it gets clipped... I think that will improve it even more. Or maybe I find a better way. I feel there will be less of a chance of even being assigned an already logged testID. And if it does happen, as I previously mentioned you'll be assigned a different ID.
  20. CA3LE

    JP

    Thank you for the heads up. This is most likely related to the following topic and should no longer be an issue... I'm working on logging when there are connection issues detected during the test in a future version.
  21. CA3LE

    Who testmy.net is

    I'll work on a page that cites examples for you. They're here, just not compiled nicely for you. I just go off of what many people tell me. There are hundreds of stories (just that I've heard) of people who test perfectly fine using other speed tests and testmy.net reports the correct... much lower number. They email me, often by starting out BLAMING testmy.net. I tell them to trust the results and they usually email me back later, "testmy.net was right." I get blamed whenever someone is slow. The other speed tests misrepresent the numbers so people think I'M the one who's wrong because I'm the outlier. Just because the majority comes to the same answer doesn't mean they do it right. --- testmy.net is often an outlier because it's a real test. And instead of focusing on what they're not doing right... how about we all just use TestMy.net and call it a day?!?! 🤣 I just posted one from the other day to a topic with some other examples I've shared in the past. There are some in other topics in the FAQ / Ask TMN forum When you're having issues and REALLY need testmy.net... that's when it works best and shows how it's truly proprietary. Why anyone uses anything other than TMN with evidence that the others fail when needed the most... makes no sense. Fact is, people just don't know. I try not to be all in your face with the ads. Large portions of the site are purposely ad free (like the forum) and I'm also showing no ads to mobile users.
  22. Is your speedtest working? Hi John, I'm testing normally... everything looks good on my end. When there are issues... my email lights up with user and server generated emails. Looking at https://testmy.net/live and filtering only the server you're using (GB) and I see many people recently posting faster speed. You could have specific routing issues. Also, some issues are more apparent in TestMy.net's results versus other speed tests out there. The most popular speed tests out there aren't giving you a full picture. They combine threads and ignore parts of the result. They are made to benefit the ISP. You can try https://testmy.net/mirror to try other servers or https://testmy.net/multithread to multithread the test. I would also try a different browser. Looks like you used Chrome 67 last, I love Chrome (and that's almost the latest version) but you could still have a problem with it. Try testing with Firefox and see if there's any difference. If there is a big difference, I would go into Chrome settings and reset the browser to default. I've seen bad cable modems show degraded speed on TestMy.net and show normal full speed on other speed tests. This is a very old topic but it's still true today. Same story, different day. Trust the results. My test and servers are the same as always. - Damon - TestMy.net Hi John, Make sure you spread the word. You saw TestMy.net totally in action. Most people have no idea that there is such a difference in internet speed tests. Heck, I had to be told at first by my users because I don't look at what the other speed tests are doing. I don't fully understand all the reasons why TMN seems to detect issues when others tests don't. It just does. In my opinion, after witnessing what you did... it's a wonder why more people don't use TestMy.net. But they don't. I'm coming out with a new version very soon. I've been in private beta testing for a while and will be releasing it to a wider audience. If you'd like to test it early go to the topic below and vote yes... The topic is from the previous beta, those members carry over to the new beta when it's announced. Probably in the next two weeks. As I said, trust the results. - Damon
  23. Dear Prashanth, The reason why all the other tests are showing you the same is because nearly all of the testing sites run the same software. That runs on flash which isn't the best protocol for testing your connection through the browser. Read the following... https://testmy.net/legit-speed-test.php https://testmy.net/ip...m-speedtestnet/ Ookla tests and other flash speed tests can adjust your speed by up to 40% to offset for an unknown variable. If the variable isn't know... how can you offset for it. No matter what, they're guessing at best. TestMy is the only test of its kind in existence. And has been in development for nearly 10 years longer than Oolka (speedtest.net and nearly all other tests online). There could be a lot of reasons this can happen. Bad peering (routing), bad cable modem, MTU could be set wrong... TestMy's results has even been known to reflect issues with hard drives. I encourage you to browse and post in my forum. Read some of the hundreds of posts where people had the same scenario as you, something that other tests missed.... sure enough, they almost always find an issue. https://testmy.net/ipb/ -- post your issue and one of us will help you resolve it. Trust me, it's not my system. Hundreds of millions of tests have been ran and nobody is complaining. https://testmy.net/ipb/public/style_emoticons/#EMO_DIR#/wink.png - Cheers - Damon Mueller - TestMy.net
  24. CA3LE

    Who testmy.net is

    ...not sure, never been there before. 🤣 Hi DJ, Welcome to testmy.net! Yes, that's all still accurate. Millions of people still regularly use TMN, only a small percentage are members. An even smaller percentage of members actually use the forums here. Before facebook, these forums were much more popular. To legitimize any of my statements all you have to do is search the internet. I feel that other people have scrutinized and legitimized what I'm doing over the years, my methodology and core principals never change. Many have put TMN under a microscope. In my development I put it under a microscope too. Maybe I should post more of those findings but if I focused my time on that... it would have to come from somewhere. I think it's better left said by other people. Funding comes from generous support from viewers like you... just kidding, PBS quote. I have ads. Maybe one day I won't have to. TestMy.net has always been developed and maintained by one person.
  25. CA3LE

    automatic test not consistently working

    Sorry for taking a long time to reply. I read your message and wanted to look at your results closer when I was at my main computer. A new topic reminded me that I hadn't responded. Same thing, it's possible that your tests are running but the results can't be logged because the ID is already taken in the database. I'll fix this and also provide a way to show you when your connection really does go down. Maybe by logging a score of zero. I'll let you know when that's fixed.
×
Speed Test Version 15.9
© 2018 TestMy Net LLC - TestMy.net - Terms & Privacy