mrkcee Posted November 2, 2005 CID Share Posted November 2, 2005 Hey guys.. Nice site you guys have here.. I have been reading some posts here about Dial-Up tips/speeds/etc.. Great stuff.. anyways, i tried some tips.. i have a 56k modem.. connects at 50.6kbps.. i disabled hardware compression. etc.. and did some tests.. here's what i got: No Settings, w/ firewall - Under Firefox: at (50.6kbps) :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 38 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:20:11 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (195.60) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NERXYVM7T VanBurens version 7 56k dialup - Under Firefox: at (50.6kbps) =======1st try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 16 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 2 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:26:40 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 0X faster than 56K 1MB download in 512 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 2.96 % of your hosts average (194.38) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YONG7JKP9 =======2nd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 29 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 4 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:27:40 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 256 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 5.81 % of your hosts average (194.38) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6STH7ZI9K =======3rd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 33 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 4 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:28:46 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 256 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 7.13 % of your hosts average (194.38) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BIRLVHKNM No Settings Again, w/o firewall- Under Firefox: at (50.6kbps) =======1st try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 40 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:00:59 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 42.86 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B26ZUHVXM =======2nd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 41 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:02:25 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.13 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I7CWXO0NU =======3rd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 40 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:03:19 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 21.21 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BZH1L9N3V =======4th try - NO BAR======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 40 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:04:15 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 17.65 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PD1OKH0JC is there anyway i can get a higher speed? thanks.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted November 2, 2005 CID Share Posted November 2, 2005 Welcome mrkcee; it is a neat site(if you like tweaking and sharing/reading experiences). Noticed your Test time (China Standard Time) , are you really testing from China? If so, that might explain some of your speed results. I 'seem' to get faster speed scores ~ using VanBuren's XP DSL low-end settings. Good ISP connect status , (but distance to the US test servers will effect your test scores, not to mention China's Internet filtering protocal, for lack of a better censurable peoples resolution, . . .if you are connecting from 'The Peoples Republic'?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrkcee Posted November 3, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 I am not from China.. but from the Philippines. Hmm.. what do you mean g VanBuren's XP DSL low-end settings? The "Cable & DSL 64 64.ccs" and "Cable & DSL 512 128.ccs"? Any ideas? EDIT: How do you use cablenut? I plan to test settings that will work for me.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khronic Posted November 3, 2005 CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 Hey guys.. Nice site you guys have here.. I have been reading some posts here about Dial-Up tips/speeds/etc.. Great stuff.. anyways, i tried some tips.. i have a 56k modem.. connects at 50.6Kbps.. i disabled hardware compression. etc.. and did some tests.. here's what i got: No Settings, w/ firewall - Under Firefox: at (50.6Kbps) :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 38 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:20:11 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (195.60) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NERXYVM7T VanBurens version 7 56k dialup - Under Firefox: at (50.6Kbps) =======1st try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 16 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 2 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:26:40 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 0X faster than 56K 1MB download in 512 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 2.96 % of your hosts average (194.38) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YONG7JKP9 =======2nd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 29 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 4 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:27:40 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 256 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 5.81 % of your hosts average (194.38) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6STH7ZI9K =======3rd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 33 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 4 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 01:28:46 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 256 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 7.13 % of your hosts average (194.38) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BIRLVHKNM No Settings Again, w/o firewall- Under Firefox: at (50.6Kbps) =======1st try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 40 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:00:59 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 42.86 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-B26ZUHVXM =======2nd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 41 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:02:25 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.13 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I7CWXO0NU =======3rd try======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 40 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:03:19 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 21.21 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BZH1L9N3V =======4th try - NO BAR======== :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 40 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 5 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 03 2005 02:04:15 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 204.8 sec Diagnosis: Looks Great : 17.65 % faster than the average for host (194.85) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PD1OKH0JC is there anyway i can get a higher speed? thanks.. What's your cablenut settings??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrkcee Posted November 3, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 Settings? None at the moment. But I am trying out what ROM-DOS said.. the low-end DSL settings of VanBuren.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted November 3, 2005 CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 You can download Cablenut_408_zipped.zip here > http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;attach=64 and VanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_7_ALL_WIN_OS_AND_SAT.zip here > http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;attach=2784 EDIT: How do you use cablenut? ~ just click on the.ccs file you want to try and it will load into CableNut Adjuster, then press "Save to Registry", then "Done" ~ then re-start your computer for the 'new' settings to take effect. For faster speeds I use Cable & DSL 512 128.ccs I think this is it(my settings on my C:Drive) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrkcee Posted November 3, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 I already have those files. Thanks anyways! how did you get/ did you arrive at your settings? what did you do? trial and error? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted November 3, 2005 CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 I used to have Comcast HS cable and tweaked it past it's cap, so when I went back to Dial-Up I just continued to tweak things. (some settings probably just remained the same in my Registry) . . .at first, I thought, am I just 'foolin' Windows ~ thinkin' it still thinks I'm connected on HS cable ~ lol. here's a link to a post I started; "New 'Dial-up' Speed Record" in "Show off your scores!" http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=8475.0 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 181 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Download Speed is:: 22 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 3 06:19:24 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB download in 46.55 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 141.33 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-04I6ELD83 but, of course, this is probably what I'm really running at; :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 62 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 8 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 3 06:12:29 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB download in 128 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 82.67 % of your hosts average (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZI37DM9O1 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 24 Kbps about 0 Mbps (tested with 97 kB) Upload Speed is:: 3 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Nov 3 06:25:12 PST 2005 Bottom Line:: 0X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 341.33 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 26.32 % faster than the average for host (nocharge.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-DB2KCV7NR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrkcee Posted November 3, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 Ahh.. I see. Did you only use CableNut to tweak? or you did some manual tweaking as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROM-DOS Posted November 3, 2005 CID Share Posted November 3, 2005 Here's some Registry tweaks, if your comfortable doing this. Just export the keys and save in some Registry Back-up folder in "My Documents" for back-up and enter the 'new' values in your Registry. By default Windows XP caches everything in the DNS cache service, both correct and faulty DNS lookups. To increase performance by eliminating the caching of faulty DNS lookups, change the following values from whatever their original values are to zero. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesDnscacheParameters] "NegativeCacheTime"=dword:00000000 "NetFailureCacheTime"=dword:00000000 "NegativeSOACacheTime"=dword:00000000 This tweak will help web pages load faster, it has no real effect on download speeds, just helps your pc look up websites faster thereby speeding up how fast the page loads. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesTcpipServiceProvider On the right > change these entries: (ALL values are HEXIDECIMAL) Class - 1 DnsPriority - 1 HostsPriority - 1 LocalPriority - 1 NetbtPriority - 1 Max your Internet Explorer's simultaneous downloads to 20 (default is 2) HKEY_CURRENT_USERSoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionInternet Settings] MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server"= REG_DWORD 0x00000014 (20) MaxConnectionsPerServer"= REG_DWORD 0x00000014 (20) Increase IoPageLockLimit (disk cache) Note- Use the following settings depending on your system RAM: 00020000 = 131072 KB (if RAM > 512 MB) *00010000 = 65536 KB (if RAM > 256 MB) < use this one if you have 512 MB of Memory - RAM 00008000 = 32768 KB (if RAM > 128 MB) 00004000 = 16384 KB (if RAM > 64 MB) 00002000 = 8192 KB (if RAM > 32 MB) 00001000 = 4096 KB (if RAM < 32 MB) HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlSession ManagerMemory Management] "IoPageLockLimit"=dword:00010000 Optimize L2 Cache Detection (Manual) Note: Change the setting depending on the L2 Cache of your CPU. If you dont know the L2 cache of your CPU, use a freeware program like CPU-Z http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php 8192 KB = 00002000 4096 KB = 00001000 2048 KB = 00000800 1024 KB = 00000400 *512 KB = 00000200 256 KB = 00000100 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlSession ManagerMemory Management] "SecondLevelDataCache"=dword:00000200 These are just some of the tweaks I use. . .see if they help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrkcee Posted November 4, 2005 Author CID Share Posted November 4, 2005 Ok.. Gonna try that out when I get home. Im planning to change my settings manually.. settings like the MTU, MSS, RWIN, Windows Scaling... (I like to do things manually.. haha.. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted November 4, 2005 CID Share Posted November 4, 2005 mrkcee: These work better on my OS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted November 4, 2005 CID Share Posted November 4, 2005 hexadecimal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted November 4, 2005 CID Share Posted November 4, 2005 Are they D words or Binary Values in XP mine are Binary Values in Windows ME.In Windows ME only the DWord has a hexadecimal setting. The examples I have seen on the web tweaks look like this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted November 4, 2005 CID Share Posted November 4, 2005 MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server= REG_DWORD 0x00000014 (20) MaxConnectionsPerServer= REG_DWORD 0x00000014 (20) the digit 4 in the dword pretty much precludes it being binary, and hex 14 is dec 20... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted November 4, 2005 CID Share Posted November 4, 2005 MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server= REG_DWORD 0x00000014 (20) MaxConnectionsPerServer= REG_DWORD 0x00000014 (20) the digit 4 in the dword pretty much precludes it being binary, and hex 14 is dec 20... I know the 2 above are DWords I was asking about the other tweak Class=1 LocalPriority = 1 HostsPriority = 1 DnsPriority = 1 NetbtPriority = 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted November 5, 2005 CID Share Posted November 5, 2005 k, thought you meant the whole thing was binary. but then this looks weird too. LocalPriority = 1 Binary Value looks like this 01 00 00 00 HostsPriority = 2 Binary Value looks like this 02 00 00 00 DnsPriority = 3 Binary Value looks like this 03 00 00 00 NetbtPriority = 4 Binary Value looks like this 04 00 00 00 the binary values for 1,2,3 and 4 would be 1, 10, 11 and 100 respectively. so the 04 00 00 00 looks real weird... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted November 5, 2005 CID Share Posted November 5, 2005 resopalrabotnick : The tweak the one I have is supposed to set the priority order..The one you see most sets the priority of all of them to 1 but since they all can't have first priority At least I don't believe they can. I could probably find the tweak on the web & post a link to it .The cablenut site says all should be 1. To give an example I will put the original settings like they were before I did the tweak. Class Binary Value looks like this 8 00 00 00 LocalPriority Binary Value looks like this f3 01 00 00 HostsPriority Binary Value looks like this f4 01 00 00 DnsPriority Binary Value looks like this d0 07 00 00 NetbtPriority Binary Value looks like this d1 07 00 00 In Windows 9x & ME Binary Value is a seperate setting or category in the registry.There are 3 types DWord,String Value & Binary Value .In DWord you can select Hexadecimal or Decimal. The tweak seems to work like I have it for my OS I tried it all set to 1 & it didn't work as well for me. But XP might work better all set to 1 I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted November 5, 2005 CID Share Posted November 5, 2005 well, your original values are hexadecimal, 4 bytes each. each byte is represented by a 2 digit hexadecimal value. binary it would be much longer, you would need 8 digits for each byte. that is mainly why the hexadecimal system is used in this context, it can elegantly represent the 256 (dec) possible values the sequence of 8 bits can represent in 2 alphanumeric digits, each with a value of 0 to f. edit I know the 2 above are DWords I was asking about the other tweak Class=1 LocalPriority = 1 HostsPriority = 1 DnsPriority = 1 NetbtPriority = 1 these look like boolean values to me, where they use only a single bit 0 or 1 to signify true or false, in this case off or on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cholla Posted November 6, 2005 CID Share Posted November 6, 2005 resopalrabotnick; The link is basically the same tweak I use but instead of 1,2,3,4 it uses 5,6,7,8.Or like some suggest like cablenut all set to 1. https://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=1130 Below is a description of registry settings in 9x & its the same in ME. Table 31.3 Windows 98 registry data types Data type Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts