VanBuren

only use DC++ no spyware and great hubs with certain rules... VanBuren

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3353 Kbps about 3.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 409 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 60 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.5 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=LK6JPWHU4 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3605 Kbps about 3.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 440 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 64 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.33 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=4GQMC0SK8 VanBuren

:::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 1536 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Upload Speed is: 188 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 27 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 5.45 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=ESPOSWB6B small file auto forward me to next size but i made a ss. VanBuren

Hey JTP and welcome to the forum Nice to see a Swede here, havent seen one since i started to hang around here lol That score is cached, your on Telia right? What is your cap? I have seen your average scores VanBuren

try again i changed some settings http://thegamer.serveftp.com/ VanBuren

I think government has to pay a part of the fiber to homes, cos its too expensive for most ppl. Atleast in more unurban areas, in big citys the install / customer should be alot less If our government didnt pay 50% of all installation costs im sure that i would have adsl right now, and fiber would just be installed only in the big citys. i live in a small village 20 KM from Lule

yea smile There is no way to tell what best RWIN is, calculating it is the best way to go, 128480 usally work good in that range, this is why i dont like TCP Optimizer, it has fixed RWIN values no matter what bandwidth you got. did you turn off windows scaling when you changed RWIN? quote from my guide "If your calculated RWIN is above 65535, you need to set Tcp13230pts to 1." so you should set it to 0 now. VanBuren

yea but it will get cheaper as more and more ISP dig fiber, bandwidth in US today is very overpriced, compared to scandinavia and japan. Middle Europe also has overpriced bandwidth. OR we are underpriced in scandinavia and japan hehe VanBuren

open cablenut adjuster go to options, choose Operating system click win 2000 click ok now in top left corner choose file, open custome settings file, browse to cable&dsl win xp 2k MSS 1460 and choose 3000 384 file now click save to registry and reboot good luck VanBuren

thought i share some pictures from fiber to homes install in my village 2002 http://www.lulea.se/lulea/luleakommun/verksamhet/bredband_glesbygd/pilot/faltbilder.asp VanBuren

you said it yourself, this is what you said in another post "my actual download speed is 1.3 Mbits even though to the eyes of the world (Particularly my customers) my conection is of 15 MBits. Trust me, nothing illegal here, not even the software installed on my computers, just having fun legally. If you are interested, what this softeare does, is to download only a small part of the images,somehow like zipping the images from the internet, the result is a poorly displayed image , but you wouldn

look here 8.25 MB/s and my netgraph shows 98% of 10 Mbps 8.25MB/s = 8,25 x 8 = 66 Mbps ( speedmeter ) true speed 1250x0,98 = 1,225 MB/s = 1.225x8 = 9,8 Mbps VanBuren

luwigie had a DW 4000 and tested speed against a swedish server and he got crappy result in TCP but in UDP he had 10 Mbps downstream that make me think its possible to go fast even tho its alot harder in TCP, cos you need to shake hands several times with server and client (sending acknowledge packets). VanBuren

good job Hahn Im sure CA3LE appreciate it, i need a spell check too for the forum, but aslong as ppl understand me i dont really care VanBuren

Yea probl, with smaller RWIN it will take more time to get full speed, but overall its better to have a smaller (not tooooo small) RWIN and get stable results and faster browsing. VanBuren

almost all filehare speedmeters is very inaccurate, you also use several TCP streams and can never be compared to a single stream. to find a more accurate speed, you need to use taskmanager

some ISP block this feature and ping, it can also happen if you got real bad packetloss, but if you have no problem with speed its probl blocked. VanBuren

hey justin follow the guide like you did with win 98, just choose the xp 2000 folder instead http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewtopic.php?t=605 VanBuren

Alot better, what speed do you get now? Also try my tweakguide http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewtopic.php?t=605 good luck VanBuren

hey Bad and welcome to the forum All satelite connections i seen has a crappy upload, dont know how to tweak those connections but try the DW thread http://www.testmy.net/forumz/viewforum.php?f=21 maybe you find some good info there VanBuren

unplug power to your modem, wait 30 seconds, plug power in again. good luck VanBuren

Power cycle that modem, leave it off for 30 seconds and make a new tracert against testmy.net and post result again VanBuren

hey poo and welcome to the forum thats around average speed here, what is your advertised speed? VanBuren