bryanlautt

Not my best but it will work! Also behind router!

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 10172 Kbps about 10.2 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1242 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/25 - 8:20pm

Bottom Line:: 177X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.82 sec

Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 39.172 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 84.88 % faster than the average for host (insightbb.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WIYQX8PS1

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7

This is my wirelss connection through my router

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 14895 Kbps about 14.9 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1818 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/26 - 4:19am

Bottom Line:: 260X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.56 sec

Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 26.75 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 163.07 % faster than the average for host (midco.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M8FPIHKTZ

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 13615 Kbps about 13.6 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1662 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/25 - 6:02am

Bottom Line:: 237X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.62 sec

Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 29.265 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 140.8 % faster than the average for host (midco.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OPBQD6ITE

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

  here ya go :::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 7381 Kbps about 7.4 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

Download Speed is:: 901 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/24 - 6:22am

Bottom Line:: 129X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.14 sec

Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 53.984 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 25.44 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9EI0JBCAL

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)   still pretty good for a 6meg connection don't ya think

Oh yeah getting over 6meg is really good most caps only let u get around 500k before the cap.

I bet there is alot more people that wished that. ALOT MORE

I just whish my upload was faster.  dont know why but seems like there so slow around here for boosting up the upload, right now my upload is capped at 768

Thats unsatisfactory with me. but then i can remember getting DSL a few years a ago and going from dialup to 768 was like WOW lol and then to 1500, and then to 3 meg and then to 5 meg and then to 8 Meg, but the upload was like really slow for raising the cap, it was like 128, then 256, then 512, and now 768 and some places around here 1meg.

figured tommie would have known that since since he is on Sat,  only he whishes that the Sat companies could really go that fast lol.

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 34648 Kbps about 34.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 4229 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/22 - 5:19am

Bottom Line:: 604X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.24 sec

Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 2.875 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 489.15 % faster than the average for host (Comcast.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-P109LKJIV

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)

HAHA this is on a 6Meg line. my ISP had some probs earlier in the week guess they really fixed it this time

That is boost, it will slow down after about 20 meg, you should do the 48 meg test and see what the results are.

I have Fios now too   Advertised is 20/5

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 20749 Kbps about 20.7 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

Download Speed is:: 2533 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/21 - 1:06pm

Bottom Line:: 362X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.4 sec

Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 19.203 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 255.29 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WZ7MFSPTK

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7

It seemed that you were running faster with cable, if i recall right you were getting around 30mb, so why did you switch??

You got some great speeds, but there are a few on here like VanBuren could easly kill you in a long shot

If i recall right, VanBuren doesnt have that package anymore, i think he stated he had to go with something slower because he relocated.

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 13323 Kbps about 13.3 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1626 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/21 - 4:57am

Bottom Line:: 232X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.63 sec

Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 29.906 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 136.01 % faster than the average for host (midco.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4OJ1H9G5Y

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

I see, my home town has moved ahead of most big cities with the fiber.

By the way I grew up right next to Longfellow Elementary, and live in Neb now.

I was kind of sad when I was in town a few years ago and saw that they removed all the houses on the same block as the school, I used to live right next door on the west side.

edit: spelling

Wow never would have thought i would meet a person in this forum that grew up in Mitchell, SD,  I myself have lived here for about three years now, next to the Mitchell, Tech and the High School.  yeah alot of the small towns have all fiber now.  I know ITC the one that my parents are with up by Webster, that company tore up all the old lines and put in fiber.  he has a gateway that controls his cable, phone, his DSL., there they have Fiber to the Curb.

Glad your levels are looking better.

Who's running FTTH up there in the Dakotas? (I am assuming this because you are with MidContinent)

The fiber was ran just in town here my a local company called http://www.mitchelltelecom.com/

Its a Santel company but they just focused the fiber just in this town.

Everything looks pretty good to me....

The 33dB on the upstream transmit power is on the low side, but it depends upon how your home is fed by the cable plant outside.

If you are at the end of a feeder run, fed by a 4/2 tap for example, then that 33dB TX would be around normal, again depending on how many splits there are in your home.

Yeah Moved my cable modem and router to the living room so now at least my wireless is centralized and also now my cable line is online split once 3 ways, one to my dvr and the other to my bedroom and then one short line running to my cable, also helped out my singles alot.  pretty bad that a person as to do the work because the cable techs are to lazy to actually do there job right. the first time.

Specs are below of my Ambit cable modem.

Cable Modem Downstream

Downstream Lock :  Locked

Downstream Channel Id :  0

Downstream Frequency : 

Downstream Modulation :  QAM256

Downstream Symbol Rate :  5360537

Downstream Interleave Depth :  32

Downstream Receive Power Level :  -3.0 dBmV

Downstream SNR :  36.6 dB

Cable Modem Upstream

Upstream Lock :  Locked

Upstream Channel ID :  4

Upstream Frequency : 

Upstream Modulation :  QAM16

Upstream Symbol Rate :  2560 Ksym/sec

Upstream transmit Power Level :  45.8 dBmV

Upstream Mini-Slot Size :  2

Cable Modem Operation Configuration

Network Access :  Allowed

Maximum Downstream Data Rate :  0

Maximum Upstream Data Rate :  768000

Maximum Upstream Channel Burst :  3044

Maximum Number of CPEs :  7

Modem Capability :  Concatenation Enabled, Fragametation Enabled, PHS Disabled

Of course i also upgraded back to the top package which is unregulated down and 768k up.  at least thats there way of configruing the modem with a 0  for the unregulated speed for the down stream. but then i am limited to the speed of my cable modem and other networking factures.  my wireless i run around 20mb and my wired computers run around 22mb.  those speeds are at night, during the day around 13 to 15mb. 

Cant wait untill they implement 3.0 on there network instead of the 2.0, i do have an option for DSL and Fiber in town here but there to slow. Qwest DSL is one and the fiber is a small company in town and they are capped at 10MB down and 512k up all though it would be cool of not having to worry about if your cable modem is in sync all the time since the Fiber runs right up to your place and then a cat 5 cable is run into your house right to your computer or router then computer and the TV is acutally 100 percent digital even the lower stations.

yeah im going to buy some coax cable, some of that RG6 quad sheild, and run it from the splitter comming in the apt and straight to the computer room, because they have it all daisy chained so basically my line going to the modem is spliced and split, ok so right now i have a dual splitter one for the tv and the other line going to the modem, and then that modem  line is spliced again. and runs into the bedroom and then into the computer room.  well i think i can just put the 3 way that the tech guy gave me and run a cable straight into the computer room.  Or i could just bring the router and cable modem out to the living room and just buy a cat 5e cable or 6 and run it to the computer.  I think that would be the other option, at least then the wireless router will be in a centralized location then.

turn 32 in July

VanBuren

I also turned 32 in July

Just curious if these settings are optimal, seems like the techs are giving me the run around but i think my upload power level is to low? maybe or maybe not, let me know what you think.  details are below.

Cable Modem Upstream

Upstream Lock :  Locked

Upstream Channel ID :  4

Upstream Frequency : 

Upstream Modulation :  QAM16

Upstream Symbol Rate :  2560 Ksym/sec

Upstream transmit Power Level :  33.0 dBmV

Upstream Mini-Slot Size :  2

Cable Modem Downstream

Downstream Lock :  Locked

Downstream Channel Id :  0

Downstream Frequency : 

Downstream Modulation :  QAM256

Downstream Symbol Rate :  5360537

Downstream Interleave Depth :  32

Downstream Receive Power Level :  -1.9 dBmV

Downstream SNR :  36.6 dB

Cable Modem Upstream Burst

Req

Init Maint

Per Maint

Short Data

Long Data

(1)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Modulation Type QPSK  QPSK  16QAM  16QAM  16QAM 

Differential Encoding Off  Off  Off  Off  Off 

Preamble Length 32 64 128 128 128

Preamble Value Offset 0 64 640 640 640

FEC Error Correction (T) 0 5 5 4 9

FEC Codeword Information Bytes (k) 16 34 34 76 232

Scrambler Seed 338 338 338 338 338

Maximum Burst Size 0 0 0 7 137

Guard Time Size 22 48 48 22 22

Last Codeword Length Fixed  Fixed  Fixed  Short  Short 

Scrambler on/off On  On  On  On  On

Cable Modem Operation Configuration

Network Access :  Allowed

Maximum Downstream Data Rate :  10000000

Maximum Upstream Data Rate :  512000

Maximum Upstream Channel Burst :  3044

Maximum Number of CPEs :  7

Modem Capability :  Concatenation Enabled, Fragametation Enabled, PHS Disabled

Tommie? Did you grease your modem? WOW!!!

No, thats probably and buisness connection lol

not a dish lol, although he probably whishes lol

Yeah i never had to tweak Vista

Geeze, all the tweaking I have done w/ XP, and I get roughly the same score w/ Ubuntu, nothing done to registry at all! 

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 5520 Kbps about 5.5 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 674 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/08/16 - 4:09pm

Bottom Line:: 96X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.52 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 8.88 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 14.45 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VJN4KMD8E

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.6(Ubuntu-feisty)

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 6391 Kbps about 6.4 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 780 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/08/16 - 4:13pm

Bottom Line:: 111X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.31 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 7.669 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 32.51 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I7HBNSL96

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.6 (Ubuntu-feisty)

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 6412 Kbps about 6.4 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Download Speed is:: 783 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/08/16 - 4:14pm

Bottom Line:: 112X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.31 sec

Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 7.644 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 32.95 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K7JQUD0VA

User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.6 (Ubuntu-feisty)

My kids in there on the PS2 online ( variance)

Got to love the upload lol

Whish i had at least half of that upload

and if you think thats ::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::

Download Connection is:: 25914 Kbps about 25.91 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)

Download Speed is:: 3163 kB/s

Upload Connection is:: 17049 Kbps about 17 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)

Upload Speed is:: 2081 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/08 - 10:40am

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QEUZHCM97

U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VX9GCJSM2

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

cached...

Nice upload, to bad that wasnt from your home connection lol

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Download Connection is:: 8982 Kbps about 9 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)

Download Speed is:: 1096 kB/s

Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)

Test Time:: 2007/09/07 - 11:19pm

Bottom Line:: 157X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.93 sec

Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 44.362 seconds to complete

Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 61.26 % faster than the average for host (midco.net)

D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GPUB07ORM

User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

Not bad for a 10Meg cap

I just down graded to the lower package of 10mb/512k

wow i remember when 3 meg was a fast package to have lol

they got us good then. around my town i have to pay 39.95 for 3Mbps. no joke. and only other providers are dialup or wireless....and of course att but icant get that.

You totally missed the point lol

procesor doesnt affect your download speed.

heres an example an old pc with a isp provider and has a 8Mbps adverstisement speed

and a dual core procesor with a dial up connection.

that should give you an idea

i pay 49.95 for a 20MB package

I pay about $60 a month for the 5 mb package.

lol and to think i was going to downgrade to the 10MB package and save 15 a month, wow a 100 bucks extra just for 5mb connection thats a rip off.  I have Midcontinent here in South Dakota.