Marcin541 Posted December 12, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 12, 2004 Actually, now that i look at it, more nodes have had packet loss. For the trace to testmy.net the nodes who have "theplanet" in them have around a 90% packet loss! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 12, 2004 CID Share Posted December 12, 2004 some theplanet nodes block ping after a while, so you cant flood em and that show up as packetloss. here is my trace against testmy.net VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted December 12, 2004 CID Share Posted December 12, 2004 Actually' date=' now that i look at it, more nodes have had packet loss. For the trace to testmy.net the nodes who have "theplanet" in them have around a 90% packet loss![/quote'] Yep your correct there have been times when I have had such packet loss when "the planet" nodes were causing problems for me. If there is a problem on that end it will alarm someone and it will be addressed.....but great job searching for where the problem may be 4u..........dont give up and please let us know the outcome.......... Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted December 12, 2004 CID Share Posted December 12, 2004 marcin, that ping to your node is too high lol... btw your pinging with 999 bytes... that will raise your ping slightly...very....slightly.. but dont use the -l when trying to get accuracy. heres the pinging to my node Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and Settings.s1>ping -t 10.102.192.1 Pinging 10.102.192.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.102.192.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 I been having problems with my connection look. 5mb/768kb package :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 468 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Upload Speed is: 57 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 8 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 17.96 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=0BHHG564I :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 843 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 748 KB) Download Speed is:: 103 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 15 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 9.94 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=STMB53KXP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 13, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 I dont think Verizon offers 5/768 so you dont have it Ill do as VanBuren said, connect directly to phone jack, but im too lazy and tired right now lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 I have Cox Cable. The 5/768 package from cox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 13, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 Ah, misunderstood, thought you said you had Verizon 5/768. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 Well, if Verizon DSL was available in Phoenix, Arizona i would probably have that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 Well' date=' if Verizon DSL was available in Phoenix, Arizona i would probably have that.[/quote'] Interesting you would take Verizon DSL over COX.? What would be the reason if you dont mind me asking? Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 i would as well. But only if the verizion package was fios Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 I dont like sharing my connection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 Look at my connection it has dropped . :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1024 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is:: 125 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 18 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 8.19 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=84MK1S5XW :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 571 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Upload Speed is: 70 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 10 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 14.63 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=GALLGKUN2 This is from the 5/768 package im going to have to call cox so they can send me a tech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted December 13, 2004 CID Share Posted December 13, 2004 some theplanet nodes block ping after a while, so you cant flood em and that show up as packetloss. here is my trace against testmy.net VanBuren lol same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 15, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 15, 2004 Van, i did as you told me. The wire is directly connected to the main jack, all phones unplugged. It hasnt fixed anything though Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsMarcin B.HOMEPC>tracert yahoo.com Tracing route to yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms dslrouter [192.168.1.1] 2 32 ms 34 ms 35 ms 10.32.107.1 3 23 ms 23 ms 32 ms at-3-0-0-1727.CORE-RTR2.NY325.verizon-gni.net [1 30.81.11.53] 4 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms so-0-0-0-0.CORE-RTR1.NY325.verizon-gni.net [130. 81.7.181] 5 41 ms 42 ms 42 ms so-4-0-0-0.BB-RTR1.NY325.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .8.25] 6 56 ms 57 ms 56 ms so-5-0-0-0.BB-RTR1.RES.verizon-gni.net [130.81.8 .253] 7 34 ms 35 ms 36 ms so-6-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.ASH.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .10.90] 8 31 ms 31 ms 30 ms 130.81.15.50 9 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms vlan220-msr2.dcn.yahoo.com [216.115.96.165] 10 43 ms 44 ms 46 ms vl47.bas1-m.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.120.218] 11 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms w2.rc.vip.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsMarcin B.HOMEPC>tracert yahoo.com Tracing route to yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms dslrouter [192.168.1.1] 2 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms 10.32.107.1 3 30 ms 23 ms 24 ms at-3-0-0-1727.CORE-RTR2.NY325.verizon-gni.net [1 30.81.11.53] 4 30 ms 32 ms 33 ms so-0-0-0-0.CORE-RTR1.NY325.verizon-gni.net [130. 81.7.181] 5 35 ms 25 ms 26 ms so-4-0-0-0.BB-RTR1.NY325.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .8.25] 6 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms so-5-0-0-0.BB-RTR1.RES.verizon-gni.net [130.81.8 .253] 7 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms so-6-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.ASH.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .10.90] 8 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms 130.81.15.50 9 45 ms 47 ms 48 ms vlan220-msr2.dcn.yahoo.com [216.115.96.165] 10 40 ms 36 ms 38 ms vl49.bas1-m.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.120.222] 11 32 ms 32 ms 31 ms w2.rc.vip.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsMarcin B.HOMEPC> Speeds are still up and down like crazy. What should i do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 15, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 15, 2004 Pinging the first node... Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsMarcin B.HOMEPC>ping -t 10.32.107.1 Pinging 10.32.107.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 15, 2004 CID Share Posted December 15, 2004 Pinging the first node... Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsMarcin B.HOMEPC>ping -t 10.32.107.1 Pinging 10.32.107.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=254 call your ISP and let them check your signals when you have crappy speed VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 15, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 15, 2004 All that they will say is to restart my modem lol And after an hour of me explaining they will tell me I need a technician to come and check my lines... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 15, 2004 CID Share Posted December 15, 2004 All that they will say is to restart my modem lol And after an hour of me explaining they will tell me I need a technician to come and check my lines... Well i think its the only way to go right now VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 15, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 15, 2004 Alright, ill call them and see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 15, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 15, 2004 My god i hate this... It isnt my damn fault. Van, is that first hop being so high in ping really my fault? Couldn't it be my ISP's. It freaking times out... how is that possible? Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsMarcin B.HOMEPC>tracert yahoo.com Tracing route to yahoo.com [66.94.234.13] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 57 ms 56 ms * 10.32.107.1 2 26 ms 26 ms 27 ms at-3-0-0-1727.CORE-RTR2.NY325.verizon-gni.net [1 30.81.11.53] 3 29 ms 29 ms 27 ms so-4-0-0-0.BB-RTR2.NY325.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .8.29] 4 39 ms 40 ms 43 ms so-7-0-0-0.BB-RTR1.NY325.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .8.9] 5 36 ms 41 ms 43 ms so-5-0-0-0.BB-RTR1.RES.verizon-gni.net [130.81.8 .253] 6 50 ms 51 ms 49 ms so-6-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.ASH.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .10.90] 7 60 ms 59 ms 51 ms 130.81.15.50 8 116 ms 126 ms 129 ms ge-1-0-4.p560.pat1.pao.yahoo.com [216.115.97.0] 9 117 ms 132 ms * vl34.bas1-m.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.82.193] 10 122 ms 137 ms 173 ms vl42.bas1-m.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.82.226] 11 134 ms 140 ms 127 ms w2.rc.vip.scd.yahoo.com [66.94.234.13] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsMarcin B.HOMEPC>ping -t 10.32.107.1 Pinging 10.32.107.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=254 Request timed out. Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=254 Reply from 10.32.107.1: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 16, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 16, 2004 Also, support doesnt wanna do shit about it. I talk to another member each day... Yesterday after spending 30 minutes of explaining that i did everything... the damn tech support asks "Ok, please restart your modem and computer". Im like, WTF?! So i just went to sleep with the ticket open. Today I was talking to one support member, who seemed like a resonable person. She asked for me to allow her to run a tracert to a site. But my modem wouldnt let her connect, or atleast she said it like that. 5 minutes later she said she gad to go and another person came on. The person asked "Have you removed the splitter" I said "I connected it directly to my main phone jack" she said "Have you removed the splitter". Well if I was so stupid to use a splitter to connect it to my main phone jack.. i would have worked at Verizon lol. Sorry, im just outraged right now. Edit : recent speed test... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 190 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Download Speed is:: 23 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 3 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 44.52 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=3CX8SCMJM It is slower by the day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 16, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 16, 2004 My only other guess is that my phone cord outside of my house if broken. Im pretty sure it isnt me. I had 768/128 dsl and it ran very, very smoothly. Before i got my upgrade, it was ok. So unless the wire outside my house broke the same day I got my new dsl, there is no other explenation. I mean if I was able to work good at 768/128 even with a broken phone line, how come i cant even hit that now. Heck, I was able to work at 1.5/384 without problems. This is a tracert with "perfect" dsl conditions. Its connected directly to my main phone jack leading outside of the house, and the power adapter is isolated from all other adapters/plugs. The modem is also isolated, so overheating is not the issue here. I read a post a few days back where it said that verizon puts you on a high ping server, is this what they meant? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 16, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 16, 2004 I posted on BBR and other people seem to be having problems with that aswell. If i say its not my phone line, its not my phone line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcin541 Posted December 16, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 16, 2004 Further research shows a rogue router(s) and in fact, one of those show up on my trace route as hop #3. Glad i found that out, now its time to call verizon and complain, complain, complain. Damn them and bothering my phone lines lol... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.