scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 ive saved the tcp optimizer to my desktop butnot run it yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Use the TCP Optimzer and load the following, twice. Reboot after each loading: General Settings tab: Custom settings - check Modify All Network Adapters - check network adapter selection - your NIC MTU - leave blank TTL - 64 TCP Receive Window - 64240 MTU Discovery - Yes Black Hole Detect - No Selective Acks - Yes Max Duplicate ACKs - 2 TCP 1323 Options: Windows Scaling - uncheck Timestamps - uncheck Advanced Settings tab: Max Connections per Server - 10 Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20 LocalPriority - 5 Host Priority - 6 DNSPriority - 7 NetbtPriority - 8 Lan Browsing speedup - optimized QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0 ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0 ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 240 MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0 NetFailureCacheTime - 0 NegativeSOACache Time - 0 LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768 Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 ok mate done that, what next? want me to test speed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 After reboot the 2nd time, test at https://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Your IP () appears to be behind a web proxy server () and results shown might not be for your system. TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65535 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65535 Note: TCP 1323 Options need to be enabled for RWIN over 2^16 (65535). Windows 9x might also need the MS Vtcp386 fix. For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 64240 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2621.4 kbps (327.675 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1048.56 kbps (131.07 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 59 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 CP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 290.84Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 404.76kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: The receive buffer should be 144.16 Kbytes to maximize throughput click START to re-test Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 290.84Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 469.79kb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem Information: The receive buffer should be 196.59 Kbytes to maximize throughput click START to re-test Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 290.84Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 469.79kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_04 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 536.84 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 6 packets retransmitted, 49 duplicate acks received, and 59 SACK blocks received The connection was idle 0 seconds (0%) of the time This connection is receiver limited 14.89% of the time. Increasing the the client's receive buffer (63.0 KB) will improve performance This connection is network limited 85.08% of the time. Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Client IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Load and run TCP Optimizer again but one time only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 244 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 8760 CongAvoid: 111 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 1 CountRTT: 190 CurCwnd: 39420 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 880 CurRwinRcvd: 65535 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 32120 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 645320 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 442 DupAcksIn: 49 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 1 MaxCwnd: 65700 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 1460 MaxRTT: 940 MaxRwinRcvd: 65535 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 32120 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 550 MinRTT: 190 MinRwinRcvd: 65535 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 244 PktsOut: 442 PktsRetrans: 6 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 59 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 59 SampleRTT: 620 SmoothedRTT: 620 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 1547527 SndLimTimeCwnd: 8839313 SndLimTimeSender: 2588 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 2 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 39420 SndLimBytesCwnd: 605900 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 102000 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 91116 Duration: 10392246 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 2 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 0.44 loss: 0.002262443 avgrtt: 536.84 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.2008 rwintime: 0.1490 sendtime: 0.0002 cwndtime: 0.8508 rwin: 0.5000 swin: 0.7891 cwin: 0.5013 rttsec: 0.536842 Sndbuf: 103424 aspd: 2.21475 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.29<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.14>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [2.26>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.85>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [32120>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.29<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [2.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [0.44>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.14>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/2=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [2.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.14>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.85>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [32120>0] estimate = 0.44 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 536.84msec, and loss = 0.002262443 The theoretical network limit is 0.44 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1.46 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 0.93 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 0.93 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'T1' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 same settings as you gave me before for optimizer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Test again with just TCP Analyzer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Here are some tests hosted nearer to you that I'd like you to try: Sweden 1MB Sweden 5MB Germany 1MB Germany 5MB Try testing with your firewall on, and then with it off. This way you can see if/how much it is interfering with the test results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 TCP options string = 020405b401010402 MTU = 1500 MTU is fully optimized for broadband. MSS = 1460 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 64240 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2569.6 kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1027.84 kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 59 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Good idea. Latency will be lower to these sites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 364 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1075 kB) Download Speed is:: 44 kB/s Tested From:: http://visioncorp.plexecutor.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB download in 23.27 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 30.61 % of your hosts average (ntli.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0934MPHUR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 same site without firewall on at all :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 437 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1075 kB) Download Speed is:: 53 kB/s Tested From:: http://visioncorp.plexecutor.com Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB download in 19.32 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 36.82 % of your hosts average (ntli.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CXJ0DAQS4 is anything getting any better?shall i try the sweeden ones too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 with firewall, from sweeden, il be back in half hour please post what i should do now, many thanks guys :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 351 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1075 kB) Download Speed is:: 43 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB download in 23.81 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 29.65 % of your hosts average (ntli.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XLMD3Y6UP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 His TCP buffer seems to be 'sticky'. Even when RWIN is changed from 64240 to 128480, his throughput limit only increase 10-15% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 is there anything else i can do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 I think it may be a software conflict on your PC. Let's try booting into safe mode with networking, this will eliminate your startup items. Restart your PC and tap F8. When you see Windows Advance Options menu, you should be able to select safe mode with networking. Try running a speedtest. To get back to normal mode, just restart. If you can't get into safe mode with networking this way, there is another way. Question: which browser are you using? Have you tried testing a different one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 What brand and model no. is your modem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 im connected to 1meg braodband, with tesco braodband, i use internet explorer to connect to the internet, i will try restarted in safe mode and doing a speed test mate, back in a minute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scumbucketsex Posted February 6, 2006 Author CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 modem says thomson speedtouch330 on it on it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 Go to this site and check if you had install the correct driver for your modem: XP 64bit or Driver upgrade for XP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted February 6, 2006 CID Share Posted February 6, 2006 have you also upgraded your driver? or had just installed the driver in the CD that came with your modem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.