etiolate Posted March 14, 2006 CID Share Posted March 14, 2006 Is anyone receiving consistent speeds? I've only had it for a little over a week, but i've yet to see 15/2. Im usually around 11/1.2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted March 15, 2006 CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 Etiolate, have you read through our sticky? http://www.testmy.net/forum/t-2097 If you post some more information, we may be able to help you. Start with some feedback from the sticky, along with speedtest results and a traceroute if possible. Also, with your connection, remember to test with a LARGER FILE SIZE. Try testing from some of the MIRRORS, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 15, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 verizon fios 15/2 windows 2000 pro trend micro pc-cillin internet security i always test with the large file i also just noticed today that i cant get my xbox 360 to hook up to the network now. it uses a wireless adapter, and always connected fine. now it seems to be having a problem, and i keep receiving error about changing my network to 80211a because of interference. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 13255 Kbps about 13.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1618 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/14 - 11:15pm Bottom Line:: 237X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.63 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 7.515 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 165.47 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-AZT3ULQEM :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1203 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 147 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/14 - 11:17pm Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 6.97 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 10.18464 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 81.45 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8FDNTP2CR running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.87Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 13.88Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 1.87Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 12.75Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet The current date is: Wed 03/15/2006 The current time is: 1:27:12.14 Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 53ms, Average = 52ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * * * Request timed out. 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 * * * Request timed out. 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 233 ms 52 ms 52 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405ac010303030101080a000000000000000001010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 307824 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6) Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 38478 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 12312.96 Kbps (1539.12 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 4925.184 Kbps (615.648 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 59 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = ON Note: Timestamps add 12 bytes to the TCP header of each packet, reducing the space available for useful data. Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) im currently using some settings that van buren gave me, but im still not seeing an increase in speed. any help would be appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted March 15, 2006 CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 How long have you had the settings on? It sometimes takes a couple of days to settle in(last cable-nut settings). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 15, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 only a few days. 2 or 3 maybe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted March 15, 2006 CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 I would think that would be good. It was just a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted March 15, 2006 CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 Try the Verizon_Fios_DHCP_15000_2000.ccs from VanBuren's v.7 batch. It will increase your MSS to 1460 and your RWIN to 512000, and also your DefaultSendWindow to 128000, which should help your upload. Remember to click "Save to Registry" and reboot your PC, then run those tests again. Question: is your PC connecting wirelessly as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 15, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 i tried that css before, and my speed went down to to about 5mbs on the downloads. i am not connected wirelessly this is after the Verizon_Fios_DHCP_15000_2000.ccs :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9336 Kbps about 9.3 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 1140 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 8:02am Bottom Line:: 167X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.9 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.25 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 87.02 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HNLB0QGAI :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1550 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 189 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 7:07am Bottom Line:: 28X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 5.42 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 15.81024 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 133.79 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GZ6TXU9N0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted March 15, 2006 CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 Try changing DefaultReceiveWindow to 384000, save, reboot, and perform the following tests: https://www.speedguide.net:8080/ http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?ni=1&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=mirror-Blunted2&out_src=16 http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?ni=1&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=mirror-Elite.Pete&out_src=20MB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 15, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 15, 2006 i didnt try that yet. but, why are my speeds flucuating so much. is that normal? i tested it 5 times got 15mbps everytime on my download now im getting 5mbps Browser/OS = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address. TCP options string = 020405ac0103030401010402 MTU = 1492 MTU is optimized for PPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput. MSS = 1452 MSS is optimized for PPPoE DSL broadband. If not, consider raising your MTU value. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 1022208 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 4 bits (scale factor of Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 63888 RWIN is a multiple of MSS Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4) 127776 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 63888 (MSS x 44) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 40888.32 kbps (5111.04 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 16355.328 kbps (2044.416 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 59 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 930 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 114 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 2:44pm Bottom Line:: 17X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.98 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 13.16928 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 40.27 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BEJO6ASMV running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 922.58Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 14.31Mb/s :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4928 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 16384 kB) Download Speed is:: 602 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.speakeasy.org Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 3:17pm Bottom Line:: 88X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.7 sec Tested from a 16384 kB file and took 27.234 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 98.68 % of your hosts average (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2O1ESFCGN :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1042 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 127 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 3:21pm Bottom Line:: 19X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.06 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 11.76 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.16 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-962EZOCLT :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6521 Kbps about 6.5 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 796 kB/s Tested From:: http://demonlegion.net Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 3:21pm Bottom Line:: 116X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.29 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 26.344 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 30.58 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8Z5RMUAI4 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1025 Kbps about 1 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 125 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/15 - 3:22pm Bottom Line:: 18X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.19 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 11.95488 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 54.6 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IHE7OK38V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted March 16, 2006 CID Share Posted March 16, 2006 The SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer does not reflect the same .ccs file I tried. RWIN is way too high, MTU is 1492...i'll upload the file for you when I gets hoooooome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted March 16, 2006 CID Share Posted March 16, 2006 Try this file. Also, allow ICMP traffic through your router, and perform another tracert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 16, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 16, 2006 is that that one from van burens set? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 16, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 16, 2006 this is after i applied that file :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 9564 Kbps about 9.6 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 1167 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/16 - 4:32pm Bottom Line:: 171X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.88 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 5.125 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 91.51 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WQ9H6I4ZY :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1674 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 204 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/16 - 4:34pm Bottom Line:: 30X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 5.02 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.64 seconds to complete Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 152.11 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4J6WZ20KA The current date is: Thu 03/16/2006 The current time is: 18:39:42.89 Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 53ms, Average = 52ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * * * Request timed out. 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 * * * Request timed out. 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 51 ms 52 ms 52 ms 85.67-18-179.reverse.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. despite those speeds just browsing the internet seems very slow now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted March 16, 2006 CID Share Posted March 16, 2006 All I can say is WOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 17, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 17, 2006 wow? im supposed to be getting 15 down, and im getting 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted March 17, 2006 CID Share Posted March 17, 2006 why is all your trace routes blocked? you sure your not doing that and not even know it? my firewall can do that if i set it up to so are you using a firewall? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 18, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 18, 2006 why is all your trace routes blocked? you sure your not doing that and not even know it? my firewall can do that if i set it up to so are you using a firewall? im using the firewall built into trend micros internet security, and i have peer guardian on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted March 18, 2006 CID Share Posted March 18, 2006 wow? im supposed to be getting 15 down, and im getting 9 Boot file maybe? Have you gotten to third tier ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etiolate Posted March 18, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 18, 2006 Boot file maybe? Have you gotten to third tier ? im confused whats the boot file? and what do you mean third tier? i get 15mbps sometimes but not consistently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted March 18, 2006 CID Share Posted March 18, 2006 I am no expert on the subject by any means, but to my knowledge , when you agree to a certain package , they set your bandwidth in what they call a boot file, which limits speed. Correct me if im wrong . What I meant by third tier is the techs @ your isp that acually Know there sh*t. If you get this sometimes , not always I would say, not being an expert, once again, network traffic, or uncapping on your node.Oh yeh dont forget possible laser misfire on the head end , just to name a few possibilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.