Swimmer Posted May 8, 2006 CID Share Posted May 8, 2006 I am trying to see if a problem I am having is just me.. I am having issues with packet loss on Comcast routers 68.87.230.29 68.87.230.25 68.87.230.21 If you live in the chicago land area and are having problems.. please let me know.. Thanks, Swimmer.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted May 8, 2006 CID Share Posted May 8, 2006 I am not in the area (where's Pitbull??), but ICMP traffic looks good to these IP's: <hr> 15 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms 12.116.16.10 16 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms 68.87.230.253 17 26 ms 27 ms 26 ms 68.87.231.58 18 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms 68.87.230.42 19 60 ms 28 ms 45 ms 68.87.230.37 20 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms 68.87.230.33 21 31 ms 33 ms 30 ms 68.87.230.29 <hr> Ping statistics for 68.87.230.29: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 31ms <hr> Ping statistics for 68.87.230.25: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 29ms <hr> Ping statistics for 68.87.230.21: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 94ms, Average = 31ms <hr> Swimmer, maybe it's your route. Did you wanna post a traceroute? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted May 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted May 8, 2006 1 21 ms 18 ms 25 ms 192.168.0.1 2 * 10 ms 19 ms 73.48.6.1 3 26 ms 9 ms 9 ms ge-1-25-ur01.nchicago.il.chicago.comcast.net [68 .86.118.137] 4 25 ms 11 ms 11 ms 68.87.230.33 5 26 ms 9 ms * 68.87.230.29 6 10 ms * * 68.87.230.25 7 14 ms 11 ms * 68.87.230.21 8 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 68.87.230.17 9 14 ms 18 ms 13 ms 68.87.231.89 10 * 27 ms 13 ms 68.87.231.250 11 28 ms 13 ms 13 ms 12.125.194.9 12 59 ms 37 ms 36 ms tbr2-p012001.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.4.230] 13 49 ms 39 ms 45 ms tbr2-cl7.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.46] 14 * 36 ms 37 ms tbr1-cl24.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.9.141] 15 35 ms 40 ms * tbr2-cl6.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90] 16 53 ms 63 ms 56 ms gr1-p340.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.173] 17 48 ms 45 ms 53 ms 12.119.136.14 18 77 ms 73 ms 73 ms vl32.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.61] 19 50 ms 33 ms 34 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 20 50 ms 34 ms 33 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8 5] 21 50 ms 33 ms 33 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zephyrus Posted May 9, 2006 CID Share Posted May 9, 2006 I've actually been having a few problems connecting to TW Teleglobe, & Qwest networks, Not sure what those ISP's you posted are as I am at work & I don't have the time to trace them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitbull481 Posted May 18, 2006 CID Share Posted May 18, 2006 sorry for late respond Pinging 68.87.230.29... Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 25ms TTL: 240ms Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 26ms TTL: 240ms Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 25ms TTL: 240ms Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 26ms TTL: 240ms Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 26ms TTL: 240ms Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 25ms TTL: 240ms Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 25ms TTL: 240ms Reply from: 68.87.230.29 RTT: 26ms TTL: 240ms Pinging 68.87.230.25... Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 28ms TTL: 241ms Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 27ms TTL: 241ms Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 28ms TTL: 241ms Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 28ms TTL: 241ms Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 27ms TTL: 241ms Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 28ms TTL: 241ms Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 28ms TTL: 241ms Reply from: 68.87.230.25 RTT: 28ms TTL: 241ms Pinging 68.87.230.21... Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 27ms TTL: 242ms Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 27ms TTL: 242ms Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 27ms TTL: 242ms Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 28ms TTL: 242ms Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 27ms TTL: 242ms Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 27ms TTL: 242ms Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 27ms TTL: 242ms Reply from: 68.87.230.21 RTT: 32ms TTL: 242ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted May 28, 2006 CID Share Posted May 28, 2006 eh.. thats why i dont like comcast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cashmo Posted June 13, 2006 CID Share Posted June 13, 2006 I live and chicago with comcast and my internet has been greatly faster here :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 11276 Kbps about 11.28 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 1376 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2)Test Time:: 2006/06/13 - 11:43am Bottom Line:: 197X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.74 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 4.347 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 137.14 % faster than the average for host (comcast.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-005MOV3XK User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!] my download speed has increased a lot but my upload is the same and am on a router Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asubaseball727 Posted June 13, 2006 CID Share Posted June 13, 2006 I think that's the powerboost and that's great news its coming to chicago . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted July 28, 2006 CID Share Posted July 28, 2006 i just noticed something... try a bigger test than 5 mb.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swimmer Posted July 28, 2006 Author CID Share Posted July 28, 2006 that might not change anything.. Comcast has direct access to the backbone in chicago.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.