Blunted 2 Posted December 7, 2006 CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 my friend cant do it but it works fine for me http://www.testmy.net/ou-mirror-Blunted2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coknuck Posted December 7, 2006 CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 Works for me fine. :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 917 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 112 kB/s Tested From:: http://eebobb.com Test Time:: 2006/12/07 - 4:14pm Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 9.14 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.734 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 130.98 % faster than the average for host (insightbb.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Q0X72T1W5 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted December 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 cool thanks man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted December 7, 2006 CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 934 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 114 kB/s Tested From:: http://eebobb.com Test Time:: 2006/12/07 - 4:24pm Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.98 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.235 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 23.22 % faster than the average for host (7.37) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TKN2CVAHZ User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 4.0) [!] hi coknuck =) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted December 7, 2006 CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 it worked just fine for me :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 422 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Upload Speed is:: 52 kB/s Tested From:: http://eebobb.com Test Time:: 2006/12/07 - 4:41pm Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 19.69 sec Tested from a 748 kB file and took 14.509 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 64.84 % faster than the average for host (bellsouth.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M63CQLXRY User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] what browser is he using. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted December 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 7, 2006 it worked just fine for me :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 422 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 748 kB) Upload Speed is:: 52 kB/s Tested From:: http://eebobb.com Test Time:: 2006/12/07 - 4:41pm Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 19.69 sec Tested from a 748 kB file and took 14.509 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 64.84 % faster than the average for host (bellsouth.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-M63CQLXRY User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] what browser is he using. firefox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 Works fine for me on satelite also. Maybe if he tried in IE :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 119 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 15 kB/s Tested From:: http://eebobb.com Test Time:: 2006/12/07 - 5:57pm Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 68.27 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 40 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 20.2 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QYFS1BZ8T User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] With a 50 D/L. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 nice upload tommie -) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buntz Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 Works for me on Firefox 2.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 nice upload tommie -) Yeah, I am rocking on that one. But not as good as insight's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 pshhH! C:Documents and SettingsTim>ping testmy.net -l 128 -n 25 Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 128 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=25ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=26ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=26ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=25ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=25ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=26ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=25ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=26ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=25ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=128 time=24ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 26ms i love it.. tommie, can i see your tracert or something? whos dway backbone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 OK Tim. I have never done one. What do I do? Really. Gentle, I am virgin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 I tried to no avail. But this is what I think you want. I did it with TCP Optimizer. Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=914ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1347ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1245ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1185ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1223ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1265ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1201ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1283ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1210ms TTL=49 I did it three times in a row. If this is not what you are looking for tell me how. OK, I did notice one thing different. The packet size was different. Yours was like 128 so I changed it to match. I guess. Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 128 bytes ->bytes=128 time=2208ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 128 bytes ->bytes=128 time=2246ms TTL=49 Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 128 bytes ->bytes=128 time=1743ms TTL=49 Is that it?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 oh, found it... yeah.. not bad pings for satallite i guess? now go and type tracert testmy.net =) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimPawlak Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 OK Tim. I have never done one. What do I do? Really. Gentle, I am virgin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 oh, found it... yeah.. not bad pings for satallite i guess? now go and type tracert testmy.net =) Type it where? I am new to this, totally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted December 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 hit start then run and type cmd and when the command prompt comes up type tracert testmy.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 Ok, that worked blunted. Now how do I put it in here? It does not want to copy and paste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted December 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 right click on the window and select all and then right click on the blue part of the window and goto edit and copy it then paste it in here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsOwner>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * * * Request timed out. 2 3037 ms 1934 ms 1982 ms dpc67142135066.direcpc.com [67.142.135.66] 3 1742 ms 1682 ms 1990 ms dpc67142131158.direcpc.com [67.142.131.158] 4 1651 ms 1726 ms 2012 ms dpc67142131149.direcpc.com [67.142.131.149] 5 1727 ms 1778 ms 999 ms dpc67142131090.direcpc.com [67.142.131.90] 6 2723 ms 1966 ms 1982 ms bur-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [72.166.140.109] 7 1749 ms 1990 ms 1950 ms bur-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.13.85] 8 1658 ms 1690 ms 1746 ms lap-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.213.110] 9 1279 ms 659 ms 703 ms 205.171.1.66 10 1442 ms 1978 ms 926 ms so1-0-0-2488m.ar1.dal2.gblx.net [67.17.73.34] 11 2548 ms 1998 ms 1987 ms The-Planet.ge-0-2-1.ar1.DAL2.gblx.net [64.213.17 6.150] 12 1633 ms 1810 ms 1984 ms te9-2.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.30] 13 1693 ms 1758 ms 1978 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 14 1630 ms 1786 ms 2019 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8 5] 15 1642 ms 1747 ms 1950 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsOwner> My first time. Thanks blunted. So is it worth a crap? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunted 2 Posted December 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 ouch Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Eebobb.NeT [192.168.1.1] 2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.50.192.1 3 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.lybrny.cv.net [167.206.33.34] 4 11 ms 7 ms 7 ms r4-ge9-2.mhe.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.33.5] 5 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms 65.19.111.201 6 8 ms 9 ms 11 ms r2-srp1-0.in.nycmny83.cv.net [65.19.96.38] 7 14 ms 16 ms 14 ms 65.19.101.130 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 14 ms 15 ms 15 ms so-4-0-0.mpr2.iad2.us.above.net [64.125.30.122] 10 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms so-4-0-0.mpr1.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.28.213] 11 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms so-0-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.29.110] 12 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms so-1-0-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.28.129] 13 49 ms 49 ms 52 ms so-5-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.29.145] 14 48 ms 50 ms 49 ms 216.200.6.237.theplanet.com [216.200.6.237] 15 48 ms 48 ms 49 ms te7-1.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.2] 16 48 ms 49 ms 48 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 17 50 ms 47 ms 47 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8 5] 18 49 ms 47 ms 47 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 Some reason mine does not look like yours. Probably why they say never game on a satelite. Well I hope Tim got what he was looking for then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendrik Schipper Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 Hi there, can I joine you? tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.123.254 2 53 ms 52 ms 57 ms 192.168.78.1 3 61 ms 52 ms 52 ms 192.168.254.2 4 87 ms 57 ms 74 ms ra1so-ge3-2-88.cg.bigpipeinc.com [64.141.118.14 5 78 ms 47 ms 49 ms rc1so-ge9-8.cg.shawcable.net [66.163.71.49] 6 101 ms 99 ms 97 ms rc1wh-pos12-0.vc.shawcable.net [66.163.76.10] 7 65 ms 69 ms 94 ms rc2wt-pos7-0.wa.shawcable.net [66.163.76.154] 8 98 ms 94 ms 84 ms rx0wt-abovenet.wa.shawcable.net [66.163.68.22] 9 88 ms 84 ms 82 ms so-6-3-0.mpr4.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.28.21] 10 121 ms 114 ms 127 ms so-2-3-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.29.50] 11 116 ms 127 ms 136 ms 64.124.79.77.theplanet.com [64.124.79.77] 12 * * 157 ms te7-1.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.2] 13 136 ms 124 ms 172 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 14 186 ms 139 ms 144 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116. ] 15 128 ms 139 ms 144 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 Well since I have the biggest numbers, DO I win?? Something tells me maybe not. And sure you may join us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted December 8, 2006 CID Share Posted December 8, 2006 should be a bit quicker for my university :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 549 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 67 kB/s Tested From:: http://eebobb.com Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 3:43am Bottom Line:: 10X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 15.28 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 44.621 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 25.34 % faster than the average for host (64.111) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-6QH9VEW48'>https://testmy.net/stats/id-6QH9VEW48 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.3) Gecko/20060426 Firefox/1.5.0.3 [!] mirror in amsterdam :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 761 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 93 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 3:45am Bottom Line:: 13X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 11.01 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 16.107 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 39.63 % faster than the average for host (64.111) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1VWBGXL5T'>https://testmy.net/stats/id-1VWBGXL5T User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.3) Gecko/20060426 Firefox/1.5.0.3 [!] still a bit slow trying out the main website :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 491 Kbps about 0.5 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 60 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/12/08 - 3:46am Bottom Line:: 9X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 17.07 sec Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 16.91 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 92.29 % of your hosts average (64.111) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-36LANUH9J User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.3) Gecko/20060426 Firefox/1.5.0.3 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.