Pete_2000 Posted June 20, 2007 CID Share Posted June 20, 2007 Here are my download stats.....verizon.net Can anyone help? Van Buren...? :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 306 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 37 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/06/20 - 8:11am Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 27.68 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 10.335 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : -100 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FPO70KBV3 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted June 20, 2007 CID Share Posted June 20, 2007 lol, cool name , I've been there Do a bit of reading http://www.testmy.net/t-3924.60 here, Start from the beginning. If you have ANY questions please post them, and we will all do whatever we can. There are many things you can do to help your connection speed out, so lets get started Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted June 20, 2007 CID Share Posted June 20, 2007 Man, ain't that a normal story. Anyway, try reading this. http://www.testmy.net/t-4257 So is that DSL, EVDO, FIOS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_2000 Posted June 21, 2007 Author CID Share Posted June 21, 2007 Thanks everyone. I have gone through the thread and most of what's up there I had already done. Spybot, Avast, ccleaner, windows updates, SP2, defrag each month etc etc, I am wondering if it's my router set up?? I had the standard Verizon DSL 1.5mbps package originally, and then was upgraded to the 3.0mbps package using a Westell 327W router/modem combo like everyone else. The 327W did not have enough wireless range, so I put it in bridge mode and use it as a modem only now, and have hooked up a Linksys WRT54GX4 with SRX400 as the wireless router. I know this setup works okay, but am concerned that my speed may be limited to my old 327W Westell acting as the modem. I have cablenut installed and am using the settings for 'fast adsl 2K' is this correct? Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted June 21, 2007 CID Share Posted June 21, 2007 So try it by passing the router altogather. Just directly to the modem and try that to find out if it is the router. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark06 Posted June 22, 2007 CID Share Posted June 22, 2007 IS THAT SPEED TEST WIRED OR WIRELESS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_2000 Posted June 22, 2007 Author CID Share Posted June 22, 2007 That's a direct wired test. I also bypassed the router as suggested - back to the original setup using the 327w, and it's about the same. Also tried at different times of the day. All tests are within 1% of each other... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark06 Posted June 22, 2007 CID Share Posted June 22, 2007 Ok please Post New Speed Test what were advertized speed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudmanc4 Posted June 22, 2007 CID Share Posted June 22, 2007 Just for shts and ggles, do a test from this NTD server @ Stanford. Post the " details , and the rest of the info , so we can see best what your connection is doing. http://netspeed.stanford.edu/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_2000 Posted June 23, 2007 Author CID Share Posted June 23, 2007 Thanks all, Ran the test and here are the 'details' ; WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 718.0kb/s running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [s2C]) . . . . . . 185.31kb/s ------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0 ------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found. Web100 reports the Round trip time = 162.32 msec; the Packet size = 1452 Bytes; and There were 21 packets retransmitted, 54 duplicate acks received, and 61 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 2 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.82 seconds (7.45%) of the time C2S throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 9.71% S2C throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 99.23% This connection is network limited 99.53% of the time. Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON Server 'netspeed.stanford.edu' is probably behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port failed] Client is probably behind a firewall. [Connection to the ephemeral port failed] Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address Server says [71.255.141.37] but Client says [192.168.1.100] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.