justinlay Posted November 14, 2007 CID Share Posted November 14, 2007 Tweaked would maybe reach that a few times during the day. But you should definately be able to go twice that fast anyway. Now grandpa has hit close a few times. And he has been tweaking. Yah hes been tweaking alot, and hes geting really good speeds. hell he probuly had that router all over his house to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 14, 2007 CID Share Posted November 14, 2007 Yah hes been tweaking alot, and hes geting really good speeds. hell he probuly had that router all over his house to. You know he has. Well as long as that is all he is tweaking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 14, 2007 CID Share Posted November 14, 2007 well hopefully i get to post my new speeds tomorrow off my new isp, there comeing out for the second time. Hopfully its a go this time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 14, 2007 CID Share Posted November 14, 2007 Your not going to be on EVDO? Yeah I forgot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 14, 2007 CID Share Posted November 14, 2007 Im switching to another Wireless ISP. going from a 2/512 to a 10/10 connection and only pay 50 bucks a month Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 14, 2007 CID Share Posted November 14, 2007 Im switching to another Wireless ISP. going from a 2/512 to a 10/10 connection and only pay 50 bucks a month OH yeah, now I remember. *DROOLS* Thats nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 15, 2007 CID Share Posted November 15, 2007 Not sure what rev means. I am having trouble playing online though? "If you leave an area with Mobile Broadband 1x EV-DO coverage, and enter an area with 1xRTT coverage, the handover is seamless. You will notice the coverage icon will change from DO to 1X, and the speed will drop from Mobile Broadband speeds, to 1xRTT speeds." from http://www.fklt.com/faq.php#1.2.4 After checking it seems that your not in an EVDO A area and will probably only experience slower speeds, but steady and no FAP. Also the CDU550 does not have the functionality for connecting a high gain antenna to it.Your problem may be that your only getting 1xRTT speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 15, 2007 CID Share Posted November 15, 2007 "If you leave an area with Mobile Broadband 1x EV-DO coverage, and enter an area with 1xRTT coverage, the handover is seamless. You will notice the coverage icon will change from DO to 1X, and the speed will drop from Mobile Broadband speeds, to 1xRTT speeds." from http://www.fklt.com/faq.php#1.2.4 Hey granpa would it say EV instead of DO?? On my blackberry ill say 1XEV then when i get out of the EVDO area ill go down to 1X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 15, 2007 CID Share Posted November 15, 2007 Hey granpa would it say EV instead of DO?? On my blackberry ill say 1XEV then when i get out of the EVDO area ill go down to 1X I have no way of knowing, I cannot get into my Pantec card since I have no laptop nor do I have a Blackberry to check this out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mtal1ca Posted November 15, 2007 CID Share Posted November 15, 2007 Pinging google.com [64.233.187.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=441ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=232ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=467ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=227ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=258ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=211ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=244ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=303ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.187.99: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Ping statistics for 64.233.187.99: Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 23, Lost = 2 (8% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 211ms, Maximum = 467ms, Average = 279ms These are my ping times. do they look decent for EVDO? And my speed is still pretty much the same. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 415 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 51 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 3:02pm Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 20.08 sec Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 20.016 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (113.157) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-FWPQ9D4G6 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 79 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Upload Speed is:: 10 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 3:04pm Bottom Line:: 1X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 102.4 sec Tested from a 386 kB file and took 40.094 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: 90% + Okay : running at 100 % of your hosts average (113.157) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZE61YHKAP User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siryak Posted November 15, 2007 CID Share Posted November 15, 2007 Not really...The speed could be better too. Do you have an external antenna? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 Here is real EVDO :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 942 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 115 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:24pm Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.9 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.007 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 284.49 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X809E5Y3O User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 Here is real EVDO ::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::: Upload Connection is:: 942 Kbps about 0.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 115 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:24pm Bottom Line:: 16X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 8.9 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 26.007 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 284.49 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X809E5Y3O User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 Damn granpa thats the slowest i think i ever seen you run Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 Damn granpa thats the slowest i think i ever seen you run That's just the upload. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 That's just the upload. Opps .. But damn thats a killer upload Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 And who said a old dog couldn't learn tweaks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 And who said a old dog couldn't learn tweaks. How long did it take you to get it where you like it?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 Well over 50 years oh, the EVDO, about 6 weeks of experimenting and firmware for the router. But now it just seems to improve on it's own by using the same tower. Could be it also picked up a little since the leaves fell. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 11460 Kbps about 11.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1399 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:51pm Bottom Line:: 200X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.73 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.692 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 54.14 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QETL9YRIF User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 Well over 50 years oh, the EVDO, about 6 weeks of experimenting and firmware for the router. But now it just seems to improve on it's own by using the same tower. Could be it also picked up a little since the leaves fell. ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 11460 Kbps about 11.5 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1399 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/15 - 6:51pm Bottom Line:: 200X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.73 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.692 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 54.14 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QETL9YRIF User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 Thats a cache test Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 Yeah its cached, we can't get past 2400, but grandpa's gotten pretty close to that. One of these days I'll have the time to spare and try to do that also. So what is the up to on the U/L? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrypeak Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 I got rid of Hugh's too! It was great! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justinlay Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 I got rid of Hugh's too! It was great! Welcome to the forum and enjoy your stay!! It feels great doent it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 16, 2007 CID Share Posted November 16, 2007 I got rid of Hugh's too! It was great! So who did you go to. And congradulations on getting rid of them. And like justinlay said, welcome to the forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pioneer_56 Posted March 22, 2008 CID Share Posted March 22, 2008 I too get to join the Death To Hughes Club, Alltel has wireless around here and I got it today. Not too bad for $10 less the Hughes and it actually works unlike Hughes and is WAY faster in the browsing of webpages! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted March 22, 2008 CID Share Posted March 22, 2008 I too get to join the Death To Hughes Club, Alltel has wireless around here and I got it today. Not too bad for $10 less the Hughes and it actually works unlike Hughes and is WAY faster in the browsing of webpages! Yep, and no satelite signal lag either. Boys is it great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.