tommie gorman Posted October 1, 2006 CID Share Posted October 1, 2006 I assume you mean to copy and paste your score to a post. No validation links in it. When the test is done http://s2.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php using the 2992 file test. "Largest - 2992 kB" Under share your score just click on "CLICK HERE to copy to your clipboard! " The blue part. And when you post just right click and paste it in here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tljbooth Posted October 2, 2006 CID Share Posted October 2, 2006 First time here :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1201 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 147 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/10/01 - 5:55pm Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 6.97 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 20.4 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 14.82 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5W4IQ1EUB User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted October 2, 2006 CID Share Posted October 2, 2006 Nice speeds there tljbooth and welcome to the forum Those speeds are great. Anything over 1000 kbps is great. Anything more merely means you get a little extra boost when downloading larger files. Grab a sack of popcorn and enjoy the show. Come back often, I think comedy hour is next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted October 2, 2006 CID Share Posted October 2, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1196 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 146 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/02 - 12:17am Bottom Line:: 21X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.01 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 20.5 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 14.34 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4D2UR0OZX User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20060127 Netscape/8.1 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 203 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 25 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/02 - 12:20am Bottom Line:: 4X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 40.96 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 120.96096 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 97.09 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PVES3A6HT User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20060127 Netscape/8.1 [!] DW7000 Pro......G11....1370 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted October 2, 2006 CID Share Posted October 2, 2006 Right on the money granpa for a 7000. And welcome to the forum Now never minding having company, but the 7000's post there speeds in here. http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?board=60.0 Now you enjoy your stay also, the door is always open. By the way grandpa, I would not waste time waiting on the 2992 file for my U/L speed test. Just use the "Medium - 579 kB " it is accurate enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted October 29, 2006 CID Share Posted October 29, 2006 A little slow tonight. I wonder where the other 6000's are hiding. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1406 Kbps about 1.4 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 172 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/29 - 2:24am Bottom Line:: 25X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.95 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 17.437 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 33.27 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NW9LPVJT6 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted October 29, 2006 CID Share Posted October 29, 2006 Ebay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted October 29, 2006 CID Share Posted October 29, 2006 Ebay You are very ornery grandpa. Hey 6000's are OK. We just don't have any upload. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 5, 2006 CID Share Posted November 5, 2006 So it's been about week, I figured I would test to see if my burst came back. Guess not. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1558 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 190 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/05 - 1:33am Bottom Line:: 27X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.39 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 15.734 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 46.7 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-H681FXOZS User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Not bad though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjventre Posted November 5, 2006 CID Share Posted November 5, 2006 I have a quick question and then I will post my speed. What does the rate code on the advanced system control center page mean? Mine is 512k 4/5 (TC). Here are my speeds: ::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1588 Kbps about 1.59 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 194 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 277 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 34 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/05 - 12:20pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZE4TF06J7 U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-L6PRXU345 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostmaster Posted November 5, 2006 CID Share Posted November 5, 2006 It's your "turbo code" which basically defines how well your system will transmit. Most DW7000+ users will see a rate code of 256k 2/3 (TC) and will see 175--200K uploads. Many, like myself, will see 256k 4/5 (TC) which isn't much different than the 2/3 speed, but I've noticed that you get better consistency closer to the 200 mark. You having the 2W transmitter and business plan get the 512K rate codes. Some relate the rate code to actual speed of uploads. Ex. 256K 4/5 means that you can get up to 4/5 of 256k, or around 200k. That isn't necessarily true, but usually is the case. In any case, if you have a rate code of 256K 1/2 or 128K */*, there is something wrong with your system, and performance will suffer. Usually, the rate code is indicative of how well your systems is pointed, and the condition of your setup alltogether. You can attempt to increase your rate code by "force ranging", which is a function on your advanced page. if your system functions fine, I wouldn't do it, as you may end up with an undesired rate code. If you do however, you can force range as many times as you like, so you can get it back up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjventre Posted November 5, 2006 CID Share Posted November 5, 2006 Thanks for the reply ghostmaster! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigR_usa Posted November 6, 2006 CID Share Posted November 6, 2006 we have a DW6000 but are download speeds range from about 200 K to 750K, on the $59.95 a month plan is the the next step up $70 a month any faster, the web pages shows "up to" 1MB are the DW7000 any better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 6, 2006 CID Share Posted November 6, 2006 we have a DW6000 but are download speeds range from about 200 K to 750K, on the $59.95 a month plan is the the next step up $70 a month any faster, the web pages shows "up to" 1MB are the DW7000 any better? Welcome to the forum Post a speed test with the 2992 file test. I believe I can get you a little faster. I am also on the 6000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 9, 2006 CID Share Posted November 9, 2006 Not bad. A little slow I think. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1524 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 186 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/08 - 11:58pm Bottom Line:: 27X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.51 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.078 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 43.23 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MPKYQFI02 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] ____________________________________________________________________________ Wow, a third test shows it even better. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1624 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 198 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/09 - 12:06am Bottom Line:: 28X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.17 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 15.094 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 52.63 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4R2KJHNC9 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 24, 2006 CID Share Posted November 24, 2006 Guess it is running a little slow tonight. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1497 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 183 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/24 - 1:04am Bottom Line:: 26X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.6 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.375 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 40.96 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-T2WJI0O7D User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 24, 2006 CID Share Posted November 24, 2006 Guess it is running a little slow tonight. That's OK by me Tommie, I've noticed slow down (in) myself the past several years. helps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 25, 2006 CID Share Posted November 25, 2006 That's OK by me Tommie, I've noticed slow down (in) myself the past several years. helps But I can not drink coffee regularly any more. The oil in it effects me badly. Even drank tea for a while. Finally had to dorp that even. Switched to pepsi for a while then. Presently I am able to drink about 2-3 Pepsi's a day alright. And I actually feel a bit better. (I know, like you wanted to hear all that) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 25, 2006 CID Share Posted November 25, 2006 Presently I am able to drink about 2-3 Pepsi's a day alright. And I actually feel a bit better. (I know, like you wanted to hear all that) That and Coke I use to clean metal. Water,water, water, thats what works the best for me. Use enough to flush the oil out or don't use oily water to make your coffee, especially at your age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 26, 2006 CID Share Posted November 26, 2006 I almost forgot the oily water one. That skeeps the insides moving.( right to the toilet kidding.) It upset the ol stomach. Anyhow tonights speeds. A little slower I think. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1451 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 177 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/26 - 12:39am Bottom Line:: 25X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.79 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.891 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 36.5 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GIUSOX8Q0 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] But still not bad for an old 500/50 6000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted November 26, 2006 CID Share Posted November 26, 2006 I almost forgot the oily water one. That skeeps the insides moving.( right to the toilet kidding.) It upset the ol stomach. Anyhow tonights speeds. A little slower I think. ::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 1451 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 177 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/26 - 12:39am Bottom Line:: 25X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.79 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.891 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 36.5 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GIUSOX8Q0 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) But still not bad for an old 500/50 6000. Your advertised is 500? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Yes it is. Wanna trade. The upload really sucks! Almost wonder if I should use dial-up for my upload. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granpa Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 Yes it is. Wanna trade. The upload really sucks! Almost wonder if I should use dial-up for my upload. Good idea Tommie, would you, would it give me more bandwidth? I have no phone line you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 27, 2006 CID Share Posted November 27, 2006 I live close enough for the phone line. Too many big farmers around not to have that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommie gorman Posted November 28, 2006 CID Share Posted November 28, 2006 Finally my baby is back at least for tonight. It always works a little better right after a storm leaves. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1755 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 214 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/11/28 - 12:36am Bottom Line:: 31X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.79 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.968 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 65.25 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BE8IFCJ53 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) [!] And I don't care what you call it. *pets his modem* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.