lumpy Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Are these any good for Direcway? Pinging yahoo.com [66.94.234.13] with 32 bytes of data Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=821ms TTL=52 Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=776ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=787ms TTL=52 Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=801ms TTL=52 Ping statistics for 66.94.234.13: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 776ms, Maximum = 821ms, Average = 796ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 try pinging with about 50 hops: ping -n 50 testmy.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lumpy Posted September 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Okay here is 50 hops stats Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% lo Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 679ms, Maximum = 1685ms, Average = 870ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Okay here is 50 hops stats Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lumpy Posted September 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Yea that could be done. I have noticed to like 4 weeks ago I noticed my download speeds had increesed from 700kbps to about 1000kbps and the ping time requests were like WAY over 1,000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tm24ns58 Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Here is my ping results. Just to compare to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Here is my ping results. Just to compare to. Looks pretty typical. Similar to lumpy's speeds, a little bit slower. I'd say your ping stats are good lumpy. What do you get for speed tests? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lumpy Posted September 13, 2005 Author CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Looks pretty typical. Similar to lumpy's speeds, a little bit slower. I'd say your ping stats are good lumpy. What do you get for speed tests? :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1242 Kbps about 1.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 152 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Sep 13 17:10:36 CDT 2005 Bottom Line:: 22X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.74 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 53.71 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-84N01X29C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 pin looks ok. remember, you're bouncing that ping all the way into geosync orbit and back. even at light speed, that takes some time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FallowEarth Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Have you tried the Cablenut settings found HERE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kol Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 no loss, and I've seen higher times with DWAY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Fan Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 my pings have been really slow lately... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Fan Posted September 13, 2005 CID Share Posted September 13, 2005 Tooo Compare ........ You've got a smiley faced cursor? I can't imagine how slow your computer is.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kol Posted September 14, 2005 CID Share Posted September 14, 2005 You've got a smiley faced cursor? I can't imagine how slow your computer is.. No Its Fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toad56 Posted September 14, 2005 CID Share Posted September 14, 2005 C:Documents and SettingsToadman>ping -n 50 testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=660ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=666ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=674ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=801ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=784ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=785ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=699ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=718ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=668ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=795ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=681ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=766ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=695ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=773ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=740ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=805ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=661ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=632ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=707ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=849ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=811ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=837ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=749ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=716ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=766ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=712ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=747ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=697ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=683ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=650ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=693ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=786ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=741ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=739ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=721ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=799ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=683ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=717ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=779ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=717ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=636ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=667ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=731ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=646ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=701ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=651ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=774ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=709ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=695ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=693ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 632ms, Maximum = 849ms, Average = 724ms C:Documents and SettingsToadman>^A^A C:Documents and SettingsToadman> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swilson-ccvn Posted September 22, 2005 CID Share Posted September 22, 2005 Lumpy and toad must live on the top of Mount Everest Good pings for sat I would say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.