antoniwan Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 well... only 1 thing left to do. let's phone those bitches up ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanto Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 I sent a email to Onelink PR on February 8 and they send me a reply this 21 February, 06 this is what they told me: (The reply is in spanish so if anyone here don't know what means go here and translate: http://babelfish.altavista.com/ Actualmente estamos haciendo unos cambios en nuestros servidores debido al nuevo cambio de compa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nullfied Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 Why didn't we all get that email?... *sighs* They must assume most users wont notice the difference... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordi Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 Actualmente estamos haciendo unos cambios en nuestros servidores debido al nuevo cambio de compa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creepingdeath Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 osva is one of the lucky ones... look at my ping test: Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=240 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sucredi Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 judging from what's been happening over the weekend I'd have to agree with a few fellows in the board: time to call up onelinkpr and start bitching: 1) call them up and request them to uncap the bandwidth. that means everything, from p2p to skype (Voice over IP) and online gaming 2) request for them to provide real data about current latency (The time between initiating a request for data and the beginning of the actual data transfer.) which means they have tell you when they expect the packet loss problem to be solved. 3) ask them whether they'll be "experimenting" during the nights so as to prevent frustration during that time because the internet's messed up 4) tell them you want credit for the nights your connection has been unstable due to latency and timeout problems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robocop Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 I haven't used skype in a wile ... is true that skype is blocked or something funny is happening with the program? I just need confirmation. *searches for gun and ready* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sucredi Posted February 27, 2006 CID Share Posted February 27, 2006 I haven't used skype in a wile ... is true that skype is blocked or something funny is happening with the program? I just need confirmation. *searches for gun and ready* yes, a tech support supervisor told me skype was one of the programs being blocked in order to test customer reactions for when they launch (onelink) their own VoiP (voice over ip) service similar to Skype but one they'll charge you for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osva Posted February 28, 2006 CID Share Posted February 28, 2006 osva is one of the lucky ones... look at my ping test: Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=240 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=240 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=240 I don't think so. That test was at 6:10 in the morning... nevermind look at this 10:36 PM Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=266ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=49 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 70ms, Maximum = 266ms, Average = 89ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robocop Posted February 28, 2006 CID Share Posted February 28, 2006 yes, a tech support supervisor told me skype was one of the programs being blocked in order to test customer reactions for when they launch (onelink) their own VoiP (voice over ip) service similar to Skype but one they'll charge you for. WTFF THEY CAN'T JUST BLOCK THAT PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU SRY! Thats like ..... onelink block live broadcast because they want you to use their cable tv. I will install it here to see if true .... O GOD PLZ BE BLOCKED SO I CAN HAVE A REASON TO KILL IN LIFE! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jquinones Posted February 28, 2006 CID Share Posted February 28, 2006 Does anyone know if we can sue Onelinkpr? Or maybe complain to DACO or "La Junta de Telecomunicaciones" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antoniwan Posted February 28, 2006 CID Share Posted February 28, 2006 Does anyone know if we can sue Onelinkpr? Or maybe complain to DACO or "La Junta de Telecomunicaciones" lol dude. read up the whole thread. DACO, FCC, u name it. one step @ a time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSavior Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 Well it should be getting better, its March 1 tomorow... my latencies.. sitll bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jquinones Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 Still Sucks ::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 617 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 386 kB) Download Speed is:: 75 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Tue Feb 28 2006 21:29:58 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB download in 13.65 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 29.16 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-8M0BLIKRX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackyandjoe Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 Well all I can tell you is that i believe they are working on it, its just taking them some time, B4 I used to be bellow 1.00 mbps this are my results today.... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10332 Kbps about 10.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1261 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Thu Mar 2 07:57:24 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 185X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 388.51 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X2HQLZ84N Cant complaint about that, one thing i got to say is that I do not achieve this speed on pick hours though... so they still restricting somethings during those hours, and of course i still have problems with the port blocking issue, it seem they blocking everything throuth our cable/modem which I suspect is one of those cablemodems with router built in features.... just my 2 cents... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DURACELL Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 Well all I can tell you is that i believe they are working on it, its just taking them some time, B4 I used to be bellow 1.00 Mbps this are my results today.... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 10332 Kbps about 10.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1261 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Thu Mar 2 07:57:24 UTC-0400 2006 Bottom Line:: 185X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.81 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 388.51 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-X2HQLZ84N Cant complaint about that, one thing i got to say is that I do not achieve this speed on pick hours though... so they still restricting somethings during those hours, and of course i still have problems with the port blocking issue, it seem they blocking everything throuth our cable/modem which I suspect is one of those cablemodems with router built in features.... just my 2 cents... EXPLAIN ME HOW YOU GOT 10.3 MBPS DID YOU UNCAPPED YOUR CABEL MODEM??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajmarie Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 EXPLAIN ME HOW YOU GOT 10.3 Mbps DID YOU UNCAPPED YOUR CABEL MODEM??? I will like to give him the benefit of doubt. It is possible that Onelink by mistake uncapped all the bandwidth or he just get lucky. He need to make some more speed tests possibly with 10MB to be sure. Anyway....in the morning I was getting around 1 MB of speed. So I guess the issues havent resolved completly, but yesterday I was able to play Halo2 without any problem. I havent played B:MC for a long time so that will be a better indicator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antoniwan Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 ummm.. sexy -------------------------------------------- :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2937 Kbps about 2.9 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 359 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Mar 01 2006 09:48:43 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 52X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.85 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 38.8 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-O1VMWE0PC :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 370 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 45 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server1) Test Time:: Wed Mar 01 2006 09:49:24 GMT-0400 (SA Western Standard Time) Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 22.76 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 25.42 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5I6X1WAJ7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordi Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3330 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 406 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Wed Mar 1 11:03:33 EST 2006 Bottom Line:: 59X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.52 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.37 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SPX4IHCR3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 Well my DNS yesterday was dead, at least from 6 pm upwards couldn't use it. Checked it this morning and at least DNS was alive again. Onelink is becoming synonymous with mediocrity. This thread is getting pretty darn big. I am *THIS* close to going with a competitor. Anything new out there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3330 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 406 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Wed Mar 1 11:03:33 EST 2006 Bottom Line:: 59X faster than 56K 1MB download in 2.52 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 57.37 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SPX4IHCR3 Did you clear your cache before doing the tests? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 WTFF THEY CAN'T JUST BLOCK THAT PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU SRY! Thats like ..... onelink block live broadcast because they want you to use their cable tv. I will install it here to see if true .... O GOD PLZ BE BLOCKED SO I CAN HAVE A REASON TO KILL IN LIFE! lol WTF?? I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS! , MAN! ...If this is true then this is getting ridiculous , those onelink guys have to be really fuckin stupid. And what the hell is all this testing they're doing? They are doing them in live production servers that serves thousands of customers, it not a FUCKING test box, They wanna test? ok do it, but don't do it on my dollar. I really hope the people in charge at Onelink suffer something like .... like a kidney stone the size of Mt Everest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajmarie Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 size of Mt Everest........lol...man ur comment made me laugh. Though I agree with ur other part of the comment, ie testing through a seperate box rather then messing the servers which are already serving thousands of subscribers. They are using our money to play around. Also...3 months+ for testing and changing....what kind of network admins they hire....high school students Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted March 1, 2006 Author CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 Well my DNS yesterday was dead, at least from 6 pm upwards couldn't use it. Checked it this morning and at least DNS was alive again. Onelink is becoming synonymous with mediocrity. This thread is getting pretty darn big. I am *THIS* close to going with a competitor. Anything new out there? i think mediocre is pushing it. they aren't that good. thank you, onelink, for comfirming every single prejudice about puerto rico! i guess it's time for all of you to cancel your service and go with a competitor run from the mainland. (maybe then i will get some decent speed here.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zangetsu Posted March 1, 2006 CID Share Posted March 1, 2006 Well I am in the Bayamon area and since yesterday around 2:00 am i can't download squat through anything.I was downloading some stuff through my newsgroups server and the connections to the server kept timing out,but today is worse i can't even do a speed test here because the test starts and then it just sits there doing nothing.What in the hell are these Craplink @$wipes doing.:sigh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.