osva Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 I will like to give him the benefit of doubt. It is possible that Onelink by mistake uncapped all the bandwidth or he just get lucky. He need to make some more speed tests possibly with 10MB to be sure. Anyway....in the morning I was getting around 1 MB of speed. So I guess the issues havent resolved completly, but yesterday I was able to play Halo2 without any problem. I havent played B:MC for a long time so that will be a better indicator. That test was made with 12MB.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drebel Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 that's an uncapped modem or he cached the results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSavior Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 416 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 51 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: Wed Mar 1 21:45:47 EST 2006 Bottom Line:: 7X faster than 56K 1MB download in 20.08 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 19.73 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CPAYZ02T3 March 1 and its sitll terrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sucredi Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 any new info. on onelink's progress? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robocop Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 keep dreaming that craplink will be fixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSavior Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 Its gotten worse today... so im calling to complain again tomorow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creepingdeath Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 Well, they did something (i hink). Its the first time in months that I can ping an address without getting a request time out. Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsCreepingDeath>ping -t www.google.com Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes o Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osva Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 7:38 AM Your current bandwidth reading is: 3.65 Mbps which means you can download at 466.9 KB/sec. from our servers. http://speed1.prtc.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterfea Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 Has anyone called in the past few days (including today) and asked onelinkpr techies what the progress of their Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterfea Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 7:38 AM Your current bandwidth reading is: 3.65 Mbps which means you can download at 466.9 kB/sec. from our servers. http://speed1.prtc.net The only reason why it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSavior Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 Just called. they said its happening "Sometime in march".... and that the routers were finnaly moved from adelphia last weekened.. jeeze. its been 2 months and still no set date.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robocop Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 Just called. they said its happening "Sometime in march".... and that the routers were finnaly moved from adelphia last weekened.. jeeze. its been 2 months and still no set date.. keep dreaming that craplink will be fixed. Keep giving money to them, so they can still fix it "some time in march:, end march. "some time in april", end april, "some time in june", end june ... so on. WHAT A JOKE! every month craplink is millions more richer and craped more service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordi Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 Did you clear your cache before doing the tests? No, I did not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackyandjoe Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 well, here are more test after 4:00pm here at PR.. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4696 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 573 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/02 - 1:29pm Bottom Line:: 84X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.79 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 123.3 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-3RSL4XT1M :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 4738 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 578 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/02 - 1:37pm Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.77 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 125.3 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YKEM68ZLF and yess is true they already changed the routers from adelphia to sprint, i also did a test with virtual route look... ===================================================================================== === VisualRoute ® 2006 Server Edition (v10.0e) report on Mar 3, 2006 4:46:12 PM === ===================================================================================== Report for [host-xx-xx-xx-xx.onelinkpr.net] Analysis: IP packets are being lost past network "San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN" at hop 13. VisualRoute cannot determine the next network at hop 14. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Hop | %Loss | IP Address | Node Name | Location | Tzone | ms | Graph | Network | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 0 | | 205.234.111.185 | DTG316.visualware.com | * | | | | Defender Technologies Group, LLC DEFENDER-1 | | 1 | | 205.234.111.129 | r03-8.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | -05:00 | 0 | x | Defender Technologies Group, LLC DEFENDER-1 | | 2 | | 205.234.111.17 | r01.iad.defenderhosting.com | Washington, DC, USA | -05:00 | 1 | x | Defender Technologies Group, LLC DEFENDER-1 | | 3 | | 208.173.50.153 | - | ?Cary, NC, USA | -05:00 | 0 | x | Savvis SAVVIS | | 4 | | 208.173.50.166 | sl-st21-ash-5-1.sprintlink.net | Ashburn, VA, USA | -05:00 | 0 | x | Savvis SAVVIS | | 5 | | 144.232.20.135 | sl-bb26-rly-6-0.sprintlink.net | Relay, MD, USA | -05:00 | 18 | x--- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 6 | | 144.232.14.173 | sl-bb22-rly-9-0.sprintlink.net | Relay, MD, USA | -05:00 | 3 | x- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 7 | | 144.232.7.253 | sl-bb21-rly-12-0.sprintlink.net | Relay, MD, USA | -05:00 | 6 | x-- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 8 | | 144.232.20.176 | sl-bb21-atl-6-0.sprintlink.net | Atlanta, GA, USA | -05:00 | 19 | x- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 9 | | 144.232.20.127 | sl-bb20-orl-14-2.sprintlink.net | Orlando, FL, USA | | 36 | x---- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 10 | | 144.232.8.22 | sl-st20-mia-4-0.sprintlink.net | Miami, FL, USA | | 63 | -x------- | Sprint SPRINT-INNET9 | | 11 | | 144.223.64.138 | sl-sanju-1-0.sprintlink.net | ?Kansas City, MO | | 32 | x | Sprint/United Information Service SPRINT-INNET | | 12 | | 70.45.94.74 | host-70-45-94-74.onelinkpr.net | ?San Juan, Puerto Rico | -04:00 | 55 | x | San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN | | 13 | 30 | 70.45.94.97 | host-70-45-94-97.onelinkpr.net | ?San Juan, Puerto Rico | -04:00 | 54 | x | San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN | | ... | | | | | | | | | | ? | | xx.xx.xx.xx | host-xx-xx-xx-xx.onelinkpr.net | ?San Juan, Puerto Rico | -04:00 | | | San Juan Cable, LLC SJCL-SAN-JUAN | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ they still having problems here at the island because they only have 2 servers, they need to fix that, one interesting thing is that i hit the link in the host 7 and here is the info it gave me.. Administrative Contact: engleman, jeffrey [email protected] Urb industrial tres monjitas 1 calle manuel camunas san juan, puerto rico 00918 PR 787-717-8080 787-250-7570 there you go now go and attack that dude by phone calls and emails... hehehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
necrogoldo Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 dude, if I were you I would delete that, you can't post names of ISP employees here, someone was warned about that some time ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jquinones Posted March 2, 2006 CID Share Posted March 2, 2006 This is just plain stupid ... with adelphia I used to get 2.5 Mbps minimum. The bastards at support just say "we do not guarantee bandwidth". F them ... Your connection is: 832 Kbps or 0.8 Mbps You Downloaded at: 102 kB/s You are running: 15 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 10.04 second(s) Member Ident: Username:jquinones CompID:6461232845 Test Time:: 2006/03/02 - 4:22pm Test ID: P3DV986KS (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 39.58 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) This was tested from a 579 kB file and took 5.703 seconds to complete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creepingdeath Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 Dman! I hate Onelink! Maybe they'll fix the problem the next millenium... year 3000 C:Documents and SettingsCreepingDeath>ping www.google.com -t Pinging www.l.google.com [64.233.161.99] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242 Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=242 Request timed out. Reply from 64.233.161.99: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robocop Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 can we make a poll here? [glow=red,2,300]CRAPLINK SUCKS MONKEY BALLS![/glow] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajmarie Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 at 1 AM :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2686 Kbps about 2.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 328 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (main) Test Time:: 2006/03/02 - 10:05pm Bottom Line:: 48X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.12 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 28.09 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XC5Z8O2TM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unpainted Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 2.30 am Your connection is: 1056 Kbps or 1.1 Mbps You Downloaded at: 129 kB/s You are running: 19 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 7.94 second(s) Member Ident: Username:unpainted CompID:6460807704 Test Time:: 2006/03/02 - 11:29pm Test ID: OSXIP58AD (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 50.36 % of your hosts average (onelinkpr.net) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 23.203 seconds to complete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robocop Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 5:01 am Your connection is: 2490 Kbps or 2.5 Mbps You Downloaded at: 304 kB/s You are running: 44 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 3.37 second(s) Member Ident: Username:Robocop CompID:64612570494 Test Time:: 2006/03/03 - 2:02am Test ID: O03WH4AVS (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Looks Great : 18.74 % faster than the average for host (onelinkpr.net) This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 9.844 seconds to complete Can't be more crap than THIS!!! [glow=green,2,500]F Y CRAPLINK![/glow] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hbyte Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 any word on when they'll unblock or unlimit bittorrent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
necrogoldo Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 any word on when they'll unblock or unlimit bittorrent? I bet never, thats why I hate them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sucredi Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 they have not capped the gaming. Not that I know of, i've been able to play weekends with no problems on onelink. The problem is that during hours in which there is a lot of traffic the routers can't handle the load or we don't have enough bandwidth and thus you can't play. Simple as that, I've also been able to download torrents with no problems true not running at 300k or 250k it's been some time but i've seen them up to 100k. Now you guys are all working on rumors as I said before. Wait for the fix to be done then test your P2P if it continues then you have all the right to bitch and moan about it. But since onelink still has issues all you can do is sit tight and wait until they get fixed. March 1st is next week. that means it's time to call them even more now people. the majority of you are paying $55 a month and obviously it's not just for simple web browsing and checking your e-mail... so let's start calling them up and force them to provide customer satisfaction. hell, even drebel encourages you (and he usually is pro-Onelink)... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sucredi Posted March 3, 2006 CID Share Posted March 3, 2006 ok, this is how Onelinkpr is messing with its clients who use BitTorrent. they Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.