Jump to content

Test my Cablenut Custom file update


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...

seems to work bettert with old ccs setting .... new one for cable/5mb connection tends to hiccup about 1 second into it...only able to achieve low 4's w/ new....4.8 w/ old settings

ddriesse

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 4779 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)

Download Speed is:: 583 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Fri Feb 4 08:36:38 EST 2005

Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.76 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-7ANPOG6HY

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the feedback ddriesse :)

I have reduced the TCP windowsize and GlobalMaxTcpWindowsize to fit most ppl, but there will always need some finetuning, and if i receive more ppl on 5 Mbps package reporting this i will change it again

to finetune that check this guide http://thegamer.serveftp.com/FAQ.htm

start here " 25. Run this TCP analyzer http://forums.speedguide.net:8117/ "

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

will do....

from the tcp analyzer below:

SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer

TCP properties for IP = 68.205.229.24 ()

Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405b401010402

MTU = 1500

MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460

Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits

Unscaled Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS

Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2569.6 kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1027.84 kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 37 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you using this file

C:ProgramCablenutVanBurens_cablenut_settings_version_4vanburens_cablenut_settings_version_CABLE_FIBER_DIAL-UPWinXP_2K_CABLE_DSLMSS1460

Cable & DSL 5000 768.ccs

that file has a DefaultRecivewindow of  624640 and thats the value you should see in that analyzer with SP2 installed

and the tcp analyzer says you have 64240

thats typical for ppl that dosent have SP2 installed, cos they read the TcpWindowsize and not DefaultReceivewindow

so something is way wrong on your end, cos the Analyzer works great.

its reporing my DefaultReceivewindow and not TcpWindowSize...

TCP options string = 020405b40103030301010402

MTU = 1500

MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460

Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 384000

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits (scale factor of 6)

Unscaled Receive Window = 48000

For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.

Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)

64240 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 15360 Kbps (1920 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 6144 Kbps (768 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 51 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00110000

Precedence (priority) = 000 (routine)

Delay = 0 (normal delay)

Throughput = 1 (high throughput)

Reliability = 1 (high reliability)

Cost = 0 (normal cost)

and my TcpWindowSize is 64240

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

New settings using SmarTest:

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 4944 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB)

Download Speed is:: 603 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Fri Feb 4 11:43:01 EST 2005

Bottom Line:: 88X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.7 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-KSB6139EF

With no progress bar :(

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 4741 Kbps about 4.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB)

Download Speed is:: 579 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Fri Feb 4 11:45:57 EST 2005

Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.77 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-O3W9NM02B

Link to post
Share on other sites

SpeedGuide.net TCP/IP Analyzer

TCP properties for IP = 68.205.229.24 ()

Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR

1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405b40103030401010402

MTU = 1500

MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460

Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 624640

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 4 bits (scale factor of 8)

Unscaled Receive Window = 39040

For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.

Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)

64240 (MSS x 44) 

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 24985.6 kbps (3123.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 9994.24 kbps (1249.28 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 53 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000

19237676 connections tested since 03.10.2001.

Analyzer version: 1.05 - updated 08.14.2003.

............................

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 4584 Kbps about 4.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)

Download Speed is:: 560 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Sat Feb 5 14:58:29 EST 2005

Bottom Line:: 82X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.83 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-TGIKSHXCM

......................

with old ccs fas cable modem settings

:::.. Download Stats ..:::

Connection is:: 4762 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)

Download Speed is:: 581 KB/s

Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/

Test Time:: Sat Feb 5 15:05:01 EST 2005

Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.76 sec

Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/id-V406XWJP3

with old ccs settings

TCP options string = 020405b401010402

MTU = 1500

MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460

Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240

RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits

Unscaled Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS

Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:

513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)

256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)

128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2) 

bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2569.6 kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1027.84 kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 37 hops

TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000

19237787 connections tested since 03.10.2001.

Analyzer version: 1.05 - updated 08.14.2003.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted both analyzer results and both copy and paste results from your download test file. The old ccs test file ( cable_fast_2k.ccs still seems tp produce faster results than the MSS1460 cable and dsl 5000 384.ccs.....sorry for the confusion on the earlier post....Dave

also try my version 3 file, i reduced the TcpWindowSize in the version 4, but your connection might need the larger value

i attach it here

good luck

VanBuren :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...