Blunted 2

sorry man with those tests i think you just have powerboost and thats it

yes they can easily handle it dslreports.com speed test: 23120 / 3795 (Kbps) (2822.3 / 463.3 KB/sec) Compared to the average of 567 tests from optonline.net: * download is 127% better, upload is 90% better

DOCSIS Downstream Upstream 1.0 38 Mbps 10 Mbps 2.0 40 Mbps 30 Mbps 3.0 160 Mbps 120 Mbps you never posted a test from here www.speakeasy.net/speedtest or http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS

not for all the users at 1 time it isnt

if they can do it then why dont they? i dont think they can since the fastest teir they have is 16/1 and its only in areas with fios around. comcast is only docsis 1.1 which i dont think it can do those speeds

he says the upload is 768 still

i tried to get on the beta for 50/50 but i cant because its not in my area yet

what programs you using cause some throw it off a bit and i just find it hard to believe. comcast doesnt even offer its highest tier in all of its area's yet and didnt even finish this old upgrade yet so why wwould they offer a new 1 and still keep that slow 768 upload. if its right then good for you man just show me some proof if you get it sometime do a speedtest on these http://www.testmy.net/tools/test/d_load.php?&st=st&tt=1&ta=1&top=000&out_src=20MB www.speakeasy.net/speedtest http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest

the modem doesnt matter its the ISP and if it responds to SNMP it will work. try the program i said above with the graphs and post what that says

you know what try this program with windows xp http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robin.d.h.walker/docsdiag/#runwin download docsdiag and when you open the folder click the 2kXP-win and type java -jar docsdiag.jar -vvv>output.txt and then look in the folder that you downloaded and a file called output will be there. attach it in your next post and i'll tell you what your cap is and until you do it i wont believe you. sorry but i need the facts here is a program thet will make a graph of what speeds you downloaded at if you want to try it

i dont know but i have seen some weird comcast tests and i dont think they are coming out with that cause they dont even have there 16/1 service out in all area's where fios is and that makes me think its not real unless they announced it. my isp is coming out with a 50/50 that is in beta and they announced it and will be available in Q1 of 2007 so until it is announced i dont believe it. sorry but thats me i need facts

well just wait a little and i bet some powerboost users come in here and post what you have and i said the same thing to them. some get that high and even for that long of a download for some reason.

i still think its powerboost cause i looked at your scores and alot of other powerboost users get those speeds way after the 45 second mark. sorry but i still doubt it

you just have powerboost and thats probably cached so clear your cache and try again

NYC Optimum Online 30/5 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 12652 Kbps about 12.7 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1544 kB/s Tested From:: http://aus.matrixau.com Test Time:: 2006/12/14 - 12:30am Bottom Line:: 221X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.66 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 13.579 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 20.12 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-OXVPM8IKB User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 2324 Kbps about 2.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 284 kB/s Tested From:: http://aus.matrixau.com Test Time:: 2006/12/14 - 12:19am Bottom Line:: 41X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 3.61 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 10.547 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 116.39 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SC5P9274M User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>tracert 59.167.255.16 Tracing route to 59.167.255.16 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Eebobb.NeT [192.168.1.1] 2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.50.192.1 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.lybrny.cv.net [167.206.33.34] 4 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms r4-ge9-2.mhe.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.33.5] 5 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms r2-srp9-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [65.19.104.211] 6 8 ms 7 ms 9 ms 451be0b4.cst.lightpath.net [65.19.96.180] 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 15 ms 16 ms 15 ms as-0.r21.asbnva01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.9 ] 9 15 ms 14 ms 15 ms ae-0.r20.asbnva01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.1 6] 10 88 ms 90 ms 89 ms p64-2-2-0.r20.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.25 0.5.34] 11 182 ms 224 ms 222 ms xe-1-4.r02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2 .29] 12 91 ms 91 ms 91 ms gig0-2.bdr1.sjc2.internode.on.net [129.250.11.98 ] 13 244 ms 243 ms 243 ms pos3-0.bdr1.syd7.agile.on.net [203.16.213.42] 14 245 ms 245 ms 246 ms gi0-1.bdr1.syd6.agile.on.net [150.101.120.65] 15 242 ms 242 ms 242 ms pos3-0.cor1.cbr1.agile.on.net [203.16.212.238] 16 246 ms 247 ms 248 ms 59.167.255.16 Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb> Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>ping 59.167.255.16 -n 10 Pinging 59.167.255.16 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=247ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=248ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=248ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=51 Reply from 59.167.255.16: bytes=32 time=247ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 59.167.255.16: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 246ms, Maximum = 248ms, Average = 246ms C:Documents and SettingsEebobb> I get a better upload to this mirror but my download was worse :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 3493 Kbps about 3.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 426 kB/s Tested From:: http://users.rawnet.com.au/~myspeed Test Time:: 2006/12/14 - 12:47am Bottom Line:: 61X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 2.4 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 7.016 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 224.63 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Y1GM8DXOU User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 9271 Kbps about 9.3 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1132 kB/s Tested From:: http://users.rawnet.com.au/~myspeed Test Time:: 2006/12/14 - 12:50am Bottom Line:: 162X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.9 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 18.531 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 88.02 % of your hosts average (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZOTKQYRI1 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 [!] Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>tracert 124.152.1.12 Tracing route to www.rawnet.com.au [124.152.1.12] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Eebobb.NeT [192.168.1.1] 2 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.50.192.1 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms dstswr1-vlan2.rh.lybrny.cv.net [167.206.33.33] 4 7 ms 9 ms 7 ms r3-ge9-2.mhe.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.33.1] 5 7 ms 11 ms 8 ms r2-srp0-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [65.19.104.195] 6 9 ms 9 ms 7 ms r1-srp0-1.in.nycmny83.cv.net [65.19.96.133] 7 8 ms 9 ms 9 ms dcr3-so-6-2-0.newyork.savvis.net [206.24.207.25] 8 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms bcs2-so-1-1-0.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.192.210 ] 9 8 ms 11 ms 30 ms bcs2-so-6-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.192.38] 10 31 ms 37 ms 32 ms dcr1-so-1-2-0.Chicago.savvis.net [204.70.192.105 ] 11 28 ms 43 ms 28 ms dcr1-so-3-0-0.Atlanta.savvis.net [204.70.192.53] 12 47 ms 47 ms 47 ms dcr1-as1.dallas.savvis.net [204.70.194.178] 13 100 ms 100 ms 103 ms bpr1-so-0-0-0.PaloAltoPaix.savvis.net [206.24.21 1.74] 14 96 ms 96 ms 97 ms singapore-telecommunications-ltd.PaloAltoPaix.sa vvis.net [206.24.241.94] 15 97 ms 97 ms 94 ms bpr1-so-7-0-0.paloaltopaix.savvis.net [204.70.19 4.73] 16 92 ms 252 ms 252 ms 203.208.148.90 17 92 ms 91 ms 93 ms 203.208.149.6 18 248 ms 247 ms 250 ms 203.208.148.90 19 265 ms 265 ms 454 ms vl174.agg1.ade102.uecomm.net.au [203.94.191.42] 20 268 ms 267 ms 268 ms 186.gi0.ar1.ade102.uecomm.net.au [203.94.191.110 ] 21 270 ms 270 ms 266 ms vl174.agg1.ade102.uecomm.net.au [203.94.191.42] 22 262 ms 263 ms 262 ms 186.gi0.ar1.ade102.uecomm.net.au [203.94.191.110 ] 23 265 ms 266 ms 290 ms 124-152-3-65.rawnet.com.au [124.152.3.65] 24 292 ms 292 ms 290 ms www.rawnet.com.au [124.152.1.12] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>ping 124.152.1.12 -n 10 Pinging 124.152.1.12 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=284ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=283ms TTL=43 Reply from 124.152.1.12: bytes=32 time=286ms TTL=43 Ping statistics for 124.152.1.12: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 283ms, Maximum = 291ms, Average = 286ms C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>

i doubt its real cause thats about 50 mb and his cap is 10mb

:bday: :occasion14:

here is 2 16 man games and the graph showing what it uses but depending on where the people live it could use more or less.

as far as i know RR doesn't offer 5 mb up and they don't even in area's that fios is available. the only cable ISP i know of is the 1 i have Optimum Online which can go up to 5 up and 30 down. any other ISP i have seen try to compete with fios only had 2 mb up RR included.

so what your saying is i can buy a TV and return it months later and put it toward a new 1 ?

i will upload them to my website later but i had to go back to work so i left and wondered if cable even knows about this problem.

i would post some pics but the attachments still dont work. any idea when it will be fixed cause its been a long time already

you cant host 16 man games on anything lower than 1500 Kbps upload and i'll prove it if you want me to cause i get host 90% of the time and every 16 man game uses over 1.5 mb up to 2 mb up. i would say atleast 75% of people on halo cant host a 12 man or above thats why its laggy alot on there.

lol :haha: some people put out more than others :haha: