Blunted 2

ITS CACHED RR doesnt offer that kinda speed anywhere

me too

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1295 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 158 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Oct 13 2005 03:49:45 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB download in 6.48 sec Diagnosis: 90% + Okay : running at 91.39 % of your hosts average (covad.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-BK7MI2O8R :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 1293 Kbps about 1.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 158 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Thu Oct 13 2005 03:51:20 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 23X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 6.48 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 174.52 % faster than the average for host (covad.net) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-2VOZT1P6B

http://myspeed.visualware.com/speedtest/speedtestjs.html it shows your isp's quality of service for you but i dont know how accurate it is but the speed is close to here for me atleast

they do have some routers with packetloss on dslreports. http://www.broadbandreports.com/badrouters

my friend has it now and also did you contact covad ? what happened?

ping from nyc to cali C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>tracert lax.speakeasy.net Tracing route to lax.speakeasy.net [64.81.45.2] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms r-68-xxx-xxx.xxx.nycmny83.covad.net [68.xxx.xxx.xxx 2 8 ms 7 ms 9 ms 172.31.255.253 3 6 ms 6 ms 5 ms 192.168.31.41 4 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms ge-5-0-180.ipcolo1.NewYork1.Level3.net [63.209.1 70.233] 5 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms ae-1-52.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.33] 6 73 ms 73 ms 72 ms as-0-0.bbr1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [64.159.1.157 ] 7 73 ms 72 ms 72 ms 4.68.102.11 8 72 ms 72 ms 73 ms 4.78.194.18 9 73 ms 73 ms 73 ms dns.lax1.speakeasy.net [64.81.45.2] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping lax.speakeasy.net Pinging lax.speakeasy.net [64.81.45.2] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=55 Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=55 Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=55 Reply from 64.81.45.2: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 64.81.45.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 71ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 72ms

i'm in nyc by the way

i'm in ny on sdsl and here is my ping to the sites he pinged but myspace is cross country for me so verizon ping this and see what you get. nyc.speakeasy.net and then we can see if they are really better. we also need more people to post here to see the difference. we also should make another thread comparing the 2 with ping times and trace routes to see if there is really an advantage. C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=53 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 42ms C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping myspace.com Pinging myspace.com [63.208.226.24] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=247 Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=247 Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=247 Reply from 63.208.226.24: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=247 Ping statistics for 63.208.226.24: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 71ms, Maximum = 76ms, Average = 72ms C:Documents and SettingsBlunted>ping nyc.speakeasy.net Pinging nyc.speakeasy.net [216.254.95.2] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=57 Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=57 Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=57 Reply from 216.254.95.2: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=57 Ping statistics for 216.254.95.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 7ms, Average = 6ms

http://www.testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=2659.0

SDSL is top and ADSL is bottom

you probably wont get much lower pings cause i have tested it but you might get 10 ms better if your lucky but not by much. check the isp's sla + tos and see what the average latency is for the T1 cause some places garrentee 110 ms round trip time and some offer 55 ms so check around before you get one

everyone i know or ever connected to with cable sucks for gaming and cant host for crap like the cable i had (optimum online). also i hate people saying this is better and that is better it depends where you live so there is no better one and each one has its advantages and disadvantages to live with.

i said i got 4 and 9 wrong which means 8 right

FF is fine for me and never had any problems since i got it and got away from my old problems with IE. IMO IE is crap and FF is here to stay.

what does that mean? lol

lol

mine is different also and got these settings by messing around and these work best for me. should they work best the same or should it depend on the connection?

i got 4 and 9 wrong

with networx from softperfect.com and kerio firewall. this comp is a POS and doesnt even have paint lmao so i cant prove this speed but i can prove the 18,000 kB sec lan speeds. i got this speed connecting 2 comps with directly together with cat 6 wire i made about 6 inches and 2 gigabit ethernet cards set at 1000 MB full duplex but the cpu on the POS comp is the bottleneck and was hitting 100% before i hit this speed. this was just the max it hit which was just a spike. validation link? i cant on lan have to get paint or something to get a screenshot for here

got a higher reading but it sucks for the internet cause i guess i optimized it for lan with cablenut. just got this score but my comp is maxxing out its cpu passing all this traffic 74009.87 kB/s is 606288.86 Kbps Or 606.29 Mbps ::: 72.28 MB/sec

my old speed was a little over 18,000 kB a sec and i just got this 52547.86 kB/s is 430472.07 Kbps Or 430.47 Mbps ::: 51.32 MB/sec

btw this is my 2nd account and my 1st is blunted but i'm on a different comp

i have been hosting a few hours a night and this is what i got from hosting with 3 xboxes and playing on another 1. Date Received Sent Total Dialup 9/9/2005 646 MB 374 MB 0.99 GB N/A 9/10/2005 1.21 GB 667 MB 1.86 GB N/A 9/11/2005 845 MB 984 MB 1.78 GB N/A 9/12/2005 1.59 GB 3.66 GB 5.26 GB N/A Week Received Sent Total Dialup 9/4/2005 - 9/10/2005 1.84 GB 1.01 GB 2.86 GB N/A 9/11/2005 - 9/17/2005 2.43 GB 4.66 GB 7.10 GB N/A Month Received Sent Total Dialup September 2005 4.28 GB 5.68 GB 9.96 GB N/A