Jump to content

ArcticWolf

Members
  • Posts

    194
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Speed Test

    My Results

Everything posted by ArcticWolf

  1. Wow to bad I haven't seen this earlier, but I only upgraded to the 5meg package about 2 months ago due to having line quality problems which have been repaired, but here is a test with the 5 meg package. Like 4.83megs down
  2. Not to shabby from Montreal,Canada Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=243 Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=243 Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 29ms
  3. 5meg down/800 up $29.95/month :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 4880 Kbps about 4.88 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 596 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 607 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 74 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2007/03/26 - 11:19pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4F8QLGSKU U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-I82R4CDN5 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 [!]
  4. Pretty impressive, wish i could come close to that download speed,but here are my results edit: url removed from image
  5. Sorry about that php ... i had no idea, did a search query for it under "www.speedtest.net" and nothing came up My bad
  6. From what i can tell it hasn't been posted here at TMN yet.... it's pretty accurate. http://www.speedtest.net/index.php ArcticWolf
  7. Ok if i click on properties of my DSL connection it says under Details, gives me my ip addy,DNS's etc... under compression it says none.... but under my properties for my network card, i have ip header compression turned on and i also have software compression turned on, so can someone explain to me why compression isn't working? I'm running on Win XP sp2 Thanks
  8. Well that's simple, when you run a Pentium 2 337mhz,with Win XP and 128megs of Ram and the new java script taking up resourses and lagging your whole computer and a slow ATA33 3.2gig hard drive.
  9. About a week ago,i called my ISP and asked to move from my 3 meg package to a 5 meg package... they said that my line couldn't handle 5 megs because of line quality, so they said they can milk it to 4megs.... i said to them why not.... so they changed it, according to speakeasy test I went from a 306Kb/s download to 412Kb/s ... which is great, but only on a speed test do i get those speeds, if i download a program from a website I'm getting less then my original 306Kb/s .... so what I need to know is where there is a good reliable program i can download...a large file... cause I tried downloading Google Earth, cause Google should have a good bandwidth. Anyhow, anyone have any ideas? If I could do a speed test @ testmy.net I would...but my computer is to old for that.
  10. I personally use VLC Media player.... it's great if you have a slower computer, and you don't need to have divX because it comes with the program I believe ,it also plays quicktime files without having to download quicktime. Take snapshots of videos,etc.
  11. thanks guys, it's nice to know I'm not the only who can't find em, although there is shortcut keys which do work, such as ctrl-t for new tab and ctrl-w for closing the tab and ctrl-tab to view the new tab..... but it stilll sucks cause what if you forget you have tabs open.... they still need major work on this IE 7 if M$ wants to put out competition.
  12. I swear either I'm as blind as a bat, but I can't see the tabs anywhere, if I click on open link on new tab, nothing is shown anywhere.... unlike Maxthon where it's easy as pie. Anyone have an idea or can post a pic of where they are located, thanks.
  13. Yep it's lookin good Page created in 0.155 seconds with 23 queries Great work CA3LE
  14. I found the Vista pack, that I am using now, it works well,except for the sidebar, uses up 100% of the cpu. Anyways here is the link http://www.freewarefiles.com/program_2_219_17682.html And I'll attach what it looks like
  15. It's a longhorn transformation pack http://www.soft32.com/download_3720.html
  16. I left you a PM,so We can keep this board clean
  17. ok I clicked on video but the file I wish to burn is not on the list, only other videos which I have in that directory. Plus what if I wanted to take clips that need a license and join them together to make a compilation CD, I can't
  18. Well I checked under the Burn tab in WMP 10, and it only says audio ,which to me means audio as in music, maybe I'm wrong... just didn't risk it cause I didn't want to waste a CD.
  19. I have an account at http://www.danni.com/ and they are (wmv) format, I thought maybe I can convert them to a different format after getting the license and playing it, but no dice there.
  20. This should help out anybody using utorrent http://ut-settings.go.pl/
  21. Ok here's the deal, I pay for access to a website @ 19.95/month .... now if I download any movies, I have to stay connected to the net and get a license to play it. I know they want to protect there movies, but I should have the right to burn them onto CD if I wish to do so, heck I pay the 19.95/month. And what happens if the site goes down and disappears??? Us buyers are the ones who get screwed. Unless somebody around here knows what I can do so I can actually burn these and not have to get the license online and enjoy the movies for many years to come. Love to hear your input on this and if you found a way around this problem.
  22. Check your Bios settings, like on my old computer... you had a choice to boot from SCSI or IDE,if you had IDE choosen then SCSI wouldn't work. Might not be your problem but worth a look.
×
×
  • Create New...