justinlay

well hopefully i get to post my new speeds tomorrow off my new isp, there comeing out for the second time. Hopfully its a go this time

Yah the dealership should have told him that before he even got on it. what i dont get is as you can tell this isnt his first bike to ride. You would think he would know not to get on it till slick spots are gone

Yah hes been tweaking alot, and hes geting really good speeds. hell he probuly had that router all over his house to.

So im guessing its a rev A card, which you should be able to get some good speeds off it on alltels site its says this: Alltel Wireless Internet gives you fast wireless access to the Web and your corporate network from the convenience of your laptop or smartphone. Whether you're using a smart phone or your laptop with your phone as a modem or a data card, staying connected has never been easier. Stay on top and in touch - Access your e-mail and schedule while you travel. Get more done - Connect directly to your corporate network and enterprise applications. Connect quickly and securely - Get secure connections at speeds up to 2.4 Mbps.

It should say it on your card ill say rev. 0 or A

I just love the topic line Hey Mtal1ca, You sould be able to pull some better speed with a card. Try and see if you can get a better signal? What rev. is it?

Hate to say it but thats a cache test . Clear your cache and test it again

You also got to think its a cell phone, you would see alote better speeds with a card.

yah thats a good question. ive seen him online.

My Blackberry :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 808 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Download Speed is:: 99 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/10/28 - 1:47pm Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.34 sec Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 15.172 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 77.99 % of your hosts average (myvzw.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-NDX30WTPR User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 134 Kbps about 0.1 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 16 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/10/28 - 1:49pm Bottom Line:: 2X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 64 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 35.5 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 30.11 % of your hosts average (myvzw.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CFJIL0Q6R User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]

Yah ive seen a couple different models, i think my new service runs off Canopy equipment to get 10mbps down and up. Were i live theres i think @ 6 Wireless isps now, and its growing

Im not for shur mines even motorola, but i do know its a 2.4GHz equipment. Im around 12 miles from tower direct line shot, i get -78dbm

Welcome to the forum MatthewAlan!!! Who's your isp?

Just a basic antenna with radio in it then down to a router. Here soon im changeing to another Wireless isp ill be geting 10/10 ill be sweet

Welcome to the forum!! Yah try them steps tommie have for you, them speed are really low

me neither??? But good info guys

Well after looking around for about 45 mins. I finaly found whats the difference in between the two of them. The only difference is the 100 is made by RCA/Thomson and the 700 is made by Pace. Here are the differences and they are very very minor. RF antenna is inside for -700. Its external on -100. Some have reported a greater range on the -100 -100 has 2 digital audio outs. One is RCA type coax and the other is Toslink optical. The -700 only has Toslink The -100 has a slightly larger hard drive by 20 GB. The -100 has 2 ethernet ports but its reported that the second one will never be used. The -100 is slightly cooler and has its vent on the bottom of the unit and the -700 is on the top. The top makes a fancy Directv swoosh with the holes.

One more question which model is the newer one HR20-700S or the HR20-100S?

Yah the new HR20 gets all 72 and end of this year there will be 100. I think the only part that sucks on the new HD DVRs you pay 300 bucks for the unit, and its still not yours, and you haft to commit to another 2 years. Yah dlewis them series 3 tivo are really nice, but they dont support with directv. Ive seen one that will get 50hrs i think but it had a hefty price tag for me.

Well my wife keeps buggin me to get a new dvr, Well if i get a new one its going to be HD. My question is how stable are they? Does anyone have one? Ive read some costumer reviews on them and seem alot of people are have trouble with them? The unit im talking about is the HR20-100S model. Any input would be great!

Them both are really nice monitors. Yah i do agree with you i like to get hands on with stuff like this

thats pretty cool

I have a ultra case that has a side exhaust for the CPU.This isnt my case i have posted. I think it makes a difference in the cpu temp. My core 2 duo sits around 89 degrees

Not bad speeds for smartbro, but this thread is for wildblue users

I dont think there's one for this. So im going to start one up. Post what wireless isp you have (not EvDo, Edge or anything like that) , the plan, what you pay a month, and the distance you are from the tower. My ISP: VRfuturenet, Plan 2/512 Pay 63.00, and 12 miles from tower. With no tweaks :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1807 Kbps about 1.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Download Speed is:: 221 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/10/11 - 7:14pm Bottom Line:: 32X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.63 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 13.563 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 8.01 % faster than the average for host (vrfuturenet.com) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5N2DM4GZR User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!] a little slow tonight :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 363 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 44 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/10/11 - 7:16pm Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 23.27 sec Tested from a 1013 kB file and took 22.891 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 85.21 % of your hosts average (vrfuturenet.com) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-V17JICTEL User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30) [!]