cdf216
-
Posts
235 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Speed Test
My Results
Posts posted by cdf216
-
-
Slow? i don't think so I have unlimited with 3G and have hit as high as 4400 kbps down and 1500 kbps up using the opera mini browser on the dual test. Posting from the phone right now in fact.
-
Something is wrong with the test and they may be wrong because there is no test size above 6 mb because there was issues with the bigger sizes so he removed them from the site. I have Fios and OOL internet and my 5 mb upload get about 13 mb when I do the test which says its broken.
yea ts messed up and here is my 20 mb upload which is wrong
::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::
Upload Connection is:: 37139 Kbps about 37.1 Mbps (tested with 15872 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 4534 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)
Test Time:: 2008/04/29 - 4:18am
Bottom Line:: 648X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 0.23 sec
Tested from a 15872 kB file and took 3.501 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 2719.97 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JC56LHQ08
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008032620 Firefox/3.0b5
I got a couple of the same type of results from the 15 Mb file also, but I knew those were wrong, I figured it was because of caching, I cleared the cache and tried again and get the result given in my test, which is consistent with my cap. You gotta love the 20 mb upload.
-
Here's my current upload speed now that there's finally a test over 6 mb.
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Upload Connection is:: 19863 Kbps about 19.9 Mbps (tested with 15872 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 2425 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main)
Test Time:: 2008/04/29 - 2:19am
Bottom Line:: 346X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 0.42 sec
Tested from a 15872 kB file and took 6.546 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 1409.35 % faster than the average for host (verizon.net)
U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K1W4YMXV3
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14 [!]
-
Don't mean to brag but here's my results
-
I think I can be pretty proud of this speed:
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Download Connection is:: 14564 Kbps about 14.6 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1778 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/07/10 - 4:06am
Bottom Line:: 254X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.58 sec
Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 27.359 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 203.86 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SP7X1U5TG
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4 [!]
-
for some reason I get the following scripting error:
Warning: main(/home/testmyn/public_html/outside/multi/mirror-TimPawlak-4/conf.conf_php) [function.main]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/testmyn/public_html/tools/test/main.php on line 211
Fatal error: main() [function.require]: Failed opening required '/home/testmyn/public_html/outside/multi/mirror-TimPawlak-4/conf.conf_php' (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/testmyn/public_html/tools/test/main.php on line 211
-
Here's my upload : not as fast as download but still respectable;
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Upload Connection is:: 1956 Kbps about 1.96 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 239 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/10/03 - 9:57am
Bottom Line:: 34X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.28 sec
Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 25.06464 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 384.16 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WNG69IHVD
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]
-
I actually got above my connection's rated 15 mbps. I've got RoadRunner out of BrightHouse Tampa Bay.
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Download Connection is:: 15472 Kbps about 15.47 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1889 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2006/10/03 - 7:53am
Bottom Line:: 270X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.54 sec
Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.438 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 223.48 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-W93L6GKV8
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]
-
No need for his current settings... Just use this settings file and you should be fine.. please post tests afterwards.
-
What are your advertised speeds? Never mind I found out from your provider's website it's 2000/256 with a 1 meg tier for those not capable of a 2 meg connection because of distance. Must be DSL based. Try this cablenut settings file and see if there's any change:
-
please post a test result from the download test and also your advertised speeds.
-
What brand and model?
-
If the router is only 4 feet away from the computer I'd run it wired using good quality Cat-6 cable instead of going wireless. Interference from nearby electronics can severely limit wireless speeds.
BTW if speed dropped that much from just going wireless you should definitely go wired.
-
Here's my results on the test in the link:
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 14294 Kbps about 14.3 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1745 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (server2)
Test Time:: Fri Jan 20 2006 08:40:32 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 255X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.59 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 233.43 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JPZQY26G9
-
I know terraslayer's result is cached 15 Mbps is the fastest speed you can get with roadrunner. Not even business customers can get faster than that.
-
Hold on I may have to modify the settings file. From the OP I had no Idea this was for a DSL connection and used an MTU of 1500 Here's the settings for 384/128 for a 1492 MTU :
-
I think Sharky2006 has a point. Learning that results you get are cached is quite deflating on its own, but when someone says it in a manner that is derogatory, it can be upsetting.
If a member is posting cached results, chances are it is because they don't know it's cached. If you feel the need to bring it to their attention, I would suggest also providing something constructive, like a mirror they can try, or to clear their cache, etc. etc.
Also like I stated some cached results are within the "normal" limits of some broadband plans, I almost mistook his cached result for a 15 mb FIOS result. But I can sympathize. ON my first post about my 15/2 connection I had someone tell me it was cached. Luckily though showing them a result from the 20mb flat test proved my connection to be true. don't always jump to the assumption that it's cached. especially with providers like Verizon, RR etc. They all offer very high speed options.
-
thnx cdf216! i will post the results later ok...
Edit: thanx for the file but it bring my connection from 302Kbps down to 268... sorry if i dont post the result here..
Please post a tracert to testmy.net I could not take individual latency into account and file is set to a latency of 200ms
-
good thing you found out it was a "bug" in your download cache, from the results in the 13 - 14000 range I would have thought you were on a FIOS connection and your upload needed severe tweaking
-
Here you both go a 384/128 cablenut settings file: Please post test results.
-
Here's my most recent from RR Tampa 15/2:
:::.. Download Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 14722 Kbps about 14.7 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1797 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2)
Test Time:: Fri Jan 13 2006 22:09:11 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 263X faster than 56K 1MB download in 0.57 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 243.25 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-YPJT3O9UB
:::.. Upload Stats ..:::
Connection is:: 1904 Kbps about 1.9 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 232 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1)
Test Time:: Fri Jan 13 2006 22:14:57 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Bottom Line:: 34X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 4.41 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 516.18 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-N83UROPFG
-
oops sorry saw UNL and added the V automaticlly
-
The BEFSR41 is an excellent router Yes there are a few still around from th days before linkyys merged with cisco but the routers are the same. probably better. I own the "41" myself and still use it on occasion.
-
damn, whats your advertise download and upload speeds?
your upload is f*cken fast
That's because he's using a College connection UNLV to be exact or the Universtiy of Las Vegas.
Compare your Verizon Fios Speeds ( ONLY VERIZON FIOS )
in Show off your speed
Posted
I'm in Tampa FL and here's a test of my 20/20 connection, the uload is a little slow for some reason but it isn't tweaked either.
:::.. testmy.net test results ..:::
Download Connection is:: 20873 Kbps about 20.87 Mbps (tested with 25600 kB)
Download Speed is:: 2548 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 15821 Kbps about 15.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 1931 kB/s
Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2008/09/27 - 5:47pm
D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PIMA83KWQ
U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JI32FE51S
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506) [!]