CA3LE

Just the integrated GPU. It's a virtual machine server with no need for GPU. I only need graphics to get into the bios, set up the machine and remotely manage at the base machine level. If I ever have a need for GPU I run it on one of my local machines. This puppy is built for a very specific workload. Will be racked at the datacenter in a few days. Just waiting on one more network card...

Check this out, the Ryzen 7 9700X is built on a 4 nm production process using 8,315 million transistors. I don't feel like it's getting the love it deserves. The latest AMD chips are truly amazing.

Over the decades I've always strived to have the fastest servers I can afford to host TestMy.net. My journey with hosting has taken me into a colocated datacenter where I pay for cabinet space, power & internet connection and bring in my own equipment. When I first started using colo I built everything out with brand new, current generation servers and networking gear. Over the years I added servers and built up a High Availability Proxmox cluster. Adding servers I found that eBay was definitely my friend. Now I could afford servers that only a few years earlier often went for nearly 10X what I was able to get them for "off lease". Each time I added a new server, it was more powerful than the previous. Over this time I'm adding more resources, things are getting faster. Even my first servers were full solid state, employing arrays of 4 Samsung 850 Pro SSDs. But things really started flying with the advent of Optane storage. A game changer... really, it was too good. (and now it's gone.) Fast forward to 2024. I get a generous donation of servers, the person doesn't care what I do with them, they're just happy to give them to me. They're newer than my servers, 2nd version into the next generation of CPU. So quite a bit newer. I get one of them setup with the same Optane storage I run in my current master server and start benchmarking. It's not really faster and doesn't justify switching servers. Sometimes it was slower. I assume because my servers are higher clock speed, highest end of the CPU SKU. Scratching my head, I really thought being so much newer I'd get a much better result. I take the storage out and pop it in a gaming rig... another machine recently donated to me by a friend. This PC happens to have hardware from the same year as the server I just tested. I run the same tests and had to do a double take. Not only was it faster on the gaming rig, it was WAY faster. This made me reimagine my server topology. Maybe it was time to build with consumer hardware. Here I had a setup that was a fraction of the cost that was out performing in real world scenarios. The better single thread performance and higher clock speed, faster memory... it all makes sense. There's more competition in the consumer market, things cost less. So I sold those servers to someone who can better utilize their resources. Extremely nice servers but for my use case here, they had too much of everything. As soon as they were sold I ordered parts for my next build. Promptly put it together and got to testing. Minimum, 2.5x faster at everything. Average is 3x faster and in some cases I've seen over 6x faster. It has completely blown me away. What is the magical setup? Nothing much really, minus storage I think it cost my about $900, including a piKVM setup to remotely control the machine. Much less than any of my used enterprise servers cost me. Here's my build. AMD Ryzen 7 9700X 8-Core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 Series (Intel XMP 3.0) DDR5 RAM 64GB (2x32GB) 5600MT/s CL28-34-34-89 Optane 905p (zpool) and Samsung 960 Pro (OS) ASUS Prime B650-PLUS WiFi ID-COOLING IS-40-XT Black - 47mm Height Low Profile CPU Cooler EVGA 750 BP, 80+ Bronze 750W PSU Rosewill 2U Server Chassis RSV-Z2900U BTF-LIGHTING WS2812B 2PCs 19in Individually Addressable 2GB Raspberry pi4 Geekworm KVM-A8 (kit for building a piKVM) 10G network card It's only a 65 watt TDP CPU! very easy to cool in a constrained (or SFF) build like this. A single half dollar sized CPU out performs all of my dual Xeon systems. Yes, I can't run a terabyte of RAM with this setup but I don't need to. My current systems are 128GB, I figure I only really really need 64GB with this CPU backing the system. Especially in single thread performance the new Ryzen system blows all my other systems away. This type of gain will be felt everywhere, especially in mysql queries and responsiveness. It still excels in multithread and even has a larger cache than my Xeons. It really wins for me on every level. And yes, RGB was a requirement. I never put RGB in a computer, not really my thing. But I figure this is a gaming PC at its core so for $13, why not. I can control them in linux but it adds a bunch of unnecessary packages, I like my base PVE to be as simple as possible. So default rainbow it is. lambo-2025-lq2.mp4 I haven't been necessarily doing it wrong all these years. Without the low TDP and high performance of the 9700X this build would be more challenging. These are recent developments. There's basically zero redundancy in this server. So, it also helps having a PVE cluster that has a bunch of reliable machines, to back up this consumer grade hardware. I can't wait to bring Lambo into production!

Awesome! Thank you. 😁 Welcome to TestMy.net!!

First, I've been writing in PM to @trustfor since this topic was posted. For anyone wondering why it took over 4 years for me to respond to this. trustfor just pinged the message and got me thinking about it again. I started to write this back in PM but feel it's better posted on this topic. I've continued to develop My Sensor but have never released anything. It's taken me way too long. I continue to run the program myself. Received a dozen or so credits on my Comcast bill as a result of running it and in some cases I wouldn't have known my connection went down without it. But I need to do more work to make it production ready. I'll be on my next round of development very soon. I added you to a new group, Beta 25 and will contact you before I open the beta for this. ...that is of course if you're interested in trying that program early. Now that I'm thinking about this and reading this original topic again... I think we can achieve your goal in a simpler way. The program I've been working on wouldn't just be the display, it would also run tests. But, the desktop display unit could be just a display... and then the tests could be performed by any other computer on the network. How about I tie in a simplified version of the new latency program (My Sensor) into the main site. That way we'll have nice, live latency results. I can make a simple page that shows just your last results live, graphed similar to your mockup. Then give you the ability to change the stylesheet to match your project. So your device only needs to have the ability to open a web browser.

https://stats.foldingathome.org/team/44352

You're not in the first 1000 members but you are an OG TMN member for sure. 1000th member to 10,000th is like a 6 month difference.

Wow! Your member number is right in between xs1 and cholla. You definitely deserve the Original Member badge. Welcome back. What kept you from signing in for over 20 years? I was just glancing over some of the first members. There are still a few registered in 2003 (the year the forums started here) who are still active. Pretty cool.

Hi Cholla! Happy to see you're still around.

You already said it best, "it's usable however only for loading websites" It will get you by until the next cycle. How much bandwidth do you have to use with Verizon before that limit is enforced? Are you using a dedicated hotspot device or is this a hotspot off your phone?

EDIT: scroll down first. First, here's my levels for comparison. Scrolling way over there are a lot more channels Maybe your levels are a little too high. In some cases, on the cable providers end, this is adjusted seasonally to compensate for cable length differences with temperature. In the summer, overhead cables become longer with the heat and shrink in the winter. This extra length causes a drop in signal, so it needs to be amplified to a degree. Then in the winter it needs to be turned back down. Again, this is all done on the providers end. High levels don't make things better, it can make things much worse. There's a sweet spot. Been a very long time since I was an actual cable guy... but when I was, I aimed for downstream power level to be near 0 dBmV. Mine is usually around -3 to 3 dBmV. There is something you can do about it... actually this is done on my connection right now because my levels were too high when they first installed me. Here's what I would do. Get a 3 way splitter. The type is very important... hey, an exsisting splitter could even be the issue. Here's mine for reference. Notice, 5-1002 MHz and then on the legs they say 5.5 dB ... that's -5.5 dB signal loss off those legs. A good thing, sometimes. 2 way splitters will drop 3.5 dB Most 3 way splitters drop 3.5 on one leg and 7 on the other 2. Because internally it is 2x 2 way splitters. To have a nice even 5.5 drop on all legs is kinda special, they didn't have those when I was a cable guy. For yours, maybe drop 5.5 to 7 dB. Get the splitter and cables from a Comcast store. If they only have 2 way splitters, get 2 of them. To be safe, only use cables and splitters that come from Comcast. Plus, they normally hook them up for free. . -- they really should only want you to use their connections, it saves service calls. Some cables and splitters are designed for antenna, they don't care as much about the lower and higher frequencies and they don't care as much about ingress/egress. So yeah, only use the cable providers cables, splitters and amplifiers. I don't think you need this diagram but I drew it for good measure. You may have a splitter along the line somewhere that could be to blame as well. I would trace all the way from where the cable hits the side of your house to the modem and replace any splitters, barrel connectors (they connect single cables together) or possibly bad cables along the route. Just something I would try myself before calling. BTW, in this case I would only be testing single thread. I think that's going to be the most helpful. You've seen up to 248 Mbps upload linear before, we know it's possible. https://testmy.net/db/uYQhpDzSj Please update us on any developments. And I'm sorry it took me a while to get to your topic here, I wanted to take time to properly respond... then days passed. EDIT: Looking again, I wouldn't do this. It will drop your upload signal level too low. You want 40 to 45 dBmV for upload power level. -15 to 15 dBmV for download. Trace back the lines like I said, if you don't find anything then call Comcast. Show them what you're seeing. You will have 200 Mbps again soon. This may help someone in the future.

Yes, according to my IP records in the forum... you've only been using 1 IP recently. So this is very weird. Please visit https://testmy.net/iptools click [Paste] then "Run Query" -- take a screenshot and send it to me in a PM. Maybe the IP detection is grabbing a forwarding address by mistake, under some edge case scenario. With your help we'll get it fixed.

Sorry, I gave you permission on the backend of the program but not on the frontend. It should be available for you now.

You're all set! Give it a try.

HI Ritan671, welcome! For ping, either select Latency from the main menu or enable the beta under My Settings. Let me know what you think or if you have any more questions.

Maybe contact that developer. Easier to just use TestMy.net instead. Try the beta under My Settings.

You'll get this error if you run too many tests too quickly. It should be there... but not unless you hit the test more than you did. It shouldn't happen on your first re-test like that. I was seeing it too, when combined test was used and re-test was quickly done. I made an adjustment and it now passes properly under that scenario. Thanks for the heads up.

thank you! And thank you to those who've made anonymous BTC donations! Very unexpected. You guys rule.

I'll correct that, I didn't update the old My RT program with that mirror's information yet. Thanks for catching that. That mirror is slightly different than the rest, not built into My Latency by default... unless you select that mirror, then you'll see the option. It was donated by WaveX ISP in Kenya, I own all of the other servers. Donated, but it's a full TMN server I maintain... first one. -- it also doesn't appear in the legacy multithread test right now.

You live in a very interesting location in the world. When you search for the "western most part of Europe" in Google you find Cabo da Roca. But that's totally not true. This rock, just off your island is the real western most part of Europe. That rock, from what I can see... is the end of Europe. Google Maps The Westernmost Point of Europe I feel like you're getting extremely good speeds to that remote location.

Quotes from private messages

Wow! You resurrected a 20 year-old topic! Ahh the old days, when 4 Mbps was amazing.

It really does sound like you've checked all the boxes in your troubleshooting. Was this PC performing like the others until recently? I'd like to see how you perform on the beta, it may give us more clues. go to My Settings, toggle it ON then test as you normally do. Once enabled you can Tune ☆ and increase the max text size, enable multithread, etc. Run this on the PC with the issue and on a device that's known to be working correctly so we can compare.

Using DNS in Singapore doesn't really help for your latency to the server. Latency is like the time it takes for you to send a message to your friend and for them to respond. In the world of the internet, when you click on something or ask your computer to do something online, it sends a request to another computer far away. Latency is how long it takes for that request to reach the other computer and for you to get an answer back. If it takes a long time, everything online feels slow, like when you're waiting for someone to respond to a text. When you ask your computer to load a website, it sends a message to another computer far away called a server. That server holds the information for the website you want. The message travels through wires, cables, or even space (if it’s using satellites!), and when the server gets it, it sends the website information back to your computer the same way. The time it takes for the message to go to the server and back to your computer is what we call latency. The quicker it travels, the faster things load! You can't improve this unless you're able to take a shorter path to the server. The physical distance creates unavoidable latency... the speed of light is the limiting factor. What the Latency Test is showing you is that servers in Singapore will perform best for you. Amazon is hosted on a CDN (content delivery network) so when you request using that test it pulls from a server closer to you automatically. To improve latency over long distances, here’s how it works: Use servers closer to you: Imagine a game of telephone. The closer the person, the quicker the message gets to you. Using servers that are closer (like a local one instead of one far away) speeds things up. Optimize the route: Think of taking the quickest path home. By using smarter routes (like special internet paths called "content delivery networks"), the message travels faster, just like choosing a shortcut. Use faster connections: Just like a fast car on a highway, using better internet connections helps the message travel quicker, even over long distances!

Sorry this took so long. The upload and download now have separate X-axis with date/time that syncs and makes more sense. They also have separate y-axis and are independent of each other.