CA3LE

Not really man.. I have modded my XBOX.. and it's part of my home network, I have a streaming video and audio server set up and in my living room though my xbox I choose what I want out of my library of videos and mp3s... I also have every NES,SNES, N64 and sega game made... and all except the N64 games are sitting on my XBOX hard drive... ZERO LOADING, just have to choose the game I want to play. And yes, there is more... I can type for hours about all the shit I have made my XBOX do Here is a little bit of info on XBMP one of the media players i use http://www.xboxmediaplayer.de/ ~ you also need RELAX, good dashboard software but here are some software links http://www.xboxmediaplayer.de/download_files.htm XBOX eats POOPStation for breakfast, lunch and dinner (and even snacks on them a few times between meals)

swap the compuers... it will save you troubleshooting time

HOLY FUCK! That is PiMP Well they better include shipping for that price, maybe a little hand job too.

haha... you got a fast line dude... ENJOY IT! TRuSPEED only shows on the results page and not on the forum link

that is way friggen wierd ~~ and you did upgrade the firmware... did you also try a new cat5 cable? Another idea is to swap the computers around and see if you still have a problem... if you do then is it a problem with the router

haha

let me research.. I have never thought of that.

$400-$10,000 ~~ how much do you wanna spend.. and we will tell you what ya can get

nice first post mort ~~ that is a dream machine indeed

haha, I did make something called TRuSPEED ~~ it's just a little calculation on the results page that factors in aproximate overhead... ~~ I just had to do something with that little name.

First of all... AMD processor (athlon FX is PiMP juice!) and ATI graphics (Radeon 9800 pro RAWKS!) card... SOYO Dragon mother board or any ASUS mother board (gigabyte is cool too)... you also need MAD amounts of ram, 1GB or more of PC2700 DDR or better ~~ can't forget a fast hard drive, don't just go by size, look for seek time to be low and RPM to be high... Need lots of fans and a nice case also, don't go too cheap on that shit because you can ruin your investment... blah blah

yea they like to post fake shit and take screenshots and act like they are really cool over the internet... when they are just pretenders! lol they can't hang with us though... trUspeed! I need to make some product (script of some sort called trUspeed) that's a cool name ::: Download Stats ::: Connection is: 4194 kbps about 4.2 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is: 512 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2062911 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 75 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check.cgi?num=2062911&kbps=4194&gen=gen&a=1.71428571428571&b=0&c=1145.14285714286

bunch of people like the main charactor ~~ either playing on teams or free for all matches.

Yea I have the test set to not show an auth code for people that run behind software firewalls that block the referer... because if my script can't authenticate that the test was posted by my site, someone could post from their home computer and post fake scores and such (some people have nothing better to do)

I need to get that... everyone is saying it rules

well you might like this new tool I just made... http://www.testmy.net/cgi-bin/conv.cgi

I did see that i put the wrong number on the bottom of that page... that was a mis-calculation ~ 2 kbps mis-calc ~~ but still what is your point .. hahaha

lol But if you will look at the ENTIRE benchmark I did, I used the same scale for all sites, not like I am trying to fuck with the conversion or something... testmy.net :::: +0.7 off or "+5.7344 kilobits/sec" to be exact bandwidth pl :: -12.3 off or "-100.7616 kilobits/sec" to be exact 2 wire ::::::::: -62.73 off or "-513.88416 kilobits/sec" to be exact and so on How does that make ANY differance, besides makeing the other guys look even WORSE that testmy.net ~~ the 3rd place site was off by 1/2 Mbps!! And 2nd place was 18 times less accurate than my site (oh wait, you like exact numbers 17.571 times less accurate ) So what is your whole point here RTB?

how do you figure that 3.1 is less than 0.7 hahaha

IE does a crap load of mathematics to get it's average.. and it takes into account the burst at the begining of the download... from the time that it took you to choose where you wanted to save the file... because when you click to download a file in IE it starts the download almost right away.. even when you are selecting where to save the files and what not it is downloading... this can give you scewed results, you have to litterally click the download and click enter and save it where ever to get the most accurate results in IE.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Most other sites were rounding also... some didn't ~~ I just posted exactly what was on the results page of each site. That will only have a max offset of 0.5 kbps ~~ which isn't really measurable anyway. And yes, when you download a file in Internet Explorer it does average the entire download

sometimes that all it takes ~~~ Micro :: I am glad to see that the forum is starting to pick up speed ~ gunna need some more moderators soon.

Yea.. I was just playing Halo the other day

Aww you guys are making me blush lol