FiberOptic

ok so basicly my speed is fyn..... just confuses me is that my sis could get 9.5mb+ from vans server though.........

Look at the attached image i can download at 1.15mb from a local ftp server ftp.blueyoner.co.uk...... why is it only slow on testmy net....

it dosesnt have an 10mb option only kbps..... so it should be 12000kbps right.......

quick setting change with tcp optimizer and i got this.... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 7636 Kbps about 7.64 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 932 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2006/08/15 - 12:37pm Bottom Line:: 133X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.1 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 22.5 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 146.24 % faster than the average for host (co.uk) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VWBF1IAT4 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!] shwoing signs of improvement but what settings should i be putting in, in this app....

i would use cablenut but how do i do it.... confused ( its the blondness in the genes)

i havent used any tweaks just TuneUo Utilities 06 she couldnt have tweaked her lappy (shes blonde) and she gets freaked out when she sees a popup lol...

Cleared the temp and tried again..... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 4232 Kbps about 4.23 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 517 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2006/08/15 - 12:16pm Bottom Line:: 74X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.98 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 40.593 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 36.47 % faster than the average for host (co.uk) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-CBOK8V4ZD User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

fogot to mention she uses Media Center Edition and i Have XP. she has 1Gb Ram i have 512Mb...

sorry forgot ping program Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=50 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=51 Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 113ms, Maximum = 129ms, Average = 117ms Ping Complete. Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 35 ms 27 ms 8 ms 10.18.128.1 2 22 ms 15 ms 20 ms gsr01-br.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.176.1] 3 36 ms 15 ms 25 ms pc-62-30-254-61-du.blueyonder.co.uk [62.30.254.61] 4 23 ms 25 ms 15 ms pc-62-30-254-2-du.blueyonder.co.uk [62.30.254.2] 5 28 ms 31 ms 12 ms 194.117.136.134 6 16 ms 14 ms 21 ms 194.117.148.163 7 87 ms 89 ms 89 ms so-4-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.27.57] 8 86 ms 91 ms 84 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.29.122] 9 112 ms 120 ms 117 ms so-6-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.28.70] 10 116 ms 116 ms 131 ms 216.200.6.237.theplanet.com [216.200.6.237] 11 120 ms 113 ms 116 ms vl31.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.30] 12 117 ms 116 ms 131 ms vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91] 13 126 ms 115 ms 114 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69] 14 120 ms 132 ms 113 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete.

My 10Mb connection was constantly very fast it seemed, but today my sister came to stay for a few days away from university. she asked me if she could use the pc i told her that she could just use her lappy and not downlaod spyware on my machine, so i hooked it up via ethernet and off she went.... i couldnt help but do a quick speed test and to my amazement she had a constant test result of 9.4Mb...... my machine is now gettting slower..... obviosuly its not the connection because she can achiebve high speeds and my computer is just slow... the max i get is 5mb nothing faster... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 1131 Kbps about 1.13 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 138 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2006/08/15 - 11:53am Bottom Line:: 20X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 7.42 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 151.954 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 36.52 % of your hosts average (co.uk) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-HY6SK70QV User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!] thats a constant.... what can i do on my computer to speed things us browsing and when downloading.... 1. What OS are you running? Windows XP SP2 installed fix still no difference. 2. Who your Internet Service Provider (ISP) is, and what the advertised speed for download/upload is. isp Blueyonder Cable 10Mb Down 356Up 3. What tweaking programs you already have installed, and run this test. Copy all text and paste it in your post! For security reasons, blank out your IP #. TCP options string = 0204058601010402 MTU = 1454 MTU sometimes used in PPPoA applications. If not, consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput. If you are using a router, it could be limiting your MTU regardless of Registry settings. MSS = 1414 Maximum useful data in each packet = 1414, which equals MSS. Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65535 RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 65535 Note: TCP 1323 Options need to be enabled for RWIN over 2^16 (65535). Windows 9x might also need the MS Vtcp386 fix. For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS. Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 520352 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 260176 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 4) 130088 (MSS x 46 * scale factor of 2) 65044 (MSS x 46) bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test): Your TCP Window limits you to: 2621.4 kbps (327.675 KBytes/s) @ 200ms Your TCP Window limits you to: 1048.56 kbps (131.07 KBytes/s) @ 500ms MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON Time to live left = 121 hops TTL value is ok. Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000 (0) 4. TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.3.3d click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 360.44Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 1.69Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem click START to re-test WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 827 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 9898 CongAvoid: 499 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 739 CurCwnd: 31108 CurMSS: 1414 CurRTO: 410 CurRwinRcvd: 65535 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 25452 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 2171904 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 1536 DupAcksIn: 85 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 66458 MaxMSS: 1414 MaxRTO: 510 MaxRTT: 330 MaxRwinRcvd: 65535 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 32522 MinMSS: 1414 MinRTO: 390 MinRTT: 160 MinRwinRcvd: 65535 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 827 PktsOut: 1536 PktsRetrans: 7 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 90 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 74 SampleRTT: 170 SmoothedRTT: 180 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 1417422 SndLimTimeCwnd: 8731901 SndLimTimeSender: 3671 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 2 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 439754 SndLimBytesCwnd: 1732150 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 131800 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 543572 Duration: 10155706 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 1.68 loss: 0.001302083 avgrtt: 178.35 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.1028 rwintime: 0.1396 sendtime: 0.0004 cwndtime: 0.8600 rwin: 0.5000 swin: 0.7891 cwin: 0.5070 rttsec: 0.178349 Sndbuf: 103424 aspd: 4.94492 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.36<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.13>.9], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [1.30>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.86>.6], (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [32522>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.36<9.5] (loss < .01) [0.00<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [4.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [1.68>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.13>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/2=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [4.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.13>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.86>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [32522>0] estimate = 1.68 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 178.35msec, and loss = 0.001302083 The theoretical network limit is 1.68 Mbps The NDT server has a 101.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.42 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 2.80 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 2.84 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' 5. done this 6. thats fine 7. all ok, just updated drivers 8. done that 9. yep tried that too. 10. dont use zonealarm 11. i use standard antivirus and firewall provided by isp. 12. scan and everyting is ok. 13. widnows updates are all uptodate now! 14. wow! great tool, had it for ages and use it frequently 15. whih should i use. 16. dunno what to do here simile

p0rnrh3tt Welcome to the forum, well try As VanBuren says try a bigger file because when you use a small one all the connection does is starts and seconds later it stops it dosent have enought time to reach its peak/maximum speed using a large file will max it out and hopefully give you an accurate test.

Wow, you got a way to go to fill all 2gigs up lol ..... Lets Get Spamming.. pmsl

This is my connection 10Mb with NTL:Telewest........ can anyone in the uk top that..... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 9603 Kbps about 9.6 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1172 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2006/08/11 - 5:06am Bottom Line:: 167X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.87 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 17.891 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 209.77 % faster than the average for host (co.uk) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QKB4USAM7 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 9374 Kbps about 9.37 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1144 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2006/08/10 - 12:41am Bottom Line:: 163X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.9 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 18.328 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 201.9 % faster than the average for host (co.uk) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VEJA6XP28 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!] This is my speed and im from the UK. Seems that UK is catching up with America..... At the start of 2007 My Broadband Supplier is upgrading me to 25Mb from 10Mb as that will be the basic pack they will be doing. Btw im on NTL:Telewest aka Virgin. I pay

I used to be with BT - British Telecoms but they dont offer a mb anymore as all the customers have been moved to their stupid 8Mb speed which always gave me problems. I actually never saw 8Mb i only got max was 3.5Mb. So i moved to telewest Broadband and i am currently getting this :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 9374 Kbps about 9.37 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 1144 kB/s Tested From:: http://hem.bredband.net Test Time:: 2006/08/10 - 12:41am Bottom Line:: 163X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.9 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 18.328 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 201.9 % faster than the average for host (co.uk) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VEJA6XP28 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

When i try to do an upload using the mirror VanBuren whatever size i try i get a error message. Internal Server Error The page you requested could not be served. This could happen for a variety of reasons, including: A CGI script failed to produce any output. The server is incorrectly configured. The server encountered a critical error. There may be more information about this error in the server's error logs. If you have any queries about this error, please e-mail [email protected]. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Back to vanburen.1go.dk homepage -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Powered by Zeus Web Server ] shame as this is the only mirror i get a decent speed from, i must say the odnwload is spot on and perfect works fine just the upload.

WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 1199 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 7300 CongAvoid: 761 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 2 CountRTT: 1034 CurCwnd: 61320 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 400 CurRwinRcvd: 150380 CurRwinSent: 16304 CurSsthresh: 42340 DSACKDups: 0 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 3190100 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 2185 DupAcksIn: 161 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 2 MaxCwnd: 151840 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 520 MaxRTT: 340 MaxRwinRcvd: 150380 MaxRwinSent: 16304 MaxSsthresh: 75920 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 400 MinRTT: 160 MinRwinRcvd: 37595 MinRwinSent: 16304 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 1199 PktsOut: 2185 PktsRetrans: 5 X_Rcvbuf: 103424 RcvWinScale: 7 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 166 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 153 SampleRTT: 190 SmoothedRTT: 170 X_Sndbuf: 103424 SndWinScale: 2 SndLimTimeRwin: 576421 SndLimTimeCwnd: 9478469 SndLimTimeSender: 2852 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 2 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 334340 SndLimBytesCwnd: 2855760 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 185390 Timeouts: 0 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2 WinScaleSent: 7 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 599967 Duration: 10060588 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 9 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 2.05 loss: 0.000915332 avgrtt: 179.29 waitsec: 0.00 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.1343 rwintime: 0.0573 sendtime: 0.0003 cwndtime: 0.9424 rwin: 1.1473 swin: 64.0000 cwin: 1.1584 rttsec: 0.179294 Sndbuf: 8388608 aspd: 7.33487 Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed < 5) [0.35<5] (rwintime > .9) [0.05>.9], (loss < .01) [9.15<.01] Checking for excessive errors condition (loss/sec > .15) [9.15>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.94>.6], (loss < .01) [9.15<.01], (MaxSsthresh > 0) [75920>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed < 9.5) [0<9.5], (speed > 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed < 9.5) [0.35<9.5] (loss < .01) [9.15<.01], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed < 5) [0<5] (Estimate > 50 [2.05>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.05>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/2=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed < 2) [0<2], (SndLimTransSender = 0) [1=0] (SendTime = 0) [3.0E-4=0], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.05>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink <= 10) [3.0<=10] Checking for congestion (cwndtime > .02) [0.94>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [75920>0] estimate = 2.05 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 179.29msec, and loss = 9.15332E-4 The theoretical network limit is 2.05 Mbps The NDT server has a 8192.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 356.95 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 146.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 6.39 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 6.46 Mbps Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is '10 Gig', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet' This is what i got on http://nitro.ucsc.edu/

as you can see from my sig that is the speed i can achieve but just cant hit it.... why??

Well only on thursday i joined Telewest Cable / Blueyonder and even though their service is more reliable its not really as fast as it says im sure it will take some tweaking but this cableut app to me is confusing and i dont know what setting to change. I am on a 10mb D/L 520 U/L I am connected to the modem directly via ethernet the modem is hokked to the net via a standard coxial cable. Speedtest from ; http://beta.speedtest.net/ 8/6/2006 12:00:13 PM PST 7043 kbps 354 kbps 134 ms London, UK 118 miles Speedtest From; Hispasoft Server Testmy.net :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 2716 Kbps about 2.72 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 332 kB/s Tested From:: http://speedtest.hispasoft.net Test Time:: 2006/08/06 - 12:06pm Bottom Line:: 47X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.08 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 63.25 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 87.33 % of your hosts average (co.uk) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GZP0HXDK1 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

8/5/2006 4:45:59 AM PST 9626 kbps 353 kbps 189 ms London, UK 118 miles This is a speed test that i did on that site. Im on a 10Mb Cable connection, seems england is catching up with america. lol

You have downloaded 7549 KB. Want to download more? but it dosent let me download anythink?? this RapidShare Sucks

is someone willing to email me the install file as the link posted dosent let me download apparently ip problems or somethink pm me for email addy!

From what i can see there seems to be more admins and mods than actual users lol. So cable how many actual admins and mods are there.

zoon internet never heard of it anyways what ya capped at

i personally am in afvour of what microsoft are doing, its not fair it takes $$$ to develop an os and people only go and download a hack or a crack for the os, its just like stealing from someones handbag/purse taking their owings.