VanBuren

:notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy: cool VanBuren

hey netmasta my guess is that its your default gateway router that has that limit like i said, that was a guess VanBuren

route seems fine atlas.cogentco.com all the way from amsterdam VanBuren

2nd test click START to re-test Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 8.28Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 7.82Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet click START to re-test

TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool v5.2.1e click START to begin Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 7.61Mb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 7.71Mb/s The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet click START to re-test

he changed the re-direction from 7000 to 6000 and applyed a 6 MB testfile, cos the 2992KB test is not accurate at speeds above 6 Mbps VanBuren

hey acidman and welcome to the forum follow these steps and post again https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=605.0 VanBuren

This topic has been moved to Make it Faster.... [iurl]https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=1732.0[/iurl]

fixed the link http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ VanBuren

heya flywhiteguy your RWIN is in range for a 3 Mbps connection, i think you dropping packets beqause you was faster with a lower RWIN, however the loss is there and that makes it impossible to reach cap. also test speed here copy the text result and paste it here http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ and make a new tweaktest and post link VanBuren

hey Worlddrknss and welcome to the forum download and install cablenut 4.08 https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1013.0;id=64 download the attached settings.zip file unzip it to C:ProgramCablenut open cablenut adjuster, in top left corner, click file, click load custom settings file, browse to C:ProgramCablenut and dubbleclick on 1500 384.ccs file now you have some values set in adjuster, click save to registry and reboot make some speedtests and one tweaktest post result here i also attached a 1000 384.ccs file, try that if you cant see any improvment ith the 1500 384 file good luck VanBuren

good ones VanBuren

:oops: :oops: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 236 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 29 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 4 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 35.31 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=C5WHX2O39 [move]do you feel the speed? [/move] VanBuren

too bad well good luck, also try google VanBuren

hey Martha i got bad news, i dont know anything about mac tweaking, and there is not many that does i found this program, try it out and report back how it worked for you http://www.sustworks.com/site/prod_ottuner.html VanBuren

No need for 2 threads about the same thing thread is closed VanBuren

hey man_military and welcome to the forum follow this link, and check the steps, post a tracert here and also a tweaktest https://testmy.net/forum/index.php?topic=605.msg4621#msg4621 VanBuren

hehe i have no idea what kinda power they have under the hood, but they are dern fast probl expensive too VanBuren

yea only some routes is affected, and it happens to be one of mine VanBuren

i moved the score here, cos you posted this in DW forum VanBuren

hey David also check speed here http://www.testmy.net/d_load.php?ta=1&top=mirror1&pop=1&ni=1'>http://www.testmy.net/d_load.php?ta=1&top=mirror1&pop=1&ni=1 this server has routing issues during peakhours i use to get 3.7 Mbps and now with 247 users :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 225 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 27 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 4 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 37.93 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=Q0K5J8D3Z this is what i get on link above at the very same time :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3062 Kbps about 3.1 Mbps (tested with 3151 KB) Download Speed is:: 374 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 55 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.74 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=GSMHNT97P VanBuren

its probl very expensive hehe http://www.tpd.tno.nl/smartsite592.html quote "Technical details Below are some facts and figures about the gigapixel image: * Final image dimensions: 78.797 x 31.565 pixels * Number of pixels in final image: 2,487,227,305 (2.5 gigapixel) * Final image file format: 24-bit colour bitmap * Final image file size: 7.5 GBytes * Number of source images: 600 * Number of pixels in source images: 3,537,408,000 (600 images * 3008*1960) * Lens focal length: 400 mm (equivalent to 600 mm on a 35 mm camera) * Aperture: F22, Shutter speed: 1/100, ISO: 125 * Horizontal field of view of final image: 93 degrees * Time required to capture component images: 1 hour and 12 minutes * Time required to match overlapping images: 20 hours * Time required to optimise project: 4 hours * Time required to compose the image: 3 full days using 5 high-end pcs * Time required to blend seams / correct misalignments / finalise image: 2 days" VanBuren

this is some skilled RC drivers in a movie ! http://www.enfreaks.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1105102672&archive=&start_from=&ucat=1 VanBuren

"TNO has produced the largest digital panoramic photo in the world. So, what do we mean by large? After all, modern consumer cameras can easily take a picture with 5 million pixels. Well, we are talking about a photo of completely different dimensions. One with 2.5 billion pixels - that's 500 times more pixels. If this photo were printed, it would measure 6.67 m by 2.67 m (300 dpi). The photograph shows Delft and its surroundings in the autumn of 2004. It was taken from the top of the Electrical Engineering faculty of Delft University, at a height of about 100 m, by TNO." http://www.fz.se/wtf/view.php?linkid=1249 that some quality image VanBuren

"THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal. Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says. Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight. The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organisation that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons. Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued." http://www.fz.se/wtf/view.php?linkid=1259 :lol: VanBuren