bryanlautt

oh now days with the faster processors you wont notice say like from an single core to even a dual core or quad core. but yeah if your running like say a AMD 700 running win xp then yeah your going to notice a big difference with loadding pages and so forth that are graphic intensive.

Funny since cable DOCSIS 2.0 isnt even able to go to 45 let alone 100mb. DOCSIS Downstream Upstream 1.x 42.88 (38) Mbit/s 10.24 (9) Mbit/s Euro 57.20 (51) Mbit/s 10.24 (9) Mbit/s 2.0 42.88 (38) Mbit/s 30.72 (27) Mbit/s 3.0 +480 Mbit/s +120 Mbit/s All though it would be nice have the 3.0 but it was just released in 2006 and i doubt that HSC companies will speed the money to upgrade.

Decided to run a test around noon today :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 14042 Kbps about 14 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1714 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/07 - 9:43am Bottom Line:: 245X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.6 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 7.094 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 155.59 % faster than the average for host (midco.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GSLEM6QV1 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

Those speeds are not cached, just thought i would let you know, your not speaking to a newbie in computer systems here lol like alot of people here are probably not even in there 20's yet lol

I never used Direcway actually i dont even use dish network anymore either since anytime it rains really bad or storms, the crap goes out, not with my Cable company though . I was paying over 100 a month just for sat tv. with my cable company i have DVR, HSC and unlimited phone calling all for around 140 a month. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 19616 Kbps about 19.6 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 2395 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/08/07 - 3:23am Bottom Line:: 342X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.43 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 5.078 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 257.04 % faster than the average for host (midco.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-5T0FR78XJ User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

I all boils down to weather your on Cable or DSL or Sat, all major Networks are all shared so thats why its seems to be proven that there are less people up at night surfing and downloading then they are during the day. I always get alot better speeds at off peek hours.

My speeds are Unrestricted/768, bascially theres no cap on my modem, the midco max package has the no back, but there lower package is capped at 10mb/512k I average around 18 to 20Mb down, i think that its do to that fact that my upload is capped at 768.

I asked my ISP why our upload cant be at least 1 MB or better and they said that it all depends on what the depand is in your area basically saying that there not going up faster then the next guy in the town all though after people have been asking for faster uploads they just bumped my upload from 512 to 768 and also i have noticed faster downloads now, so that tells me the faster your upload is the better throughput you can acheive on the downside.

Well thats cool, :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 15888 Kbps about 15.9 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB) Download Speed is:: 1939 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/07/30 - 7:27am Bottom Line:: 277X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.53 sec Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 25.078 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 192.22 % faster than the average for host (midco.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-ZLY6XO72P User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

How did u fix that

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 14530 Kbps about 14.5 Mbps (tested with 48638 kB) Download Speed is:: 1774 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/07/28 - 4:28am Bottom Line:: 253X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.58 sec Tested from a 48638 kB file and took 27.422 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 167.93 % faster than the average for host (midco.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JF7CA08YQ User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) [!]

Oh wow you are a bunch of young puppies, my b-day is the 7th

yeah well mines so fast that this is what i got: Sorry, your score of 10737628 Kbps is over TestMy.net's max of 60000 Kbps. It is very doubtful your connection is faster than 60000 Kbps

Yeah i highly doubt that is a accruate reading considering Charters Cap is 10MB down is the fastest package.

you whish you could really go that fast with direcpc lol thats what you call a cached speed

You must have one computer hooked up to the internet then have the other computers connected to the hub and then routed to use you main system to access the net??

you dont like the security features of a router?? Routers do alot better routing traffic then a Hub.

Your not alone Chris Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.20.0.1 3 8 ms 11 ms 8 ms host-141-5-220-24.midco.net [24.220.5.141] 4 14 ms 12 ms 12 ms gig-bb-midconet.midco.net [24.220.1.1] 5 17 ms 19 ms 14 ms gsr-west.midco.net [24.220.1.85] 6 55 ms 47 ms 47 ms sl-gw13-che-4-3.sprintlink.net [144.232.136.61] 7 38 ms 36 ms 36 ms sl-bb20-che-3-3.sprintlink.net [144.232.15.157] 8 111 ms 59 ms 58 ms sl-bb24-chi-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.160] 9 59 ms 59 ms 59 ms sl-bb23-chi-14-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.102] 10 56 ms 57 ms 56 ms sl-bb20-chi-8-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.53] 11 57 ms 60 ms 57 ms sl-st20-chi-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.3] 12 54 ms 55 ms 56 ms 144.232.8.114 13 86 ms 53 ms 54 ms ae-31-55.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.158] 14 89 ms 89 ms 90 ms ae-3.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.61] 15 100 ms 89 ms 89 ms ae-1-100.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.37] 16 92 ms 91 ms 91 ms ae-2.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.132.106] 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 80 ms 85 ms 80 ms THE-PLANET.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.71.122.2] 19 87 ms 82 ms 81 ms te9-2.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.30] 20 79 ms 80 ms 78 ms 4a.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com [70.87.253.74] 21 80 ms 107 ms 78 ms gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.6 9] 22 81 ms 79 ms 78 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. One thing that i am always wondering why some people dont have a second hop that stays the same like mine all time.

Not going through a router i see for you home connection??

Talk about being close to googles servers

Tracing route to google.com [64.233.167.99] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 10 ms 8 ms 7 ms 10.20.0.1 3 11 ms 13 ms 8 ms host-141-5-220-24.midco.net [24.220.5.141] 4 16 ms 12 ms 13 ms gig-bb-midconet.midco.net [24.220.1.1] 5 16 ms 14 ms 15 ms gsr.east.ifg2-2.midco.net [24.220.1.89] 6 26 ms 29 ms 26 ms sl-gw10-che-7-0.sprintlink.net [144.224.13.37] 7 26 ms 27 ms 27 ms sl-bb20-che-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.15.145] 8 49 ms 51 ms 48 ms sl-bb24-chi-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.160] 9 50 ms 48 ms 49 ms sl-bb23-chi-14-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.102] 10 46 ms 46 ms 47 ms sl-bb20-chi-8-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.53] 11 48 ms 46 ms 46 ms sl-st20-chi-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.3] 12 53 ms 51 ms 52 ms 144.228.52.50 13 58 ms 50 ms 51 ms 216.239.48.154 14 50 ms 48 ms 48 ms 66.249.94.133 15 54 ms 62 ms 61 ms 72.14.232.74 16 48 ms 49 ms 48 ms py-in-f99.google.com [64.233.167.99] Trace complete.

I love my AC

Back when i was in colledge we has mighty Pentiums 133 and 150 and windows 95 who and when you typed in a website you could make a pot of coffee and get back just in time for the page to get loaded up lol boy how times have changed in those few years.

You know hmmmmmm never tried putting an os on a Flash drive lol i mean i know you can boot with a flash drive but i am doubtfull that it will work but you never know just plug the sucker in and put your windows disk in and see if the OS will see the flash drive as a destination source.

Let me give you some advise, whatever you buy for around 800 dollars will be obsolete the next day. I would stay away from ebay when it comes with computers but thats just my opinion, you can never be sure if you buying someone elses junk. Your not going to get 2gig of ram and 120 gig hard and especially and 17inch lcd screen for less then 800 dollars. Just isnt going to happen.