powerspec88

Here it is here at work. Tracing route to 75.125.181.200 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-dc3-core-6509-1.netisinc.com [10.1.129.4] 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-bdr-rtr-02.netisinc.com [65.208.228.3] 3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-bdr-rtr-01.netisinc.com [65.208.228.2] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 12.88.17.157 5 15 ms 15 ms 14 ms tbr2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.112.78] 6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms tbr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.45] 7 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms ggr6.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.88.13] 8 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms 192.205.35.78 9 14 ms 35 ms 14 ms xe-0-3-0.r21.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250 .3.221] 10 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms p64-2-2-0.r21.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.25 0.2.22] 11 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms ae-0.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.5 8] 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms xe-4-1.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2 .229] 14 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms ge-1.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.10. 70] 15 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net [207.218.22 3.126] 16 30 ms 33 ms 32 ms 75.125.181.200 Trace complete. Tracing route to aa.e2.364a.static.theplanet.com [74.54.226.170] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-dc3-core-6509-1.netisinc.com [10.1.129.4] 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-bdr-rtr-02.netisinc.com [65.208.228.3] 3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-bdr-rtr-01.netisinc.com [65.208.228.2] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 12.88.17.157 5 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms tbr2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.112.78] 6 22 ms 22 ms 22 ms tbr1.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.9.141] 7 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms tbr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90] 8 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms 12.122.100.97 9 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms 12.87.41.150 10 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms te7-2.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.10] 11 17 ms 18 ms 17 ms 7e.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com [70.87.253.126] 12 245 ms 242 ms 240 ms po1.car06.dllstx6.theplanet.com [12.96.160.8] 13 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms aa.e2.364a.static.theplanet.com [74.54.226.170] Trace complete. And on my DSL line. Tracing route to 75.125.181.200 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms ppp-70-246-239-254.dsl.ksc2mo.swbell.net [70.246 .239.254] 3 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 67.64.49.66 4 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms bb2-tg3-0.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net [151.164.40.233] 5 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms ex1-p14-1.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.242.41] 6 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms 151.164.249.222 7 18 ms 19 ms 19 ms pr2-ge-0-1-1.dallasequinix.savvis.net [204.70.19 4.21] 8 995 ms 199 ms 70 ms cr1-tengig0-7-5-0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.200. 170] 9 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms bcr1-so0-0-0.dallas.savvis.net [204.70.193.9] 10 26 ms 27 ms 26 ms iar1-so-2-0-0.Houston.savvis.net [208.172.129.21 ] 11 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms 208.172.129.2 12 39 ms 26 ms 26 ms ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net [207.218.22 3.126] 13 26 ms 26 ms 27 ms 75.125.181.200 Trace complete. Tracing route to aa.e2.364a.static.theplanet.com [74.54.226.170] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms ppp-70-246-239-254.dsl.ksc2mo.swbell.net [70.246 .239.254] 3 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms 67.64.49.1 4 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms bb1-tg3-0.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net [151.164.40.85] 5 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms 151.164.95.188 6 21 ms 20 ms 21 ms 151.164.251.162 7 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms te7-1-10G.ar2.DAL2.gblx.net [67.16.129.117] 8 20 ms 21 ms 21 ms The-Planet.GigabitEthernet7-3.ar2.DAL2.gblx.net [64.208.170.198] 9 21 ms 22 ms 21 ms te9-2.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.30] 10 21 ms 21 ms 20 ms 76.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com [70.87.253.118] 11 39 ms 21 ms 20 ms po1.car06.dllstx6.theplanet.com [12.96.160.8] 12 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms aa.e2.364a.static.theplanet.com [74.54.226.170] Trace complete. Both lines show the new server is much better routeing/ping times from kansas city.

I only have access to my Sprint wireless connection atm, but i will do a tracert to each ip. I will get tracert/ping times from my at&t dsl line and my works 400Mbps link with at&t tonight and see how much better they are. C:UsersAdmin>tracert 75.125.181.200 Tracing route to 75.125.181.200 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 9 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 93 ms 89 ms 84 ms 68.28.81.69 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 96 ms 110 ms 107 ms 68.28.83.55 5 106 ms 239 ms 84 ms 68.28.83.7 6 81 ms 97 ms 86 ms 68.28.84.66 7 102 ms 115 ms 130 ms 68.28.83.18 8 93 ms 134 ms 88 ms sl-gw16-kc-3-3.sprintlink.net [160.81.161.237] 9 91 ms 83 ms 116 ms sl-bb20-kc-8-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.23.53] 10 147 ms 93 ms 99 ms sl-crs1-fw-0-4-0-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.56 ] 11 126 ms 108 ms 116 ms sl-crs2-fw-0-14-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.4 7] 12 112 ms 109 ms 114 ms sl-st21-dal-12-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.194 ] 13 104 ms 129 ms 132 ms sl-timewarner-174329-0.sprintlink.net [144.228.1 33.222] 14 106 ms 106 ms 107 ms 216-54-253-2.ev1.net.demarc [216.54.253.2] 15 160 ms 128 ms 107 ms 216-54-253-2.ev1.net.demarc [216.54.253.2] 16 115 ms 143 ms 114 ms ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net [207.218.22 3.126] 17 118 ms 115 ms 126 ms 75.125.181.200 Trace complete. C:UsersAdmin>tracert 74.54.226.170 Tracing route to aa.e2.364a.static.theplanet.com [74.54.226.170] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 8 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 241 ms 101 ms 107 ms 68.28.81.69 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 119 ms 80 ms 78 ms 68.28.83.54 5 114 ms 114 ms 118 ms 68.28.83.7 6 107 ms 91 ms 148 ms 68.28.84.66 7 111 ms 106 ms 102 ms 68.28.83.18 8 109 ms 121 ms 82 ms sl-gw16-kc-3-3.sprintlink.net [160.81.161.237] 9 109 ms 112 ms 100 ms sl-bb20-kc-8-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.23.53] 10 143 ms 130 ms 128 ms sl-bb25-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.4] 11 121 ms 97 ms 98 ms sl-bb25-fw-11-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.45] 12 114 ms 126 ms 105 ms 144.232.8.14 13 101 ms 98 ms 114 ms tbr1.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.2] 14 97 ms 107 ms 96 ms gar10.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.100.41] 15 96 ms 98 ms 97 ms 12.87.41.150 16 148 ms 104 ms 359 ms te9-2.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.30] 17 91 ms 111 ms 98 ms 7e.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com [70.87.253.126] 18 124 ms 142 ms 348 ms po1.car06.dllstx6.theplanet.com [12.96.160.8] 19 94 ms 99 ms 123 ms aa.e2.364a.static.theplanet.com [74.54.226.170] Trace complete.

Still below 10Mbps. Why? Because a lot of people will still be on DSL or under 10Mbps cable internet. People like me who can only get Sprints EVDO service or satellite internet.

Here it is on my ATT DSL line which has better routing than a ATT 400Mbps fiber line? C:UsersAdmin>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [75.125.181.200] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 9 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 70.230.247.254 3 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 67.64.49.66 4 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms bb2-tg3-0.ksc2mo.sbcglobal.net [151.164.40.233] 5 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms ex1-p12-0.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.40.29] 6 19 ms 20 ms 38 ms 151.164.251.150 7 20 ms 21 ms 20 ms dpr1-ge-6-0-1.dallasequinix.savvis.net [204.70.1 94.37] 8 31 ms 21 ms 21 ms cr2-tengige0-7-5-0.dallas.savvis.net [204.70.196 .29] 9 19 ms 19 ms 20 ms bcr2-so0-0-0.dallas.savvis.net [204.70.193.13] 10 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms iar1-so-0-0-0.Houston.savvis.net [208.172.131.78 ] 11 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms 208.172.129.2 12 29 ms 30 ms 36 ms ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net [207.218.22 3.126] 13 29 ms 30 ms 29 ms 75.125.181.200 Trace complete. C:UsersAdmin>ping testmy.net Pinging testmy.net [75.125.181.200] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 75.125.181.200: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 29ms

Pinging testmy.net [75.125.181.200] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=50 Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=50 Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=50 Reply from 75.125.181.200: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for 75.125.181.200: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 33ms Tracing route to testmy.net [75.125.181.200] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-dc3-core-6509-1.netisinc.com [10.1.129.4] 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-bdr-rtr-02.netisinc.com [65.208.228.3] 3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-bdr-rtr-01.netisinc.com [65.208.228.2] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 12.88.17.157 5 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms tbr2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.112.78] 6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms cr2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.18.77] 7 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms cr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.21] 8 14 ms 15 ms 15 ms tbr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.17.206] 9 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms ggr6.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.88.13] 10 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms 192.205.35.78 11 15 ms 13 ms 13 ms xe-0-3-0.r21.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250 .3.221] 12 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms p64-2-2-0.r21.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.25 0.2.22] 13 29 ms 25 ms 34 ms ae-0.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.5 8] 14 * 32 ms 35 ms as-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.1 30] 15 83 ms 215 ms 208 ms xe-4-1.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2 .229] 16 41 ms 40 ms 38 ms ge-1.ev1.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.10. 70] 17 31 ms 33 ms 33 ms ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net [207.218.22 3.126] 18 30 ms 30 ms 35 ms 75.125.181.200 Trace complete. Could be alot better if it didn't go to chicago first then to dallas.... AT&T's routing can be bad sometimes.

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 22768 Kbps about 22.8 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 2779 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/02/25 - 1:29am Bottom Line:: 397X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.37 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 4.375 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 426.18 % faster than the average for host (228.110) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9LS13MKXN User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 3016 Kbps about 3 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 368 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2008/02/25 - 1:30am Bottom Line:: 53X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 2.78 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 16.249 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 231.43 % faster than the average for host (228.110) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-7PE129SQY User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) [!] This is what im getting at work with about 20Mbps down and 10Mbps up of traffic going atm.

Speeds are slow for me. but it could be that i about 500miles away from the server to and the route it takes is not the best. ::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..:::::::::: Download Connection is:: 19559 Kbps about 19.56 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 2388 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 3417 Kbps about 3.4 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 417 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2008/02/22 - 12:28am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/idual testNL9JUOMP U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1SYQVEI7N User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2) Tracing route to testmy.net [75.125.181.200] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-dc3-core-6509-1.netisinc.com [10.1.129.4] 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nis-bdr-rtr-02.netisinc.com [65.208.228.3] 3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 64-126-31-113.static.everestkc.net [64.126.31.11 3] 4 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 126-0-253.ksle.everestkc.net [64.126.0.253] 5 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 126-0-65.ksle.everestkc.net [64.126.0.65] 6 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms gi1-13.mpd01.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [38.104.86 .1] 7 16 ms 22 ms 16 ms te3-2.mpd01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.5.2 17] 8 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms gi2-0-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54. 2.241] 9 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms everyonesinternet.demarc.cogentco.com [38.112.12 .178] 10 17 ms 17 ms 16 ms ivhou-207-218-223-126.ev1servers.net [207.218.22 3.126] 11 19 ms 19 ms 17 ms 75.125.181.200 Trace complete.

I can't get the test to work at all. This is on a fresh install of linux. :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 36635 Kbps about 36.64 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 4472 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 305 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 37 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Main) Test Time:: 2007/11/08 - 11:50am D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1NHVXDKWF U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JLOV5YKIA User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1. Gecko/20071022 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.8 [!]

I've done some tweaking now. Upload speed is much better. :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 330 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 kB) Upload Speed is:: 40 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Main) Test Time:: 2007/10/25 - 12:23pm Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 25.6 sec Tested from a 579 kB file and took 14.368 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 41.03 % faster than the average for host (spcsdns.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-A6OT54RIE User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1. Gecko/20071008 Firefox/2.0.0.8 [!]

Im not saying speed, where it says Current Session Usage: the RX and TX values will never go above 2GB (or 2048MB)of useage. I just reset my router and i will see if it will do it again.

I finally got Sprints PCS here at my house! I got the Sierra Wireless-AirCard

ether way, i also don't use paypal also. but at lease it all worked out for you.

Very nice, and thats another reason why i don't use ebay...

Good price! I just went out and got 2 500GB external drives for 130$ each. If your on the move all the time like i am, they come in handy.

lol, i think it will be the september 26, the day i grad from college!