iced98lx

I enjoy the speeds, yes. Today has a little more traffic on my ISP's network than during the week, but it's still good speeds.... I just realized I've been on the phone the whole time, which is probably affecting it a bit (being VOIP and what not).. I can't wait until I get the internal network around here cleaned up and set up properly, I should probably see a twinge bit of an increase in throughput to individual machines. PS: your speeds are pretty good for residential too, what's your advertised package? (Maybe you should modify the original post to have people include their adv. speeds too?)

I don't have a maximum download speed from my ISP, it's unregulated.. so whatever I can pull with my equipment and their network traffic.

exsqueeze me? I don't understand your question. are you asking about my advertised speeds from my ISP?

Sure.. It didn't come out quite as well, but I'm downloading some updates on one of my servers.... Still not bad.

Well.. Their server didn't like my ability, I don't think.. I started right around my noraml 1600kB/sec but it eventually knocked me down to this: (Firefox doesn't give you an average at the end so I took multiple screenies during to prove average speed..) Sadness. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 15287 Kbps about 15.29 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1866 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/09/30 - 9:54am Bottom Line:: 267X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.55 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 6.516 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 158.53 % faster than the average for host (midco.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0LPM8IQ76 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]

Not bad, although both ways could use a boost according to what you could get... have you tweaked it out yet?

mine is because I drove a 1998 ford Escort LX for many years.. (ugly, ugly years)

Now it's much lower, but the scores pages jumped way up on the list, which is cool. It says in 122 days I will be at the top... excellent.

I laughed hard at the white and nerdy video... .then realized that was my high school experiance

I've got the opteron on a heathly OC, but it spends a lot of proc time doing actual work.. If I had a dualcore though, one could work and one could fold.. I can't wait until either later today or tomorrow night to see the newly added a64's start kicking in results.. Chris

Should have about 10 more A64 3500's online today... I'm going to get a dualcore for some testing though, I really like the output you're getting from yours RTB.. just three cores and all that production! </Jelous> Chris

I think I should be at the top of the 24 hour average production now.. it's time to see how high i can get it and climb the overall board.

Yea I was looking at the processors of the overall points leaders, not the highest in 24 hrs, my apologies for accusing you of having more than you do.

Well, that is slow.. Your connection is: 12191 Kbps or 12.19 Mbps You Downloaded at: 1488 kB/s You are running: 213 times faster than 56K and can Download 1 megabyte in 0.69 second(s) Member Ident:Username:Christopher CompID:221109756885 Test Time:: 2006/09/14 - 6:11am Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 Test ID: M1FORI8V5 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake) Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 105.58 % faster than the average for host (midco.net) This was tested from a 12160 kB file and took 8.171 seconds to complete that's about 5mbps slower than usual for me.. but I dont' ask questions.

ourthinktank... I'm still bringing things up to speed.. but soon I should be the highest pts per 24 hr period... You guys are both doing reallly well for the number of CPU's you have going though... I'm in 2nd with 8, RTB is winning with 6... I guess it's time to add a few more! I hope i didn't sound like tooo much of an ass in my first post, PS. Chris

2gb of ram on both desktops (2x1gb running dual channel), 1Gb on the laptop (2x512) and 4 gb on the server.. it's all ddr400 except the server, that's ddr2 533

so how pissed would you be if I passed you both... ?? This week is going to be a lot of fun...

Eh, I'll keep my 15-20mpbs cable, but it's good speeds for residential. Chris

it's probably just the usage on campus.. Here at the University of Sioux Falls the download test is usually 3-4 mbps slower than the upload.. It's a hazzard of a symetrical connection when download is used x2 as much. For instance we have ~8mbps both ways but right now (I'm looking at the packeteer front display) we're using 4 down and .8 up... Chris

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 19737 Kbps about 19.74 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 2409 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/07/18 - 3:16pm Bottom Line:: 344X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.43 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 5.047 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 239.65 % faster than the average for host (midco.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-XG1U3SJAI User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!] It's right up there to pretty stinkin fast downloads now.. yes, I want more upload too, but the next plan up is $195/month for 1.5mpbs up

$95/month but it includes 80 channels of TV too..

:::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 14489 Kbps about 14.49 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1769 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 747 Kbps about 0.75 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 91 kB/s Tested From:: http://testmy.net'>http://testmy.net (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/07/18 - 8:01am D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net'>http://testmy.net/stats/id-SF5Q30JVC U-Validation Link:: http://te Not my best upload today, saw a few in the 16's but overall I'm pretty happy for an out of the box no tweaks score. advertised speed: uncapped/768 Chris

This is tested over wireless network in my home... :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 643 Kbps about 0.6 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 78 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Mon Sep 05 2005 11:30:49 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 11X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 13.13 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 124.04 % faster than the average for host (227.212) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MIVDBWUG9 I'm feeling okay about these scores, despite not being as good as they will get.

Well after climbing up a tower and adjusting my antenne, and configuring my bridge right.. (at least they finally gave up and let me do it.. lol) I've finally got good connection (89% RSSI/98%Signal strength / 1% packet loss over 100 packets) and good speeds too!! :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 427 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Upload Speed is:: 52 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server2) Test Time:: Tue Aug 16 2005 22:23:41 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 8X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 19.69 sec Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 168.55 % faster than the average for host (227.212) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-VY9CWRX3E :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 271 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 1013 kB) Download Speed is:: 33 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (server1) Test Time:: Tue Aug 16 2005 22:26:43 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB download in 31.03 sec Diagnosis: May need help : running at only 77.21 % of your hosts average (227.212) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-Q5H3GMTSN Obviously not the 8mbps cable I had at the last place, but for advertised 256/256 it's doing pretty dern well!

yeah, like i said, we're getting a more powerful directional antenne in a week here, so I'm sure the dropping will fix up- the rest of the equipment is top of the line, good stuff so i'm not worried there, just wondering if there are any other WISP users who have ping times to compare.. I've noticed a heavy back-bone reliance.. for instance my website averages 394ms over 100 but testmy averages 120, both are bad enough to not be able to play my favorite games