VanBuren Posted December 19, 2004 CID Share Posted December 19, 2004 Test again, now i use a updated script ! VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 20, 2004 CID Share Posted December 20, 2004 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:Documents and Settings.s1>tracert thegamer.serveftp.com Tracing route to thegamer.serveftp.com [213.115.113.240] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.102.192.1 2 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms atm5-0-644.tampflerl-rtr1.tampabay.rr.com [24.92 .7.42] 3 12 ms 9 ms 11 ms srp8-0.tampflerl-rtr3.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.8.2 27] 4 11 ms 10 ms 9 ms pop1-tby-P0-1.atdn.net [66.185.136.169] 5 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms bb1-tby-P0-0.atdn.net [66.185.136.160] 6 27 ms 27 ms 27 ms bb2-atm-P7-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.245] 7 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms bb2-cha-P6-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.31] 8 47 ms 45 ms 44 ms bb2-ash-P13-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.50] 9 43 ms 43 ms 49 ms pop3-ash-P1-0.atdn.net [66.185.148.211] 10 43 ms 45 ms 44 ms GlobalCrossing.atdn.net [66.185.136.10] 11 156 ms 155 ms 161 ms so6-0-0-2488M.ar1.ARN1.gblx.net [67.17.67.250] 12 156 ms 155 ms 154 ms 64.215.185.82 13 161 ms 160 ms 160 ms pos11-0.cr2.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.249 ] 14 168 ms 161 ms 161 ms pos14-0.cr1.sto1.se.bredband.com [195.54.123.129 ] 15 163 ms 163 ms 162 ms pos12-0.cr2.ore1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.42] 16 179 ms 181 ms 179 ms pos5-0.cr2.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.124.70] 17 175 ms 177 ms 178 ms vlan2.dr1.ume11.se.bredband.com [195.54.118.125] 18 181 ms 181 ms 181 ms vlan11.dr1.lul1.se.bredband.com [195.54.115.230] 19 180 ms 182 ms 182 ms vlan3.dr2.lul10.se.bredband.com [195.54.119.234] 20 * * * Request timed out. 21 * * * Request timed out. 22 * * * Request timed out. 23 * * * Request timed out. 24 * * * Request timed out. 25 * * * Request timed out. 26 * * * Request timed out. 27 * * * Request timed out. 28 * * * Request timed out. 29 * * * Request timed out. 30 * * meh i think i have another route lol total 29 hops cant remember it use to be 29 hops, well maybe the routing changed... do you get same speed from my server as before? VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted December 20, 2004 CID Share Posted December 20, 2004 VanBuren: I think it's 20 hops total, your server is just confusing the tracert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 20, 2004 CID Share Posted December 20, 2004 VanBuren: I think it's 20 hops total' date=' your server is just confusing the tracert.[/quote'] huh? How can my server confuse the tracert? VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xs1 Posted December 20, 2004 Author CID Share Posted December 20, 2004 uhh... :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 314 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 2304 KB) Download Speed is:: 38 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 6 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 26.95 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=2W4EH7PO6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTB Posted December 20, 2004 CID Share Posted December 20, 2004 Why are there so many hops that timed out then? Because you block certain packets the tracert might not know when to stop and packets get lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 20, 2004 CID Share Posted December 20, 2004 As you can see in the trace i did against .s1 (thehubness) not a single node timed out. some of the nodes including my own pc and gateway, block showing dns name but thats another thing. If you refering to .s1 tracert against my pc, your correct, i block all ICMP traffic and thats why it shows as packetloss. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkieXL Posted December 26, 2004 CID Share Posted December 26, 2004 this new XP is quite stubborn...almost like hitting a bull in the ass with a banjo... Time to Tweak ~!~!~! -JxL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkieXL Posted December 26, 2004 CID Share Posted December 26, 2004 9 registry tweaks produced these stats: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 7060 Kbps about 7.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 862 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 126 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.19 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=EUX5KQIAD :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 247 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is: 30 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 4 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 34.13 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=YNQS39N1A -JxL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted December 26, 2004 CID Share Posted December 26, 2004 9 registry tweaks produced these stats: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 7060 Kbps about 7.1 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 862 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 126 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.19 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=EUX5KQIAD :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is: 247 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 KB) Upload Speed is: 30 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line: 4 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 34.13 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=YNQS39N1A -JxL Very nice download speed, but you should be able to get better upload do you mind sharing what registry tweaks you use? There are a few ways to boost upload aswell, Defult Send window in Cablenut, VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.