mrcrash Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 Computer #1 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 6879 Kbps about 6.88 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 840 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 1869 Kbps about 1.87 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 228 kB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/06/06 - 11:28pm D-Validation Link:: http://www.testmy.net/stats/id-50MJL6KT8 U-Validation Link:: http://www.testmy.net/stats/id-F2T176XPR User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) will post computer # 2 now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcrash Posted June 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 :::.. testmy.net test results ..::: Download Connection is:: 11405 Kbps about 11.41 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1392 kB/s Upload Connection is:: 857 Kbps about 0.86 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB) Upload Speed is:: 105 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/06/06 - 11:32pm D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PL5OA7FDB U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-1MPZXG76L User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) the slow one has a on board 3com card and this one has a linksys car. on board should not make that much of a diff .... right?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 please post the stats for both computers .. let us know the CPU speed, how much memory, what OS, and let us know what speed your provider says you are supposed to get... also are you running any proxies or firewalls on either of the machines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 welcome to the site by the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcrash Posted June 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 welcome to the site by the way ty 12/2 FIOS Computer #2 Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 1 (2600.xpsp2.030422-1633) Processor: Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 1500MHz Memory: 768MB RAM No FW or antivirus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcrash Posted June 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 Computer #1 Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2 (2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519) Processor: Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2 CPUs) Memory: 1022MB RAM No FW or antivirus both are pluged into the same HUB that Hub plugs into DI-604 and i swaped the ports on the hub with no effect. Should i try the cable? sorry for the double posting but i am to lazy to type all that out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcrash Posted June 7, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 do i need more info? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted June 7, 2006 CID Share Posted June 7, 2006 the slow one has a on board 3com card and this one has a linksys car. on board should not make that much of a diff .... right?? it make a huge difference, make sure that you have the latest drivers for your network card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcrash Posted June 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 8, 2006 Thanks, i check that. Can on board lan be bad like on board video? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amc11890 Posted June 8, 2006 CID Share Posted June 8, 2006 Thanks, i check that. Can on board lan be bad like on board video? no onbard lan are fine unless your particular ilan is deffective. Like dlewis said make sure you have the latest drivers installed. Onboard video is not that bad unless you are a gamer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
php Posted June 8, 2006 CID Share Posted June 8, 2006 Onboard LAN is actually better in many cases, because it's directly attached to the Southbridge if I recall correctly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlewis23 Posted June 8, 2006 CID Share Posted June 8, 2006 Onboard LAN is actually better in many cases, because it's directly attached to the Southbridge if I recall correctly. you would be correct, it is directly attached to the southbridge, and has direct communication to the the north bridge and the CPU. mrcrash you need to also make sure you have the latest chipset drivers as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcrash Posted June 8, 2006 Author CID Share Posted June 8, 2006 ok i did not check my chip set drivers, great tip i never would have thought to update that. i will up date and then repost with my results. just make sure were on the same page. i did make sure i have current drivers for my nic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.