Odysseus_____ Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 I wish I had that connection in my House. Heh.... me too man... me too... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Its funny how the speakeasy tests have u at between 2-11Mbps and the others at way above 10-20Mbps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odysseus_____ Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Yeah.. I've noticed a few things... some speakeasy tests have my d/load really low and my u/load really high... then some are more evened out... I think of all of the speakeasy tests, the atlanta one is the closest to what I observe when using the connection.... When d/loading I typically am around 10-15 Mbps... sometimes better depending on the server... and on upload my ftp can support between 5-7 megabits mostly (more when multiple users are connected sometimes)... sometimes more or less but usually about there... I think the reason the atlanta one is somewhat accurate is because most of the time my first hop out of the building is a Global Crossing backbone in Atlanta, which could be the one Speakeasy uses... dunno for sure..... Or, sometimes it's one of Qwest's backbones... depending on the address I am going to.... ++++Edit: Nope, nevermind.. it goes through the qwest server to get to the atlanta speakeasy server... here's the traceroute.... Microsoft® Windows DOS ©Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001. C:WINDOWS>tracert atl.speakeasy.net Tracing route to atl.speakeasy.net [216.27.175.2] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 69.2.35.253 <=== router 2 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 69.2.32.67 <=== Provider (in the building) 3 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms iah-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [67.132.143.77] 4 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms iah-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.31.45] 5 13 ms 15 ms 13 ms dal-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.8.125] 6 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms dap-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.225.49] 7 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms 205.171.1.110 8 23 ms 22 ms 23 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.28.210] 9 35 ms 36 ms 36 ms so-2-0-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.29.10] 10 36 ms 34 ms 36 ms so-6-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.28.130] 11 36 ms 36 ms 36 ms so-0-0-0.mpr1.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.29.109] 12 36 ms 36 ms 36 ms so-3-0-0.mpr2.iad2.us.above.net [64.125.28.214] 13 36 ms 36 ms 36 ms so-3-0-0.mpr2.iad10.us.above.net [64.125.30.121] 14 36 ms 36 ms 38 ms 209.249.11.221.available.above.net [209.249.11.2 21] 15 51 ms 50 ms 50 ms 591.fe-2-0.er1.atl1.speakeasy.net [69.17.82.173] 16 50 ms 50 ms 49 ms dns.atl1.speakeasy.net [216.27.175.2] Trace complete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 So whats your final conclusion as to the most acurate test site Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odysseus_____ Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 I think this site, or maybe the atlanta speakeasy.... it's hard to say I guess.... I guess I shouldn't be picky... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Yea,true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 See,I really think downloading and uploading at the same time helps with speed tests,not too much but enough to keep the modem awake :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5230 Kbps about 5.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 638 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 93 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.61 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=W0XBGY7O1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5788 Kbps about 5.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 KB) Download Speed is:: 706 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 103 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.45 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=WGVE08UT4 Maybe............................................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Most recent one,about 45 sec. ago :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5500 Kbps about 5.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 671 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 98 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.53 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=XXX2GKJ04 After :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5626 Kbps about 5.6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 687 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 100 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.49 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=DI08Q2SIM After again :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5549 Kbps about 5.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 677 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 99 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.51 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=MVFEHW0GA so with my connection working abit and CA3LES server tweak,and Vanburen's tweaks,this is pretty nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Not much of a difference. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5798 Kbps about 5.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 KB) Download Speed is:: 708 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 104 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.45 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=D6GES5YW8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Not much of a difference. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5798 Kbps about 5.8 Mbps (tested with 5983 KB) Download Speed is:: 708 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 104 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.45 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=D6GES5YW8 Still a kick-ass connection in my books Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 A Couple of seconds ago. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5987 Kbps about 6 Mbps (tested with 5983 KB) Download Speed is:: 731 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 107 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.4 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=6G0MKUF1O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 A Couple of seconds ago. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 5987 Kbps about 6 Mbps (tested with 5983 KB) Download Speed is:: 731 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 107 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.4 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=6G0MKUF1O Much better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingzero2309 Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 downloaded m3, dont really see much of a difference WITH M3: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3052 Kbps about 3.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 373 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 54 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.75 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=AYO9XQU7G WITH REGULAR FIREFOX: :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 2982 Kbps about 3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 364 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 53 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.81 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=OMK9ANBD5 I'll just stick with regular FireFox , <100 kbps isnt really gonna make a difference for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Everything above 4mb is kick ass to me. I know. This one is my fastest download i gotten on the 5MB test. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6056 Kbps about 6.1 Mbps (tested with 5983 KB) Download Speed is:: 739 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 108 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.39 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=AXMINS1G2 Im so Speedy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 I never saw a difference either,except some weird bursts from 5000kbps to 6600kbps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Everything above 4mb is kick ass to me. I know. This one is my fastest download i gotten on the 5MB test. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6056 Kbps about 6.1 Mbps (tested with 5983 KB) Download Speed is:: 739 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 108 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.39 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=AXMINS1G2 Im so Speedy Very nice And yes we know your speedy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Thank You Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evildevil Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 6032 Kbps about 6 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Download Speed is:: 736 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 108 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.39 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=3BH6QRS9F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 :::.. Download Stats ..::: Connection is:: 13176 Kbps about 13.2 Mbps (tested with 12160 KB) Download Speed is:: 1608 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 235 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 0.64 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=RXWLZBO0A :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Connection is:: 3158 Kbps about 3.2 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB) Upload Speed is:: 385 KB/s Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/ Bottom Line:: 56 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 2.66 second(s) Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=84PGMVAXS Van, once again dood... your tweaks for cablenut are awesome.... thanks. very nice speeds Odysseus_____ I think you can fine tune even more, with the TCP WindowSize, PM me if you need some help, and setting up MSS so its multiple with RWIN. Cablenut is the greatest tool but since i dont have all types of connections at home its impossible to make all files perfect, but some of them are very close, some finetuning can be needed. VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mo3020 Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 HAHAAHAHAHAH MINE OWNES ALLL OF YALLS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 hey Mo3020 and welcome to the forum dern thats sweet speed what kinda connection do you have, and from where did you test? VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just- Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Van Mo3020 cheated he or she has rr 6Mbps Mo3020 we dont apreciate cheating/caching here we are ture lovers od speed true speed not fake stuff ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 Van Mo3020 cheated he or she has rr 6Mbps Mo3020 we dont apreciate cheating/caching here we are ture lovers od speed true speed not fake stuff ok Good catch just.... Mo3020 you didnt really think you could get away with that did ya??? there are way to many smart ppl here like just who caught. you, there is a way to do that but not like you did.....LOL Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanBuren Posted January 24, 2005 CID Share Posted January 24, 2005 that score is not from hes connection, it says user host 205.60......... in validation link it should have said rr.com if it was from his pc, even if it was cached my guess he tested from a office or school VanBuren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.