CA3LE Posted November 29, 2003 CID Share Posted November 29, 2003 I have renovated a bit.. not only looks wise but I also made one major change. When / if you score over what I think is acceptable for the test size you have chosen you will automatically be redirected to the next size up. This increases accuracy a whole lot ::: Download Stats ::: Connection is: 3911 kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 1544 KB) Download Speed is: 477 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2058666 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 70 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check_dn.cgi?num=2058666&kbps=3911&gen=gen So you don't get a burst score... you get a nice steady download score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 18, 2003 Author CID Share Posted December 18, 2003 People must really dig the new site design... (by the way... this post is more for me than it is for public... kind of a diary of events) Twice as many people have bookmarked the site since redesign 20% of people bookmarking Twice as many page views trending this month at 2.2 million page views 30% increase in visitors this month 30% increase in visits per visitor (2.2visits/visitor very nice) Visits duration :: Average: 7 minutes up from Average: 6.22 minutes (people are kickin' it here longer) and about 500% increase over last month in referers from forums (people are talking 'bout TMN) can't wait to see the traffic boom when i unveil my new addition to testmy!! I get all this friggen traffic... YET, I only have 500 posts to my forum that has been up a year! That is friggen pathetic! But Forums are extreamly hard to start! But once that snow ball gets big enough and starts growing too fast... ima need to get more mods Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoPE Posted December 18, 2003 CID Share Posted December 18, 2003 yeah i have to say the forum is kinda quiet, but overall the site is a good one im impressed keep up the good work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 18, 2003 Author CID Share Posted December 18, 2003 thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evildevil Posted December 20, 2003 CID Share Posted December 20, 2003 i almost beat your speed ::: Download Stats ::: Connection is: 3901 kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is: 476 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2058516 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 70 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check_dn.cgi?num=2058516&kbps=3901&gen=gen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 20, 2003 Author CID Share Posted December 20, 2003 2nd place is the first place loser... lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evildevil Posted December 21, 2003 CID Share Posted December 21, 2003 My speed has surpassed the latest from cable guy ::: Download Stats ::: Connection is: 3960 kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is: 483 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2059401 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 71 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check_dn.cgi?num=2059401&kbps=3960&gen=gen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 21, 2003 Author CID Share Posted December 21, 2003 ooohhh ::: Download Stats ::: Connection is: 3981 kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is: 486 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2059716 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 71 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check_dn.cgi?num=2059716&kbps=3981&gen=gen ::: Download Stats ::: Connection is: 4002 kbps about 4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is: 489 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2060031 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 71 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check_dn.cgi?num=2060031&kbps=4002&gen=gen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted December 26, 2003 CID Share Posted December 26, 2003 Sorry, I cant beat that YET! I still cant figure out whats up with my PC. Microwave ( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted December 26, 2003 CID Share Posted December 26, 2003 2nd place is the first place loser... lol lol Ah I like that I'm going to have to find a way to work that into conversation, don't worry Ill quote you (lol) roll microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 26, 2003 Author CID Share Posted December 26, 2003 haha nice one huh... it's a sales thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottedwards2000 Posted December 27, 2003 CID Share Posted December 27, 2003 Wow, CA3BLE, what are you running to get almost 4Mbps? I assume a cable modem based on your name - I was cranked to recently get up to almost 3Mbps with Comcast, which I thought was near the top of the range for cable. Great site by the way. I've tried alot of testing sites, but yours is the one I always seem to come back to. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 27, 2003 Author CID Share Posted December 27, 2003 Thanks Scott, beleive it or not... cable modems are easily capible of speeds up to 50 Mbps One day we will see fiber in our homes, that will get you in the Gbps... or about 250 times faster than I am running ~ 18,000 times faster than 56K --- and this is on the low end at only 1 Gbps, hehe ~ but we need to first make computers that can process fast enough... the future RULES! - Damon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottedwards2000 Posted December 31, 2003 CID Share Posted December 31, 2003 50Mbps? Wow! What is it - is Comcast intentionally limiting me, then, to around 3Mbps? And Why? I salivate at the thought of the speeds you speak of. Finally, true on-demand high definition video over the net! By the way, this is probably off-topic, but do you or anyone else out there have any ideas or theories why even though many of us have speeds capable of receiving broadcast telelvision quality, there is STILL no option for on-demand television? I know the network affiliates would fear losing local advertising revenue, but why would the cable channels care? And why would the cable providers have anything to fear since they are already providing most of us with broadband anyway? (Maybe they think we'll watch less shows since we won't have to suffer through crap waiting for the ones we really want to watch...) Anyway, if anyone's interested, we could start a discussion on the GENERAL board or something. HEre's the best speed I've gotten: ::: Download Stats ::: Connection is: 3212 kbps about 3 Mbps (tested with 1013 KB) Download Speed is: 392 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2048181 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 57 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 3 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check.cgi?num=2048181&kbps=3212&gen=gen&a=17.7142857142857&b=6.28571428571429&c=1144.57142857143 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted December 31, 2003 Author CID Share Posted December 31, 2003 they cap the speeds to free resources on the main lines... so they can add more users... and so later on they can tier the service and make you pay more ~~ VOD is very hard to explain... but basically why you don't see more broadcast video on the internet is because it is expensive to the place that is serving the broadcast. Bandwidth is very expensive... and video takes a lot of it. There are plenty of places out there that offer video feeds of a lot of stuff... but you are going to pay a monthly feed for nice quality video. Full broadcast TV and HDTV takes up a whole lot more bandwidth than you think by the way... and that is something that you will not see 'streaming' to your PC any time soon. Just kick it on the couch and wait till about 2016, then we might have some more options out there. What the people who would think about investing in a venture like that will think... is that most people, when it comes to TV... ... well... will want to sit in front of a TV, not a computer. Why would they invest in something with a dim future. When it comes down to it... it all about the dough $$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy The Mountain RAR Posted January 5, 2004 CID Share Posted January 5, 2004 Howdy all new here and I am with Bresnan in MOntana here is my download Download Stats ::: Connection is: 3532 kbps about 3.5 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB) Download Speed is: 431 Kb/sec Auth Code: 2052981 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 63 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.38 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check.cgi?top=&ta=&num=2052981&kbps=3532&gen=gen&a=2.85714285714286&b=0&c=1145.14285714286 Here is my upload Upload Stats ::: Connection is: 757 kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1000 KB) Upload Speed is: 92 Kb/sec Auth Code: 261356 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 14 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 11.13 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check.cgi?top=&ta=&num=261356&kbps=757&gen=gen&a=2.85714285714286&b=0&c=1145.14285714286 I was fortunate to get in on the hay days of Excite@home when I first got cable and man at the time I did not realize just how fortunate I was. I always measrured over 5Mb down and at the time (like 5 years ago) the onoy tests I could find for upload couldn't measure it as it went off of the scale at ove 2MB up. I went through a nightmare several years of att and comcast abefore Bresnan took over and you can see the results Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted January 5, 2004 CID Share Posted January 5, 2004 Billy, Welcome hope you enjoy the site,tell your friends, Very nice speeds especially your upload being that high. microwave . This is to Damon, how are the times off so much?The time I posted is correct,just curious. o ? never mind it changrd it did say 830am^^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy The Mountain RAR Posted January 6, 2004 CID Share Posted January 6, 2004 Thanks for the wellcome Microwave I am really enjoying the new upload speed here is another I took a few min ago at least is is staying pretty much right in the same ball park Upload Stats ::: Connection is: 773 kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 1000 KB) Upload Speed is: 94 Kb/sec Auth Code: 261596 (validate a http://www.testmy.net) Bottom Line: 14 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 10.89 second(s) Validation Link :: https://testmy.net/cgi-bin/auth_check.cgi?top=&ta=&num=261596&kbps=773&gen=gen&a=3.42857142857143&b=0&c=1145.14285714286 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottedwards2000 Posted January 12, 2004 CID Share Posted January 12, 2004 VOD is very hard to explain... but basically why you don't see more broadcast video on the internet is because it is expensive to the place that is serving the broadcast. Bandwidth is very expensive... and video takes a lot of it. There are plenty of places out there that offer video feeds of a lot of stuff... but you are going to pay a monthly feed for nice quality video. Full broadcast TV and HDTV takes up a whole lot more bandwidth than you think by the way... and that is something that you will not see 'streaming' to your PC any time soon. Just kick it on the couch and wait till about 2016, then we might have some more options out there. What the people who would think about investing in a venture like that will think... is that most people, when it comes to TV... ... well... will want to sit in front of a TV, not a computer. Why would they invest in something with a dim future. When it comes down to it... it all about the dough $$$ Thanks for the thoughtful answer, CA3LE. I guess the bandwidth would cost more than they would make off the advertising, huh? All I know is that I would watch alot more tv if I could choose the time to watch the shows - I'm constantly coming home and saying "SH*T, I forgot that <blank> was on tonight". VCRs suck and apparently you need a phone line for the PVRs (how archaic - why have a PHONE line when you have cable and wireless?!). Anyway, I've been predicting for years that we would be able to watch shows when we want to, and it pisses me off that it hasn't happened yet. As for sitting in front of the computer, that's no problem when you have a laptop! By the way, what good video services that you mentioned do you know of? Are you tallking like RealOne? Cheers, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted January 12, 2004 Author CID Share Posted January 12, 2004 Cox in Phoenix had 'DVR' which is a PVR box that needs no phone line... it's friggen PiMP! As for a good video service... I havn't found any at the quality that I consider watchable... if anyone finds any service like that... at the very very least 300 Kbps ~~ at the least 600 Kbps quaility ... and also has a bunch of cool crap.. let me know. - Damon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted January 12, 2004 CID Share Posted January 12, 2004 Cox in Phoenix had 'DVR' which is a PVR box that needs no phone line... it's friggen PiMP! As for a good video service... I havn't found any at the quality that I consider watchable... if anyone finds any service like that... at the very very least 300 Kbps ~~ at the least 600 Kbps quaility ... and also has a bunch of cool crap.. let me know. - Damon ) Damon, I'm not at all familiar with the above mentioned formats I'm assuming you are not talking about a regular DVR , or are you? could you steer me in a direction where maybe I could get "schooled" I would appreciate it .Thanks oops Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted January 12, 2004 Author CID Share Posted January 12, 2004 DVR is Digital Video Recorder A product like PVR boxes (Personal Video Recorder) such as TiVO See DVR here >> http://www.cox.com/Phoenix/DigitalTV/dvr/ See TiVO here >> http://www.tivo.com/ - Damon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MICROWAVE Posted January 12, 2004 CID Share Posted January 12, 2004 ) Ah, OK it is DVR but it interfaces with cable,pretty cool with PIP etc, I just wasn't sure when you mentioned a tel. line. I'm still in the 20th century using my dual VCR VHS setup with analog cable. The DVR that COX offers looks pretty killa with lots of cool features!I'm assuming the picture quality since its digital would be top shelf? Anyway thanks for the info... Microwave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CA3LE Posted January 12, 2004 Author CID Share Posted January 12, 2004 Very nice indeed.. going to get much better when the entire line up in converted to digital... we can't use the best compression ratio yet because analog is taking up a lot of the bandwidth needed (analog takes up more bandwith than digital by the way... I am the first to admit that Direct TV and Dish do have a better picture than cable ~~~ but I would still rather have cable (there are many reasons why) ~~~ when Cox gets to 100% digital nobody will be able to compete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottedwards2000 Posted January 13, 2004 CID Share Posted January 13, 2004 Looks like we here in Comcast country will be getting DVR's soon too - plus STREAMING on-demand video too - WOW! The future is here! http://www.comcast.com/LocalHomepage/NewProducts.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.