resopalrabotnick Posted October 21, 2005 CID Share Posted October 21, 2005 ok, this is weirding me out. the forum is capping every instance of gb even in the middle of a word. wtf is up with that? hummingbird floatingboat dungbeetle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJVageli Posted October 21, 2005 CID Share Posted October 21, 2005 Im thinking its because GB also stands for Gigabyte,so maybe thats why it capitalizes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigw Posted October 22, 2005 CID Share Posted October 22, 2005 its the communists trying to get us to like green bay or great Britain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted October 22, 2005 CID Share Posted October 22, 2005 Ya know, he's got a point! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 22, 2005 it's them dam,ned space aliens i tell ya. and like i always say, this is a free beta i guess, or maybe it's actually paid for, in any case, the credits on the site for it look pretty open source like (yes, i checked, no developer with the initials gb was listed). you always pay for free stuff in the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkandra Posted October 22, 2005 CID Share Posted October 22, 2005 I guess I got You all hooked on GB. You had to star a new thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 22, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 22, 2005 yeah. it's all your fault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkandra Posted October 22, 2005 CID Share Posted October 22, 2005 Sorry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted October 23, 2005 CID Share Posted October 23, 2005 Those !!'s went outside the template! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 24, 2005 on what browser? my ie just snipped them at the border. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted October 24, 2005 CID Share Posted October 24, 2005 The almighty Fire Fox.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 24, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 24, 2005 that might explain it. the !!'s were like 3 lines full but w/o linefeed in the message window. i guess ie just snips at the b order while ff tries to display them, apparently the forum doesn't try to reformat to multiple lines which is strange in itself since it did so n the message window. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted October 24, 2005 CID Share Posted October 24, 2005 that's a better explanation then i could have given! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted October 25, 2005 CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 that might explain it. the !!'s were like 3 lines full but w/o linefeed in the message window. i guess ie just snips at the b order while ff tries to display them, apparently the forum doesn't try to reformat to multiple lines which is strange in itself since it did so n the message window. more info than i needed...need to know basis will be fine, thx ...jk ... i've been asking this same very important question ever since i noticed it in the photo thread...it's of grave importance that this problem gets resolved ASAP...i don't think i can take much more...cuz i luv hummingbirds but not humming birds ... but...floating boat would be 2 words i believe...huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted October 25, 2005 CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 :haha: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkandra Posted October 25, 2005 CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 I guess the person that open this Forum has to help us out or try to figure out what the problem is. They are the ones that set this up this forum. It still boggles my mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 25, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 floatingboat vs. floating boat was to see if there is some insidious syntax check to the effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted October 25, 2005 CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 floatinGBoat vs. floating boat was to see if there is some insidious syntax check to the effect. did u really mean to say insidious...cuz i don't think there is anything with this (auto correction) that will hurt anything...maybe u meant to say intrinsic or inherent...huh? ...jk ...i think it's merely an error in the smf coding...let's see... ajreiureafsagbajalreuriewgbajreurioehfes... yep inherent auto correct feature gone wild Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 25, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 i did mean insidious as in evil scheming malevolent software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdawnaz Posted October 25, 2005 CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 uh...okay...i don't quite see how GB could hurt anything...it's just irritating...maybe it's some malicious spyware maybe the feds r watching... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted October 25, 2005 Author CID Share Posted October 25, 2005 omg, now i see it. it's looking for instances of george bush in messages, and it tags gb as an abbreviation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.