Guest elliot1234 Posted November 27, 2005 CID Share Posted November 27, 2005 sorry this is an off topic question on the site. but anyone knows if it is safe to take a picture or like record a video from this nokia 7610 phone OF ANY MONITOR/TV/SCREEN. thank you for replies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted November 27, 2005 CID Share Posted November 27, 2005 Why not? I really don't see why it would hurt your phone at all...and if it does, just return it and tell them to give you a new one...simple! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingzero2309 Posted November 27, 2005 CID Share Posted November 27, 2005 sorry this is an off topic question on the site. but anyone knows if it is safe to take a picture or like record a video from this nokia 7610 phone OF ANY MONITOR/TV/SCREEN. thank you for replies its safe, but everytime i try to take a picture of another screen from my phone, it just looks like one big bright light. i dont think the phone can capture the quality of stuff like that. heres a pic of my phone taking a pic of my comp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted November 28, 2005 CID Share Posted November 28, 2005 well, at least it exposes long enough to avoid the partial screen effect. then again, camera phones are about as useless as tits on a bull. at least i haven;t seen one yet that has a usable resolution, quality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted November 28, 2005 CID Share Posted November 28, 2005 there's 2 mp ones coming out...and I saw on just yesterday that had a 2x OPTICAL zoom, and I could actually watch the lens moving in and out inside the phone, pretty creepy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywoodx954x Posted November 29, 2005 CID Share Posted November 29, 2005 well elliot buy a nokia N90 like me. its perfect on capturing up close screen shots and it is the best camera phone out there right now. its only 400 dollars at your local ritz camera store. i bought one coupledays ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 leaves the question why buy a 400 dollar phone with a dinky cam when you can spend the 400 dollars on a good phone and a good camera? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 400 dollars for a phone? you people are crazy I like free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywoodx954x Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 400 dollars for a phone that is over 800 dollars on the internet. i think its cheap. plus its the best camera phone that is made = Nokia N90. its available at ritz or wolf camera and is available if you guys want to buy it or look at it in the stores and play with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywoodx954x Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 the N90 is a 2 megapixel camera with 262,000 colors , 16 bit. It also has a carl zeiss optic lense with 20x optical zoom. WITHOUTH A DOUBT ITS THE BEST CAMERA PHONE OUT. available for only 400 dollars, thats cheap. if you guys want a picture from it ask me for one. i have it and its the best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 yes, I want a pic. There's no way that It has a 20x OPTICAL zoom, that's almost impossble. Please post some pics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elliot1234 Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 i already have nokia 7610 and hey u guys i dont mind the quality or anything. im fine with it im just worried whether it harms the lens. why the **** im so paranoid about this. N90 is awesome though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywoodx954x Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 Thes are pictures tooken from my N90 of the screen of my laptop. Compare these pictures to the 7610 pictures a couple posts before this one. Look at the quality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 Thes are pictures tooken from my N90 of the screen of my laptop. Compare these pictures to the 7610 pictures a couple posts before this one. Look at the quality. 400 bucks for that cell phone... rip off. My cell phones camera has better quality than that and it's a 50$ cell phone. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywoodx954x Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 im really sure of that, A VGA camera that you got for free from a activation. your camera sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REV0LUTI0NIZED Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 im really sure of that, A VGA camera that you got for free from a activation. your camera sucks. Not really I didn't get it for free. But whatever I'm not the idiot who payed 400 dollars for a cell phone with cheap camera quality. Let's just leave it at that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan314 Posted November 30, 2005 CID Share Posted November 30, 2005 Why in gods name pay 400 dollars for a cell phone that has a piece of s**t camera and video when u can spend like 100-300 on a good digital camera that has great quality pictures and video.. then just buy a phone with no camera for like 50 bucks from verizon... SIMPLE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywoodx954x Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 you guys are all retarded. take a picture with your crapfilled phone and post it and look at how bad it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 ok, since i'm so retarded (don't feed the troll, but really don't flame the troll. or reap what you sow) nokia n90. 2mp camera. carl zeiss optics, autofocus. nokia usa doesn't advertise the claimed 20x optical zoom, and it would be a great feature. leads me to the conclusion it's the zoom is probably the make my picture as grainy as can be by zooming in electronically, meaning interpolating what the middle 10 pixels of the sensor see. as for your 16 bit 262,000 colors, make up your mind. 16 bit would be 64k colors. 262,000 colors is what your display claims to be capable of. if either value is correct for the color depth of the pictures taken, it sucks the big one. for photos you want at least a 24 bit pallette, giving you 16.7 million colors. your conviction that the camera is the greatest thing since sliced bread? to each his own, but if i go and spend that much on a camera (the phone being worth maybe 120 or so with contract, means you blew 280 for a 2mp digicam. go to best buy and weep at the real digicams you can get for that money. with a real optical zoom. the quality of the pics you posted is frankly crap. doing a pic off a screen is never good quality, as shown by the moirees in the first one (those wavy interference lines where the grid of the screen and the sensor mesh like looking through two bug screens at once). the second one shows the graininess of the digital zoom. the third one gives some useful info on the sensor itself, which is low quality as in most phonecams. there is tons of hiss and noise evident in the picture, unless of course you spraypainted your laptop in subtle reds and blues in random spots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indestructable Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 he's got a point, though i didn't wanna start a fight...lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disturbed Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 well....we have concluded that it is impossible for that phone to have a 20 x optical zoom LOL - 20 x digital zoom yes - and it is nowhere near the quality when using optical zoom LOL - i dont think a single cell phone nowhere in near future will ever have even 2 x optical zoom it's true that it takes 2MB pictures, with an allright quality for a camera - but all facts aside - you could have spent 25 dollars on a cell phone and bought urself a nice 375 dollar camera that will shoot pictures making you believe you are there at that moment cheeers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywoodx954x Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 wow, those pictures was shot in the dark and of a screen of a laptop. I also zoomed in for those pictures and that is why it looks like that. You can zoom in 20x so I dont care what you say. If that phone costs $800 why wouldn't you buy it if it was half price. I only paid 400 with no activation or contract renewal. Whats so bad about it. I posted the pictures of the screen to show the person how much better you can actually see the screen compared to his camera. I can go take a picture of something else and prove you that the picture quality is a lot more better when there is light and if im not taking a picture of a screen or a tv. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disturbed Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 wow, those pictures was shot in the dark and of a screen of a laptop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disturbed Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 i mean, i take pictures with my cellphone too - but do i really care if its good quality .... not really...its only temporary and its a chance noone else will see the pic but me when i want a good quality picture, i grab a real camera Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resopalrabotnick Posted December 1, 2005 CID Share Posted December 1, 2005 the n90 looks about the size of a brick, is probably heavy too. (don't feel like looking up the stats again) and the reviews about it say that it has comparatively good cam features. compared to other cam phones. that's like saying saddam isn't such a bad guy, compared to hitler and osama. the hiss and noise noticable in the 3rd pic (and i'm pointing out that because there is a lot of area in that pic that is /not/ screen) is of course slightly more noticable due to the fact that you have a very dark object you're taking a pic of. but on a normal pic in daylight it will still be there, just not as noticable because the actual subject of the pic is more prominent. that is why in every serious test of digicams one should always snap a pic in darkness or near darkness, just to see how 'noisy' the sensor is. and i still say for 400 bucks you could have gotten a decent cellphone and a decent cam. not some hybrid that does both but neither really well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.