Blunted 2

you can still do a download test on mine from the links below and just download a file and post the speed you get and you can convert the speeds here. http://www.testmy.net/tools/convert.php mirror-Blunted (DOWNLOAD ONLY) Hosted in Seattle, WA - United States http://www.speakeasy.org/~eebobb/Speedtest/ mirror-Blunted2 (DOWNLOAD ONLY) Hosted in Tampa, FL - United States http://eebobb.com/speedtest/ Post links to your mirrors so people can do download tests till it is fixed.

here is my other connection but again the down is slow a bit and upload is fine. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 4904 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 599 kB/s Tested From:: http://teamxr.net Test Time:: 2006/10/04 - 7:12pm Bottom Line:: 86X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.71 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 35.031 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 15.85 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JU1D8I2OV User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] ::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 675 Kbps about 0.68 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 82 kB/s Tested From:: http://teamxr.net Test Time:: 2006/10/04 - 7:10pm Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 12.49 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 36.30048 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 15.58 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IHCUJ9MRX User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] Pinging teamxr.net [82.165.130.98] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 82.165.130.98: Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 11, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14ms Tracing route to teamxr.net [82.165.130.98] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms WRT54G [192.168.1.1] 2 11 ms 11 ms 16 ms er1.nyc1.speakeasy.net [216.254.112.1] 3 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms 220.ge-0-1-0.cr2.nyc1.speakeasy.net [69.17.83.20 1] 4 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 166.90.136.33 5 10 ms 10 ms 9 ms ae-23-56.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.178] 6 15 ms 14 ms 15 ms level3-up.nyc.schlund.net [4.78.164.2] 7 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms a0nycc2.gw-core-a.whn.schlund.net [217.160.229.1 06] 8 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms perfora.net [82.165.130.98] Trace complete.

here is my other connection but again the down is slow a bit and upload is fine. :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 4904 Kbps about 4.9 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 599 kB/s Tested From:: http://teamxr.net Test Time:: 2006/10/04 - 7:12pm Bottom Line:: 86X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.71 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 35.031 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 15.85 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-JU1D8I2OV User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] ::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 675 Kbps about 0.68 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 82 kB/s Tested From:: http://teamxr.net Test Time:: 2006/10/04 - 7:10pm Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 12.49 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 36.30048 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 15.58 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-IHCUJ9MRX User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!] Pinging teamxr.net [82.165.130.98] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Reply from 82.165.130.98: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 82.165.130.98: Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 11, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14ms Tracing route to teamxr.net [82.165.130.98] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms WRT54G [192.168.1.1] 2 11 ms 11 ms 16 ms er1.nyc1.speakeasy.net [216.254.112.1] 3 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms 220.ge-0-1-0.cr2.nyc1.speakeasy.net [69.17.83.20 1] 4 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 166.90.136.33 5 10 ms 10 ms 9 ms ae-23-56.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.68.97.178] 6 15 ms 14 ms 15 ms level3-up.nyc.schlund.net [4.78.164.2] 7 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms a0nycc2.gw-core-a.whn.schlund.net [217.160.229.1 06] 8 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms perfora.net [82.165.130.98] Trace complete.

the upload is good but the download is a bit low :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 3772 Kbps about 3.77 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 460 kB/s Tested From:: http://teamxr.net Test Time:: 2006/10/04 - 10:07am Bottom Line:: 66X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 2.23 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 6.49728 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 253.18 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-TIQDN1SGB User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.2; Linux 2.4.27; X11) (KHTML, like Gecko) [!] :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 17010 Kbps about 17.01 Mbps (tested with 20972 kB) Download Speed is:: 2076 kB/s Tested From:: http://teamxr.net Test Time:: 2006/10/04 - 10:09am Bottom Line:: 297X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.49 sec Tested from a 20972 kB file and took 10.1 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 76.43 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-SU7TA0CDM User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.2; Linux 2.4.27; X11) (KHTML, like Gecko) [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 30801 Kbps about 30.8 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3760 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/04 - 7:59am Bottom Line:: 537X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.27 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.234 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 219.65 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-0LCXU7BW4 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!]

anytime

yes i am but cable said some features would be down and the progress bar wont effect the speed by not being there.

nothing man thats my other connection

:::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 675 Kbps about 0.68 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 82 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/10/03 - 2:19pm Bottom Line:: 12X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 12.49 sec Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 36.32928 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Looks Great : 15.78 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-J4GSP92NM User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 5344 Kbps about 5.34 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Download Speed is:: 652 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/10/03 - 2:17pm Bottom Line:: 93X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 1.57 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 9.172 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 26.22 % faster than the average for host (speakeasy.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-K0QRPXCZU User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 [!]

i know man :haha: another thing is i got about 1 MB/s last night and now its only 237 Kb/s so yea its really fast alright LOL. garbage is what it is

this host is very slow if you ask me cause my ping and route is great but i get horrible speeds. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>tracert cachefly.com Tracing route to cachefly.com [66.225.240.37] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.50.192.1 2 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms dstswr1-vlan2.rh.lybrny.cv.net [167.206.33.33] 3 7 ms 6 ms 5 ms r3-ge9-2.mhe.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.33.1] 4 8 ms 5 ms 5 ms r1-srp0-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [65.19.104.193] 5 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms r2-srp5-0.in.nycmnyzr.cv.net [65.19.96.56] 6 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms 65.19.102.134 7 28 ms 29 ms 28 ms ge0-0-1.j2.ord.scnet.net [206.223.119.57] 8 31 ms 29 ms 44 ms ae1-4000m.c2.ord.scnet.net [64.202.110.66] 9 34 ms 35 ms 35 ms ae2-4000m.c1.ord.scnet.net [205.234.205.217] 10 28 ms 30 ms 29 ms cachefly.equinix.chicago1.cachepop.net [66.225.2 40.37] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>ping cachefly.com -t Pinging cachefly.com [66.225.240.37] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=55 Reply from 66.225.240.37: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 66.225.240.37: Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 29ms Control-C ^C C:Documents and SettingsEebobb> all of this is BS if you ask me cause they are really slow compared to testmy.net and claim to be faster than this host which they are not cause i am proof and have tests to prove it. The networks chosen all have multi-gigabit connectivity, a great reputation and strong SLA's. But how do they stack up on latency, the bottleneck in real-world tcp performance? The provider with the lowest latency is highlighted for each city on Level3's Network City CacheFly RackSpace HostWay The Planet Interland Atlanta, GA 12ms 32ms 20ms 20ms 28ms Baltimore, MD 1ms 52ms 20ms 36ms 20ms Boston, MA 8ms 56ms 20ms 40ms 24ms Chicago, IL 1ms 36ms 12ms 36ms 28ms Cincinnati, OH 4ms 36ms 12ms 40ms 36ms Cleveland, OH 8ms 44ms 16ms 40ms 20ms Charlotte, NC 16ms 36ms 24ms 24ms 32ms Dallas, TX 32ms 4ms 36ms 1ms 32ms Denver, CO 24ms 20ms 24ms 16ms 44ms Detroit, MI 4ms 40ms 4ms 44ms 36ms FIX-West NAP San Jose 1ms 60ms 56ms 44ms 76ms Garden City, NY 8ms 56ms 20ms 36ms 16ms Houston, TX 36ms 12ms 40ms 20ms 40ms Los Angeles, CA 12ms 48ms 68ms 32ms 68ms Las Vegas, NV 16ms 52ms 44ms 32ms 78ms Miami, FL 28ms 44ms 32ms 32ms 40ms Newark, NJ 4ms 52ms 20ms 36ms 20ms New York, NY 4ms 52ms 20ms 36ms 20ms Oakland, CA 1ms 64ms 60ms 44ms 76ms Orlando, FL 24ms 56ms 28ms 28ms 36ms Philadelphia, PA 4ms 52ms 24ms 36ms 20ms Phoenix, AZ 20ms 48ms 60ms 24ms 64ms Raleigh, NC 4ms 56ms 20ms 36ms 20ms Richmond, VA 8ms 56ms 20ms 36ms 16ms Sacramento, CA 4ms 60ms 64ms 44ms 80ms San Antonio, TX 40ms 16ms 48ms 8ms 40ms San Diego, CA 12ms 48ms 64ms 28ms 68ms Seattle, WA 20ms 64ms 48ms 40ms 72ms San Francisco, CA 1ms 60ms 56ms 44ms 76ms San Jose, CA 1ms 60ms 64ms 44ms 76ms Salt Lake City, UT 24ms 52ms 36ms 24ms 56ms Saint Louis, MO 4ms 32ms 4ms 32ms 32ms Stamford, CT 4ms 52ms 24ms 36ms 20ms Tampa, FL 32ms 40ms 36ms 24ms 48ms Tustin, CA 12ms 48ms 72ms 32ms 68ms Washington, DC 1ms 52ms 40ms 32ms 16ms Weehawken, NJ 4ms 52ms 24ms 40ms 20ms CacheFly RackSpace HostWay The Planet Interland Average Latency 12.19ms 47.22ms 35.55ms 33.25ms 43.33ms The numbers speak for themselves - CacheFly outperformed the competition:

yep its working for me now too

that site isnt very fast and it is full of bs if you read some of it. pretty crappy

my quote is broken too

:o :shock:

i never got this yet from internet explorer or firefox.

with cablenut

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 27246 Kbps about 27.25 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3326 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/10/01 - 4:31am Bottom Line:: 475X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.31 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.656 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 183.99 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-RCIGEY98X User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 3733 Kbps about 3.73 Mbps (tested with 12159 kB) Upload Speed is:: 456 kB/s Tested From:: http://s1.testmy.net Test Time:: 2006/10/01 - 4:35am Bottom Line:: 65X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 2.25 sec Tested from a 12159 kB file and took 26.68512 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 250.85 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-PH7KQ84FB User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!]

there is no uncapped modem unless you did it illegally. call your isp and ask what the advertised speeds are or check your bill and it might say it there.

if i could give ya some i would

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 27010 Kbps about 27.01 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3297 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/09/28 - 5:08am Bottom Line:: 471X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.31 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.688 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 181.74 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-9VPK678B1 User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) [!]

you stalker

yea i guess my isp is gonna keep fighting with fios. competition is great cause i went from 1 mb upload and 10 mb download to about 4 mb upload 30 mb download and i have 450 mb of webspace where i can host a website and i host a mirror for here on that. this all happened in less than a year because of fios. i cant even get fios till 2007 but heh i might not need it if it keeps going like this. anything new for internet coming up for you tommie?