Blunted 2

hey just what you think about this package? it destroys a T-1 35 Mbps downstream and 10 Mbps upstream (increased from 5/5), for $169.95 a month with a dynamic IP address and $209.95 with up to five static IP addresses.

my friend wants to split the 10/50 but the 5/50 is $90 a month which i would take cause i pay about $165 now

i will cancel the dsl and keep the cable for a while to compare the fiber 30 mb with cable 30 mb and then i will kill the cable and go right for the 10/50 plan they are gonna have by the time i get it.

soon i will have it :shock: :D

try it cause some network cards you dont need a crossover cable but if you do you can get 1 for a few bucks

my isp has a bad hop count but the ping times are good and sharky your pings are ok and the same hops you got timed out are the same as me cause you have OOL from the looks of your trace. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>tracert testmy.net Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 * * * Request timed out. 2 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms dstswr2-vlan2.rh.lybrny.cv.net [167.206.33.34] 3 7 ms 7 ms 5 ms r4-ge9-2.mhe.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.33.5] 4 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms r2-srp9-0.wan.hcvlny.cv.net [65.19.104.211] 5 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms r2-srp13-0.in.nycmnyzr.cv.net [65.19.96.136] 6 13 ms 11 ms 12 ms r1-pos3-0.in.asbnva16.cv.net [65.19.97.226] 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 14 ms 16 ms 13 ms so-4-0-0.mpr2.iad2.us.above.net [64.125.30.122] 9 14 ms 13 ms 13 ms so-0-0-0.mpr1.iad2.us.above.net [64.125.28.25] 10 16 ms 14 ms 13 ms so-4-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.29.133] 11 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms so-6-0-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.27.210] 12 41 ms 41 ms 45 ms so-3-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.29.169] 13 42 ms 43 ms 41 ms 216.200.6.237.theplanet.com [216.200.6.237] 14 43 ms 41 ms 42 ms vl32.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.127.62] 15 43 ms 43 ms 44 ms vl41.dsr01.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.83] 16 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms gi1-0-2.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.8 5] 17 46 ms 44 ms 43 ms 55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85] Trace complete. C:Documents and SettingsEebobb>

maybe not 100 up but the down seems to be going up fast

my CO is getting wired for fios in early 2007 according to verizon so by then maybe i will have 100 mb from them. lol

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060717/nym149.html?.v=53 its just sick what they are doing

:::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 1909 Kbps about 1.91 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 233 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 2) Test Time:: 2006/07/16 - 7:20pm Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.39 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 25.67136 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 93.81 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-4LSHJBWIV User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.2; Linux 2.4.27; X11) (KHTML, like Gecko) [!]

please dont post any other speed tests other than optimum online :::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 29931 Kbps about 29.93 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3654 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/07/16 - 2:42am Bottom Line:: 522X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.28 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.328 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 210.71 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-MD8KA0ZYS User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 1913 Kbps about 1.91 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 234 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/07/16 - 3:06am Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.38 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 25.61952 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 94.61 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-LUKX9CJN5 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!] :::.. Upload Stats ..::: Upload Connection is:: 1911 Kbps about 1.91 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB) Upload Speed is:: 233 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/07/16 - 3:09am Bottom Line:: 33X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 4.39 sec Tested from a 5983 kB file and took 25.64928 seconds to complete Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 94.4 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) U-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-GXCBDSVZ5 User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!]

hey kami i have ool and had it for a few years since the 1/10 package and want you to try this file for me and i have a bunch more for you to try. i get from 24 to 29 mb with the file i am giving you now on this computer but every comp is different and might need different setting for it to work better so PM me if you want some help and i'll get back to you as soon as i can.

/happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' /> /happy_bday.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':bday:' />:' />

that is more than 15/2 package or its cached cause your not going to get 5 mb above your cap no matter who the provider is. didnt verizon make the 15 mb package go upto 20 now?

make the send window bigger and the upload will go up on these kind of tests which makes them somewhat inaccurate

hey Tommie make your DefaultSendWindow 8192000 and watch what you get. with this test you have to have the right settings with cablenut or any other tweak program for it to be accurate

yea it gives fake results if your settings for cablenut are too high. if you set the defaultsendwindow too high it will make your results look like this. Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 6.33Mb/s <<this should read around 768 kb as i have the 768/6000 running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 5.12Mb/s these tests below are not accurate if you dont have the right settings just like the verizon test http://miranda.ctd.anl.gov:7123/ http://cemp1.switch.ch/network/performance/web100/tcpbw100.html http://web100.rit.edu:7123/ http://speedtest.umflint.edu/ http://nitro.ucsc.edu/ http://netspeed.stanford.edu/ http://jlab4.jlab.org:7123/

it showed pretty accurate results for me but i think i can make this say a different speed then i have and i'll try it in a second

http://speedtest.verizon.net/SpeedTester/help_speedtest.jsp

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 28583 Kbps about 28.58 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3489 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/07/12 - 4:47am Bottom Line:: 498X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.29 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.485 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 198.3 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-WFQ4UY1VN User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!]

welcome to the forums joka90 what is your advertised speeds?

:::.. Download Stats ..::: Download Connection is:: 27127 Kbps about 27.13 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 3311 kB/s Tested From:: https://testmy.net/ (Server 1) Test Time:: 2006/07/09 - 11:48pm Bottom Line:: 473X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 0.31 sec Tested from a 12160 kB file and took 3.672 seconds to complete Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 182.72 % faster than the average for host (optonline.net) D-Validation Link:: https://testmy.net/stats/id-QYD0O49MJ User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4 [!]

:D :D :D :D owned

for playing he has planty of upload and download but might lag a bit to servers far away in another country. as for hosting you probably cant do more that 4 to 6 people.

why dont they just upgrade since most ISP's are doing it? my isp more than doubled the speeds we have going from 1/10 to 2/15 and 2/30 mb. i havent heard anything but maybe someone who has comcast can say why they dont just upgrade the speeds like they were going to.